Re: Hindustan carrying out terrorist attacks in Pakistan
If you can call me a thief, I can call you a fool. As you said, "nobody gets to cry 'you hit me back first'"
When did I call you a thief? I only called those attacking the police in Srinagar that. Now if you did that, sure.
Now you're just backtracking on your initial statement. You initially denied that the RAW even played a role in E.Pakistan: **"not even your Pakistani friends will give you any credibility if this is what you believe about Bangla Desh."
**Come on don't mix things up. Does this statement say anything about RAW's capability? Because they didn't do something doesn't mean they are not capable of it. And because they are capable of something doesn't mean they did it. Motive and Ability are two different things.
Why not? Political alarmists aside, everyone knows there's no real threat of an Islamist takeover in Pakistan. The benefits of destabilizing Pakistan are the same as they've always been.
Threat assessment will be different when a Pakistani does it versus when a non-Pakistani does it. Example - Aussie cricket team trying ti cancel the tour. The other thing to consider is this: Risk is a product of Probability and Impact. EVen if you consider the probability of a islamist takeover of Pakistan low, the impact of such remote event is so high. Further, it doesn't require a full-scale takeover. Just a couple of rogue employees sympathetic to the islamist cause in the right place is sufficient.
In all likelihood, they are internal conflicts...then again, I haven't looked into them in any serious detail.
However, I have very little doubt in my mind that the Balochis are getting a good chunk of their funding from India.
Man, please look for some more evidence and motives. Lal Masjid is more likely a motive for the bombs than any grand Indian design. Don't give our babus that much credit!