This seems to me as real alternate history being written with the help of Da Vinci Code and some non authentic research.
Dhaka's muslin in time of christ. well too good to be true.
Pathania, i believe you are by nature the type of accepts everything which seems out of the box. The approach is better to move forward but sometime you fall into the trap laid by these authors. How authentic are the records of the monastries and about the grave in muree, i have never heard of it, though i will check it from the locals but remember there are too many holy graves in the subcontinent. we people are very superstitious.
Do not believe everything which comes in your way. i am sure here your curious nature is making you believe which has been presented to you in the garb of being anti-establishment and you feel it too be true.
It’s only the Qadiyani lobby who has this faith.. they had to because eventually Mirza Ghulam Ahmed claimed to be Jesus…
According to the Islamic view, Jesus never died, nor cruicified but was raised alive with his body up the heavens around the age of 32/33 and will return at the end of time and complete the Prophecy of the Quran where it mentions that he:as: will speak to people in KAHOOLAT, which is only attained at the age of 40.
my question to AQ is ..... will jesus come down to earth in the same age when He AS was descended up in heaven?... and if so, will he not have any parents?
another question : According to you, When Jesus AS will come to earth bodily, He AS will accept Islam. Will you naozobillah change the context of Quran where Jesus is mentioned as the prophet of bani israel?
Just curious, that's all....no need to offence anyone's believes.
Dhaka's muslin in time of christ. well too good to be true.
Pathania, i believe you are by nature the type of accepts everything which seems out of the box. The approach is better to move forward but sometime you fall into the trap laid by these authors. How authentic are the records of the monastries and about the grave in muree, i have never heard of it, though i will check it from the locals but remember there are too many holy graves in the subcontinent. we people are very superstitious.
Do not believe everything which comes in your way. i am sure here your curious nature is making you believe which has been presented to you in the garb of being anti-establishment and you feel it too be true.
MKF,
**This book was published in 2003 before Da Vinci Code. I don't believe in everything that comes in my way but no harm in listening to what other say. **
**Extending the same logic..how do we ascertain that all holy books contain the original texts and no alteration/modification has taken place with the passage of time. **
American Mormon missionaries I met yesterday claim that Jesus had also been to USA...another discovery..this time through missionaries !!
Well Frozen fire, Hazrat Issa is already a Muslim or Momin as all those true religions before advent of Hazrat Muhammad
About age, it is anybody's guess, i assume that this should not be a matter of concern as we are talking about movement from a timeless domain to a timed domain.
Pathania in our opinion the story ends, in your opinion it does not, so far so good. How can you decide it does not end "really"? This is biased thinking that your opinion is "really".
Well Da Vinci Code has taken its origin from 80's book, HOly Mary Holy Grail. so anybody's guess.
Any one can make claims, that is how conspiracy theories work.
About religious texts etc about Quran i can tell you, the earliest documented manuscripts are the same as they are today, the first time it was transferred onto paper till date no change in wordings. Trust
Well Da Vinci Code has taken its origin from 80's book, HOly Mary Holy Grail. so anybody's guess.
Any one can make claims, that is how conspiracy theories work.
About religious texts etc about Quran i can tell you, the earliest documented manuscripts are the same as they are today, the first time it was transferred onto paper till date no change in wordings. Trust this argument or not your choice.
The most researched religion by its opponents is Islam, so many europeans
Well Da Vinci Code has taken its origin from 80's book, HOly Mary Holy Grail. so anybody's guess.
Any one can make claims, that is how conspiracy theories work.
About religious texts etc about Quran i can tell you, the earliest documented manuscripts are the same as they are today, the first time it was transferred onto paper till date no change in wordings. Trust this argument or not your choice.
The most researched religion by its opponents is Islam, so many europeans have become orientalists and spent their lives to find faults in this books and they come out with a handful of discrepancies taken from no one else but muslim commenataries themselves.
Well Da Vinci Code has taken its origin from 80's book, HOly Mary Holy Grail. so anybody's guess.
Any one can make claims, that is how conspiracy theories work.
About religious texts etc about Quran i can tell you, the earliest documented manuscripts are the same as they are today, the first time it was transferred onto paper till date no change in wordings. Trust this argument or not your choice.
The most researched religion by its opponents is Islam, so many europeans have become orientalists and spent their lives to find faults in this books and they come out with a handful of objections taken from no one else but muslim commenataries themselves. All it takes no more than one sitting to prove them baseless to any rational person. you can search for these objections by opening up the macropedia article on Islam in encyclopedia Britannica. No other religion has been defined in two ways. through its followers eyes and through the eyes of outsiders. any answer?
It is not a question of biased thinking. My point was....if such things are cropping up regularly..they must be having at atleast an iota of truth it them.
Like a book which states that Prophet Mohammed was prophecied in Hindu Scriptures to come to this world.
My conclusion about religion is very simple....it is the same supreme power which is being named in different ways by different people.
If Muhammad (saw) is the "Seal" of the Prophets, what means, that there will be no Prophet after Muhammad (saw), why would Jesus then return back?
Religions are like lessons, began with Judaism, followed by Christianity and brought to it's Final Stage with Islam, why would a Crist come back allegedly and tell us to stop the sh't in this World and not our Rasool (saw).
Islam, the final law, God's law. Why would someone come with God's "old" law to tell us what is right and what not?
Why is neither Judaism, nor Christianity saying
"The Holy Book, A Guideline for Humanity"
but Islam does?
Anwar Qureshi, I'm disappointed by your words. I'm not here to judge about you, I don't have the right, but it's ridiculous when you claim to be a true muslim and bash against Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. That's not a good deed of a true Muslim.
he did not have parents to begin with. He only had mother Maryam (AS) and Jesus will decend live with the angels and not born again, so the question is ridiculous.
Are you out of your mind. Every Prophet and Apostle was a muslim to begin with. I do not know what is your definition of being Muslim but Muslim is one who believes in Allah:swt: and the Prophet of his/her time.
Who said so? He will still come as a **Rasool **to Bani Israel but a Nabi to rest of the humanity. This is an extra status he will be given. To say that, if Prophet:saw: was the last of the prophet, bringing Isa:as: is denying of that faith is a sign of ignorance when one fail to see that Isa:as: came before Muhammad:saw: and never died and lived even after the departure of the last prophet:saw:.. How can that made him come after the last prophet?
And to say that why Jesus, and why not Muhammad, coming again… simple answer is that because Jesus was lift alive and it was the plan of Allah:swt: to have final decision between the Ummah of Jesus (Jews) and Jesus through the prophet of ummah itself and not by the higher authority of the Muhammad:saw: … This is very logical if really realizes the context. Otherwise, we end up with people who first were believer of 2nd coming of Jesus, then they become Mehdi, then Isa and finally above Muhammad, Naaouzu Billah!