Fanatical Hindu Parties:
Rashtriya Swayam Seyak Shang (R.S.S)
Vishwa Hindu Parishad
Hindu Munnani
Arya Samaj
Shiv sena
Bharatiya Janata Parishad
Sant Samiti
Hindu Mahasabha
Baajrang Dal
Ghazi
Facts Are The Authority!
Cow Slaughter in Hindu Scriptures
Excerpts From: Hinduism and Islam A Comparative Study
It is interesting to note that the cow used to be slaughtered by the ancient Hindus to enjoy its beef, entertain the guests and offer it as sacrifice to their deities.
[Mahatma] Gandhi himself says, "I know there are scholars who tell us that cow-sacrifice is mentioned in the Vedas. I... read a sentence in our Sanskrit text-book to the effect that Brahmins of old [period] used to eat beef" [M.K. Gandhi, Hindu Dharma, New Delhi, 1991, p. 120]. He, however, refrained from showing enough courage in clearly speaking the truth, may be because he did not like to hurt the sentiments of the people who were the main source of his political strength.
There are clear evidences in the Rig Veda, the most sacred Hindu scripture, that the cow used to be sacrificed by Hindus for religious purposes. For instance, Hymn CLXIX of the Rig Veda says:
"May the wind blow upon our cows with healing; may they eat herbage ... Like-coloured various-hued or single- coloured whose names through sacrifice are known to Agni, Whom the Angirases produced by Ferbvour - vouschsafe to these, Parjanya, great.protection. Those who have offered to the gods their bodies whose varied forms are all well known to Soma" [The Rig Veda (RV), translated by Ralph H. Griffith, New York, 1992, p. 647]. In the Rig Veda (RV: VIII.43.11) Agni is described as "fed on ox and cow" suggesting that cattle were sacrificed and roasted in fire. Another hymn (RV: X.16.7) mentions the ritual enveloping of the corpse with cow flesh before applying the fire on it.
In the Brahmanas at 1.15 in the Aiteriya Brahmana, the kindling of Agni on the arrival of King Some is compared to the slaughter of a bull or a barren cow on the arrival of a human king or other dignitary.
Similarly, at II.1.11.1 in the Taiteriya Brahmana and XXXI.14.5 in the Panchavinsha Brahmana, the rishi Agastya is credited with the slaughter of a hundred bulls.
In verse III.1.2.21 in the Satapatha Brahmana, sage Yajnavalkaya asserts that even though the cow is the supporter of everyone, he would eat beef "if it is luscious." At IV.5-2.1 in the same Brahmana, it is said that a barren cow can be slaughtered in the Some sacrifice. Not only for religious purposes, but also for other purposes one could kill a cow and eat beef. Thus at II.4.2 of the same Brahmana, it is suggested that a fat bull or fat goat should be sacrificed in honour of an important guest.
Similarly, the Brihadaranyaka Upanishada (VI.4.18) advises a couple to take an evening meal of beef or veal pulao, if they desire to beget a son who is learned in the Vedas [Robert Trumbull, As I see India, London, 1957, p.241].
Ghazi
Facts Are The Authority!
Noble Quran 16:125!
016.125
YUSUFALI: Invite (all) to the Way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knoweth best, who have strayed from His Path, and who receive guidance.
PICKTHAL: Call unto the way of thy Lord with wisdom and fair exhortation, and reason with them in the better way. Lo! thy Lord is Best Aware of him who strayeth from His way, and He is Best Aware of those who go aright.
SHAKIR: Call to the way of your Lord with wisdom and goodly exhortation, and have disputations with them in the best manner; surely your Lord best knows those who go astray from His path, and He knows best those who follow the right way.
It has been my pleasure to edcuate you about the facts of Hinduism. However, it is strange to notice that our Hindu members of GupShup decided to stay away from this thread. It is their decision to avoid the truth. The facts speak for itself. These are irrefutable facts. I would respectfully urge my Hindu friends to explore Islaam with an open mind. This link >>> http://www.themodernreligion.com/index2.html
will give you access to Noble Quran in EIGHTEEN LANGUAGES, with three translations in English. The same link will give you access to a plethora of information about Islaam.
Wama alaina illal balagh!
Ghazi
Facts Are The Authority!
[This message has been edited by Ghazi (edited April 02, 2000).]
I am not going to bother again to argue about status of women in India vs. that in some other countries. For people widely travelled, truth is there to see. Also for people in US, who can see how Indian women are making independent decisions in their life compared to their burqa-clad counterparts no furter arguments r needed.
This report could be of interest to u. http://www.chowk.com/bin/showa.cgi?ssaulat_apr0200
P.S. as far as staying away from thread is concerned, none can be so prolific if he is not into cut and paste. Every three minutes u r adding new message. So we hope ur collection is finished now.
[This message has been edited by ZZ (edited April 03, 2000).]
Mr Extreme got himself a new nick!
How about you and BB joining me in discussing the human rights violation our Islam has committed upon fellow muslims, both women and non-sunnis; human rights violation against non-muslims:hindus & christian,bahais.
Your buddy,
aDbul malick
zz:
You answer does not address the real questions I raised by providing facts. Your response is off target. Beside that your allegations are childish, please read BB's post about your crap about cut and paste. If you want to debate on issues you must have your facts handy. The link you posted about some non-sense proves thing. We are discussing here the religions NOT lies or individual behavior which we don't know is true or not? I have multiple web sites and I can post lies on many pages about anything. Everything you find on WWW/Internet is not true. So burdon of proof remains on you. /how Hindu women is doing in USA has nothing to do with what Hindu believes and Hinduism teaches? Next time try to make some sense.
Ghazi
Facts Are The Authority!
[This message has been edited by Ghazi (edited April 03, 2000).]
we keep giving the same arguments explaining hinduism. it is not well defined religion, does not have single set of customs and customnms have changed in time, sometimes for better and sometimes for worse.
given that what a hindu believes does not have an unique answer, one should see how hindu behaves, how much freedom or opression is there in hindu society at this time. this was precisely the issue i was addressing. again, hindus do not believe they are becoming less hindus when the customs change, since that is the very essence.
since i am not a big expert on islam. but have seen muslim society so i found it fit to compare freedom to women in thse two socities.
it is perfectly possible that islam as religion gives freedom to women but muslim societies don't. i am not bothered about that. if one assumes ur version of hinduism, hindus should keep the women completely opressed, but there seems to be clearly more freedom to hindu women than Muslim women in practice in respective societies.
there are ways to compare it. compare literacy rates, in women. compare legal protection. sati is not only banned, a chief minister of Rajasthan had to resign when such a case occured 10 yrs ago. Karo-kari goes unpunished.
What makes anybody think Ghazi is me? Do you think if I had access to all this stuff I would have waited till now to slap it in your faces?
ad-bull you have obviously been missing me. Unfortunately the feeling isn't mutual.
You got a point there Xtreme ;-)
Ghazi,
Grab your glocks when you see 2PaK
Call the cops when you see 2PaK
[This message has been edited by Roman (edited April 03, 2000).]
Ghazi and 2Pack, come on now guys, what you gonna gain by using such language, huh?
[quote]
Originally posted by Roman:
Ghazi and 2Pack, come on now guys, what you gonna gain by using such language, huh?
[/quote]
If our foes use the facts rather hatred we can debate. But they are determined to provoke us or use non-sense.
Irrefragable
Islaam Is The *ONLY Solution! *****And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers]. Noble Quran 3:85*
ZZ:
I am disappointed with your lack of reasoning. Since you aksed for it, here is the mirror in response of your rhetoric.
Amnesty International Report 1997 : India
Thousands of political prisoners were held without charge or trial. Torture, including rape, and ill-treatment were endemic throughout the country, leading or contributing to at least 200 deaths in custody. Prison conditions amounting to ill-treatment were common. "Disappearances" continued. Hundreds of people were reportedly extrajudicially executed by the security forces; human rights defenders continued to be targeted. At least two people were judicially executed and at least 30 were on death row. Armed opposition groups committed grave human rights abuses, including deliberate and arbitrary killings of civilians and hostage-taking.
In June, the United Front, a coalition of regional and national parties led by Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda, formed a government with the support of the Congress Party, following the brief tenure of a Bharatiya Janata Party (bjp) government, led by A.B. Vajpayee after general elections in April and May. The new government committed itself to ratifying the un Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. In September, state assembly elections were held in Jammu and Kashmir, ending nine years of central rule. The successful National Conference Party promised to establish a human rights commission to investigate allegations of human rights violations committed in the previous seven years and a committee to review the cases of political detainees.
The government continued to face violent attacks by armed opposition groups in Jammu and Kashmir, throughout the northeastern states and in some other parts of the country, including Andhra Pradesh. In some areas former members of armed opposition groups _ so-called "renegades" _ apparently acting with the connivance of the security forces, reportedly carried out killings, abductions and rapes.
Preventive detention provisions remained in force in national legislation, including the National Security Act, and in state-specific legislation, including the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act and the Tamil Nadu Goondas Act. The Criminal Law Amendment Bill, proposed in 1995 as a replacement to the lapsed Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (tada), was not enacted and hundreds remained in detention under the tada (see Amnesty International Report 1996). Other special legislation remained in force, including the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act _ which gives the security forces the right to shoot to kill with virtual impunity _ and the Disturbed Areas Act. Judicial review of these statutes had been pending in the Supreme Court of India since 1980.
Such legislation was criticized by the National Human Rights Commission (nhrc), established in 1993, which continued initiatives to raise public awareness of human rights and reported on human rights violations in several states, although its recommendations were not binding. Despite giving discretionary powers such as awarding compensation, the mandate of the nhrc remained limited in relation to human rights violations committed by the armed forces, effectively excluding the areas where there was violent opposition activity.
Thousands of political prisoners were detained without charge or trial under special legislation _ such as the tada, the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act and the Disturbed Areas Act _ which lacked vital legal safeguards.
In March, the government disclosed that more than 42,000 people were detained pending trial under the tada. However, following a Supreme Court directive ordering the release on bail of various categories of detainee, the government revised the figure in December to 2,000. The National Security Act was used in July to detain Narayan Reddy during a protest in Gopalpur, Orissa State, against the decision to build a steel plant in the area. It was used throughout the year to detain people suspected of involvement in armed opposition in the northeastern states.
A number of reports were received about the use of false charges to quell dissent. In October, 16 women, including three juveniles, protesting against the Miss World Contest in Bangalore were detained for 17 days, after reportedly being beaten in police custody, on a false, non-bailable charge of causing damage by fire.
At least 1,500 Nepali-speaking people from southern Bhutan living in refugee camps in eastern Nepal, were arrested in West Bengal between January and April during a series of peaceful marches in the border region aimed at presenting a petition to the King of Bhutan (see Bhutan entry). Of these, 791 remained detained for over two months, before being released without charge in July.
Refugees arriving in India from Afghanistan, Myanmar and Sri Lanka were detained under the Foreigners Act, which regulates the entry of aliens into India but makes no provision for refugees.
Torture, including rape, and ill-treatment were endemic throughout the country. Victims included suspected political activists, criminal suspects, people from underprivileged sections of society and those defending their economic and social rights. Torture was used to extract information from common criminal suspects and to humiliate and degrade detainees.
Firoz Ahmed Ganai, a suspected member of an armed opposition group, was arrested in November 1995 in Sonawar, Jammu and Kashmir, and tortured while in the custody of the Border Security Force. He subsequently suffered kidney failure and had to have his leg amputated. In January, the government claimed that his leg became gangrenous after he fell and fractured it in heavy snow. Despite medical reports stating that the kidney failure may have been a result of torture, no investigation was carried out. Husband and wife Parkash Singh and Nirmal Kaur from Nabha, Patiala, were taken into custody by the Punjab police in April on suspicion of possessing drugs. They were both stripped and beaten with fists and sticks. Wooden rollers were rolled over the muscles in their thighs. They were released on bail and filed a complaint of torture with the Punjab and Haryana High Court. It had not been heard by the end of the year.
In May, Rajesh, a 14-year-old rag-picker from Kerala, was illegally detained and tortured by police who denied that he was in their custody. Pins were reportedly inserted under his nails, his head was banged against the wall and he was beaten on the soles of his feet. No inquiry appeared to have been ordered into his torture and illegal detention. In July, police entered a village in Uttar Pradesh inhabited predominantly by dalits (members of a socially and economically disadvantaged group determined by caste hierarchies) at midnight in search of a suspect. A female relative of the suspect was beaten, stripped and pinned to the ground by a police officer in front of the villagers. Police later threatened to rape her if she attempted to lodge a complaint.
Villagers, including women, were beaten by police in June in Mithini and Khairi villages in Uttar Pradesh. They had been arrested during a protest to defend their land from being bulldozed as part of the expansion of a thermal power project funded by the World Bank.
At least 200 people were reported to have died in the custody of police, security forces and prison officials, many following torture. The figure may be higher; the nhrc recorded 159 deaths in custody in the first three months of 1996. For example, in August, Gopalappa, an unemployed man, died in police custody in Karnataka. A post-mortem report found that his spleen had ruptured as a result of a blow to the stomach.
Although the number of cases of torture and death in custody in which compensation was awarded increased _ in a number of cases on the recommendation of the nhrc _ there were few convictions. In a rare example, two police officers were fined and sentenced in August to one year's imprisonment for the torture of Archana Guha in Calcutta in 1974, after a 20-year legal battle by her brother. Both officers appealed to the High Court, but the outcome was not known at the end of the year.
Both the nhrc and the Supreme Court spoke of the harsh conditions in which most prisoners were kept. The nhrc proposed changes to the India Prisons Act, reporting that some prisoners were kept in shackles for long periods. The Supreme Court called on the prison authorities to end torture and overcrowding.
"Disappearances" continued and the fate of hundreds of people who "disappeared" in previous years remained unknown. In Manipur, Laishram Bijoykumar _ whose brothers had reportedly been members of an armed opposition group _ was taken from his house late at night in June, reportedly by soldiers in civilian clothes. Reports suggested that he was being held in an army camp in Manipur. A habeas corpus writ was filed in the High Court in Guwahati and there were widespread demonstrations against his "disappearance". However, the army continued to deny that he was in their custody, and his whereabouts remained unknown at the end of the year
In August, the Central Bureau of Investigation submitted an interim report into allegations that police in Punjab had extrajudicially executed hundreds of young men and disposed of their bodies. The report found that at one site alone 934 unidentified bodies _ presumed by human rights groups to be those of "disappeared" young men _ had been cremated between 1990 and 1995. The Bureau completed its inquiry into the abduction of Jaswant Singh Khalra, a lawyer and human rights activist from Punjab who "disappeared" after filing a petition in the Supreme Court about the cremation grounds (see Amnesty International Report 1996). The inquiry concluded that he had been taken by the police. His whereabouts were unknown.
Hundreds of people were reportedly extrajudicially executed by members of the security forces. In March, the tied and mutilated body of Jalil Andrabi, Chairman of the Kashmir Commission of Jurists, was found in the Jhelum river, near Srinagar, in Jammu and Kashmir. Three weeks earlier he had been detained by members of the Rashtriya Rifles who were accompanied by unidentified armed men. Investigations into his abduction and death continued in the High Court in Jammu and Kashmir.
In September, in the State of Andhra Pradesh, Dr Ameda Narayana, a doctor practising in an area where the government faces armed opposition, was reportedly shot dead by members of the police.
Reports were received that harassment, abduction, rape and deliberate and arbitrary killings perpetrated by so-called "renegades" in Jammu and Kashmir, and by other such groups, in Assam and other states, were carried out with the support of the security forces. Parag Kumar Das was killed by suspected former members of the armed opposition group United Liberation Front of Assam (ulfa), known as sulfa (surrendered ulfa), acting on behalf of the state authorities. Parag Das's son, Rohan Das, aged eight, was injured in the shooting.
At least two people were judicially executed and at least 30 were sentenced to death or remained on death row.
Armed opposition groups committed grave human rights abuses, including torture, deliberate and arbitrary killings of civilians, and hostage-taking. In May, following public threats that anyone participating in the elections would be killed, armed opposition groups in Jammu and Kashmir killed several election candidates. The victims included a Congress leader, his wife and two children who were killed in Rajauri, and election officials who were blown up in a bus in Dada.
In January, Amnesty International expressed concern at the quashing of the Srikrishna Enquiry, a judicial inquiry into allegations of police killings during the riots in Bombay in 1992 and 1993 (see Amnesty International Reports 1993 and 1994). The inquiry was subsequently reinstated in May 1996 during the brief tenure of the bjp government. In February, Amnesty International published a report, India: Harjit Singh _ in continuing pursuit of justice, which documented the virtual immunity from prosecution for human rights violations afforded by the operation of the legal process.
In March, a report, Amnesty International and India, provided a detailed summary of the organization's concerns in India, particularly in relation to legislation and the legal process.
In April, Amnesty International sent an open letter to all political parties on the occasion of the general elections, setting out its human rights concerns. The organization issued a number of appeals to the security forces and armed opposition groups in Jammu and Kashmir, calling for human rights to be respected in the election period. Concerns were raised about attacks on political leaders and their detention under house arrest, death threats against civilian electoral officials and harassment of journalists and human rights defenders.
In July and August, Amnesty International delegates were granted access to India to conduct research for the second time in 16 years and held talks with government officials, members of the nhrc and numerous human rights activists. In September, the organization published a report, India: Human rights abuses in the election period in Jammu and Kashmir, which had been submitted to the Indian Government during the visit. The report detailed abuses by the security forces, "renegade" and armed opposition groups, and recommended, among other things, the disarming and disbanding of "renegade" groups. The government dismissed the report as containing "baseless and absurd allegations", while acknowledging inquiries instituted into the killing of Jalil Andrabi and Ghulam Rasool Sheikh.
In July, Amnesty International called for the release of the five foreign hostages held since July 1995 in Jammu and Kashmir (see Amnesty International Report 1996).
Irrefragable
Islaam Is The *ONLY Solution! *****And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers]. Noble Quran 3:85*
Oh my god, 2Pak is Hindu, you ...
Oh my god, 2Pak you're Hindu, you ...
Actually --- he's worse than a Hindu -- He's a Shia :)(just kidding)
Mr. Xtreme -- I believe you --- so what are your comments on all this "juicy stuff". :) :) :)
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU said in his "THE DISCOVERY OF INDIA" (Page 37):
"HINDUISM as a faith is vague, amorphous, many sided, all things to all men.
It is hardly possible to define it, or indeed to say definitely whether it is a religion
or not, in the usual sense of the word. In its present form, and even in the past, it
embraces many beliefs and practices, from the highest to the lowest, often
opposed to or contradicting each other."
Ghazi
Facts Are The Authority!
The MANU SMRITI (BIBLE OF HINDUISM) says:
(a) A Brahmin is born to fulfill Dharma. Whatever exists in the world is the
property of the Brahmin. On account of the excellence of his origin, he is entitled
to all. All mortals subsist through the benevolence of the Brahmin.
(b) Ignorant or learned, a Brahmin is still a great deity.
TO BRAHMINS - THE THREE WORLDS AND THE GODS OWE THEIR
EXISTENCE.
Dr Ambedkar says the cardinal principles of Brahminism are six:
Graded inequality between the different classes.
The complete disarmament of the Shudras and Untouchables.
The complete prohibition of education to the Shudras and Untouchables.
Ban on the Shudras and the Untouchables in occupying places of power and
authority.Ban on the Shudras and the Untouchables in acquiring property.
The complete subjugation and suppression of women.
"Inequality is therefore the official doctrine of BRAHMINISM" (IBID - 204).
"Devadhinam jagat sarvarm
Mantradhinam ta devata
Tam Mantram Brahmandhinam
Brahmana nam devata"
Meaning:
The Universe is under the power of gods,
The gods are under the power of the mantras,
The mantras are under the power of the Brahmins,
Therefore the Brahmins are our gods.
Abbe J.A. Dubois's "Hindu Manners, Customs and Ceremonies" Oxford, Third
Edition 1906, Page 139. See also page 93.
Ghazi
Facts Are The Authority!
FANATICAL HINDU PARTIES
RASHTRIYA SWAYAM SEWAK SHANG (R.S.S.)
VISHWA HINDU PARISHAD
HINDU MUNNANI
ARYA SAMAJ
SHIV SENA
BHARATIYA JANATA PARISHAD
SANT SAMITI
HINDU MAHASABHA
BAAJRANG DAL
LEADERS OF FANATIC GROUPS
L.K. ADVANI
ASHOK SINGHAL
BALA SAHEB DEVARAS
BAL THACKERAY
A.B. VAJPAYEE
SAVARKAR
BAIKUNTH LAL SHARMA "PREM".
PROF. BALRAJ MADHOK
THE SHANKARACHARYA OF PURI, NIRANJAN DEV THEERTH.
VARIYAR - VISHWAN HINDU PARISHAD.
RAMA GOPALAN
DHARMALINGA NADAR
CHO RAMASAMY
Ghazi
Facts Are The Authority!
RASHTRIYA SWAYAM SEWAK SANGH (R.S.S.)
Dr Keshav Baliram Hegdewar, a Sithpawan Brahmin, was the founder of R.S.S.
Today they have grown very powerful and are threatening the unity of India.
Many of us are not aware of the policies and principles of R.S.S. e.g.:
- Women cannot become members of the R.S.S.
- The R.S.S. opposes the women's voting right.
- Only SITHPAWAN BRAHMINS (Blue eyed people - generally identified by low caste Hindus as "Cobras") can become top leaders of the R.S.S.
- It opposes Communism, Sikhism, Christianity and Islam.
- It's main principle is that the Aryans (Brahmins) should rule India.
- It is an Anti-Dravidian movement.
- All sorts of terrorist training are given to its members.
- It supports "Sati" (Widow burning).
- Its aim is to make Sanskrit the national language of India,
- It specialises in creating rumours and brainwashing people.
The Achievements of R.S.S.
- The Assassination of Mahathma Ghandi. (The reason for his assassination was that he preached inter-communal harmony and equality amongst people, including the low caste Hindus.
- The attempt to kill Dr Ambedkar by poisoning him.
- The attempt to kill Mr Kamaraj Nadar.
- The attack on Mr Karpoori Tagore (this was because he was from the barber profession and community).
Recently the R.S.S. has been recruiting retired police and military officials to
take charge of their massacres.
SHIV SENA
"Garv se kaho hum Hindu hai" (Say proudly we are Hindus!) is the latest call of
Shiv Sena. It is not in the name of India and its welfare, but it is in the name of
Hindu fanaticism.
Balasaheb Thackery's (the founder of Shiv Sena) first aim was to force the
Malayalis, the Tamils and the Kannadigas to leave Bombay. As this did not attract
much support, he switched his hatred to the Sikhs, Christians and Muslims.
Oh Hindu! instead of fighting the Sikhs, Christians and Muslims, why don't you
fight the caste system? Instead of saying proudly, "we are Hindus!", let us say
proudly, "We are Indians!"
THE PROVINCIAL ARMED CONSTABULARY
(PAC)
This is one example of Militant Hindu Police (pro RSS) working under the banner
of the Indian Police Force. So far not even a single non-Hindu member has been
recruited to this group which receives higher pay and better facilities from the
Government of India.
Mr Khuswant Singh has the following to say in the "HINDUSTAN TIMES" on
this subject:
"It is no longer any secret that the loss of life in both Delhi and Meerut was
predominantly Muslim and the majority of victims were killed by bullets fired by
the police and the Provincial Armed Constabulary. Our government controlled
media tried to camouflage this ugly truth."
A private independent enquiry revealed that the RSS Chief (Ex D.I.G. of police)
had masterminded the Meerut massacre and executed the plan.
THE AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT ON
"MEERUT" MASSACRE
Reuters reported the following on the 19th November 1987:
"Amnesty International has concluded that there is strong evidence that members
of the Provincial Armed Constabulary were responsible for the Muslim massacre
and the deliberate killing of unarmed civilians during the riots and following
days. There is also evidence to suggest that at least five Muslims arrested in
connection with the rioting died in jail mainly as a result of injuries inflicted upon
them after arrest."
The report added that witnesses had charged PAC officers (all Brahmins and
High caste Hindus) of herding Muslims into trucks and later shooting them dead.
Their bodies were then tossed into canals and rivers.
THE NEWS BLACKOUT BY
THE BRAHMIN MEDIA
All the Brahmin controlled newspapers and Government media have
wholeheartedly blacked out the Amnesty International Report. It was only
published by the Western media.
THE PLIGHT OF THE LOW CASTES
- THE "Untouchables ARE NOT HINDUS"!
So says THE SHANKARACHARYA OF PURI whom the Brahmin worship as
their "great leader" (India Express April 4, 1989).
Balasaheb Deoras (RSS Chief) and Bal Thackeray (Shiv Sena chief) should go
and correct Shankaracharya of Puri before begging untouchable Harijans for
support.
According to Manu (A Hindu Holy Book) it says:
- The Shudras belong to the same category as crows, frogs, ducks, moles, dogs or transport animals and have the same disabilities as members of their category.
- It is permissible for a member of the high caste to expropriate the wealth of a Shudra by deceit.
- The different castes shall pay interest at different rates, the lowest will pay the highest rate.
- A Shudra's witness is not normally to be accepted when there is no witness of a "twice-born" person.
To get a strong foothold in India, the Brahmin divided the sons of India into various
different castes. According to a recent government survey there are more than 2,000
castes in India. Each caste claims superiority over the other, a man from one caste will
not marry a girl of another caste, no two castes congregate together........ and so on.
See page 79 [SECTION VII, The Hindu Gods].
BONDED LABOUR
Brahminism and the Vedas have the way for the bonded Labour System in India.
After 40 years of independence we still can't save the low caste Shudras from this
bonded labour.
The Times of India reported on 10th May 1987 that Swami Agnivesh, President
of the Bonded Labour Liberation Front, said that more than 20,000 people,
mostly Harijans and Adivasis, were still being exploited and were leading the
lives of slaves in the West Champaran and Gopalganj districts of North Bihar.
This he proved to the Government with unassailable evidence.
We are living in the 20th century where science and technology have advanced
unprecedently and yet, in some parts of India, even today a low caste Hindu
cannot pass along a street from one end to the other without first having his
chappals removed and placed on his head. Hotels and other eating places also
maintain separate cutlery for low caste Hindus.
The First Indian Governor General and Ex-Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu Mr.
Rajagopalachari, alias Rajaji, advocated that people should pass down through
generations the professions of their father and forefathers in order to reduce
unemployment. This suggestion was highly praised by many newspapers owned
by Brahmins/ RSS.
The reasoning behind this advocacy was to keep the low castes tied down to their
menial jobs while the Brahmins maintained their high positions.
Why are the so called low caste Hindus financially destitute? Why is India economically
backward? It is because the Brahmins do not allow others to progress. They hold high
offices in government, control the news media, educational system etc. How
could others possibly rise up, and break free of the caste system bondage?
Needless to say, with all the facilities at their disposal they produce brilliant
scientists, doctors etc. Assuredly even the low caste Hindus could do this if they
were provided with the same facilities.
Ghazi
Facts Are The Authority!