Re: Homosexuality and punishment of Qaum-e-Lut
minah pa - that's true. homosexuality doesn't hurt anyone if its done just between two people.
But when you've got a man cheating on his wife with another man, its still adultery - still punishment-worthy.
When you've got a person molesting a child of the same sex (still classifed as homosexual in nature) - still punishment-worthy.
When you've got a person having consentual sex with the same gender except that one partner is underage - still punishment-worthy.
So, homosexuality is liable to hurt people, just like heterosexuality is.
Now, the Quranic punishment is unclear, because the Quam of Lut were practicing homosexuality majority-wise. So it was more of a widespread problem, rather than just a few doing it. Furthermore, the punishment is delievered by God. God didn't ask the Prophet of that era/place to give the punishment.
So that reserves for an interpretation that says homosexuality is bad, but its up to God to punish one for it. So I think many countries are wrong when they go for state-punishments for homosexuality.
From what I understand, the only allowance made to a concerned citizen regarding the occurrence of homosexuality, is that the concerned citizen can counsel the couple.
And if we want to talk about it from a non-religious point of view, many homosexuals have reverted to a heterosexual lifestyle. That's another piece of evidence that tells me homosexuality is not something that is "natural".
The only natural kind of homosexuality I can see that is under debate, are people who have a female genotype, but then they are outwardly male or vice versa. With those people, there is confusion as to which gender they should adopt and which gender they should form sexual relations with.