His name is Khan, and he is not a terrorist

Re: His name is Khan, and he is not a terrorist

Why opposing drones is aking to favouring Taliban? I understand that we all know about the population of Fata. We can take a fresh look at the New Stanford/NYU study on drones for an independently-researched view.

IK has been saying it openly that he is not against the US but opposes some of its policies. I wonder why it should be termed as doublespeak. If drones stop, would you please share with me, what exactly we have against the US?