Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

Sri Lankan atrocities mired in web of opacity
*By Peter Apps

*Dozens of schoolgirls killed by the air force, Muslims massacred by Tamil Tiger rebels, civilians targeted by both sides. There is no shortage of atrocity tales in Sri Lanka, but getting the truth is proving almost impossible…

Daily Times

Just because the minority Muslims join the peace loving Bhudhist Sri Lankan government.. Hindu Terrorists think Muslims should be massacred too?

What if Jews started helping the peace loving Bhudist Sri Lankan government… will Hindu Terrorists ifind it justifiable to ignite a holocaust?

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

I didn’t get one thing PD :Dyou please answer this honestly. Why do only Pakistani people call Indians a Hindu terrorist ??? why not others ???. Have you ever heared from anyone else except Pakistaniz about this “Hindu terrorists” ?? :hoonh:

You know what I feel from inside, I tell you very honestly coz that is a fact. Pakistan has been exposed as** a hub of terrorists. **So I think people of Pakistan specially like you PD cant tolorate this reality :hoonh:… I’m sure tumhe nini karte hue bhi sapne aate honge ki why why why only Pakistan not India ??? m i right PD :DPlease dont mind but this is a fact and reality on ground. If not today but tommorow, you’ll have to admit this reality coz you cant run from this reality for so long, till then you can take dreams PD mere bhaijaan lol..

You know what PD last line for you “A jealous person punishes himself because he creates a fire of jealousy within his own heart”

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

So what? If every second person is afraid of their thought process and generalise them as terrorists.
He has all rights to call us (and people of other communities) as ‘Terrorists’ for a balance.

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

I think he’s referring to the Tamil Tigers. Also, Pakistani’s don’t call Indians “Hindu terrorists” as you claim. If an individual, group, etc is committing acts of terror, then they are assuming the responsibility of being labelled as terrorists.

A good example of this would be the **Front de libération du Québec, **which was a terrorist group in Canada aimed at making Québec an independent state. Hence, individuals of this group were referred to as “French Terrorists.”

You should read the Toronto Sun from Wednesday Aug 23rd. The front page headline read “Terror Hub”… the article was about a group of Tamils arrested in Toronto for smuggling illegal arms to the Tamil Tiger Rebels in Sri Lanka. This term was mentioned on numerous occasions.

The fact of the matter is, a terrorist is just that: a terrorist. They cause terror based on them belonging to a certain group or demographic, which forces people to label them based on their represntation (i.e. Jewish terrorist groups in present-day Israel during the 1940s).

You’d be living in a shell to deny the reality of religious and sectarian violence in India (especially in Gujrat). I agree that Pakistan has been “exposed as a terror hub” to the mainstream media. Pakistan definetley has a larger ‘terrorism’ problem on the international level, but just as there were terrorists in Ireland (i.e. IRA with the protestants vs catholics) and Indonesia (East Timor), there are many groups and individuals in India that also terrorize certain groups, sects, religious demographics, and communities.

Indian’s aren’t necessarily the most peace-loving peope either… but that is not an attack at India, rather it’s a fact of life. To live in an environment with mostly peace-loving individuals would be living in a utopia.

And we all know that utopia’s are fictitious.

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

Hindu terrorism as a concept does not exist, coz wherever there are Hindus in a terrorist group e.g. LTTE they are fighting for non-religious causes like separate homeland. Also, Hindus from India & Nepal & Thailand do not go there to support them & fight in their war.

Now, Islamic terrorism is a different thing and is definitely on religious lines.

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

Its wrong to term the Gujarat riots as terrorism. They were communal riots where Hindus killed Muslims in response to Muslims burning Hindus in the train. Would you call the 1947 partition riots terrorism too ?? What happened in Gujarat was condemnable and has no place in a secular country like India. Those guilty (including the politicians) should be brought to justice.

The recent Bombay blasts are terrorism - they were unprovoked, cowardly acts of violence against innocent targets. And yes, it was Islamic terrorism as evidenced by the involvement of SIMI & LeT.

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

Superb reply. 100/100 to you.:smiley:

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

You can play with words nicely :k:

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

So does that imply that you disagree with what was said??`

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

Whats wrong with that?

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

Captain this is not a crossword game :D, now you please tell us what he has said wrong in your own style:halo:

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

PRNR, infinit, hollowman: Lets forget all that, otherwise its all tangents everywhere.

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

Yar kuchh to soch samazh ke likha karo !!

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

Terrorist Hindooos.....

They must be hanged at once...... even those in this forum......

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

Lahori, when you do not have anything to add to the discussion just stfu.
Dont make comments like the ones you made in the ‘Angry Sikhs Attack’](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/showthread.php?t=228240)thread and then run away without defending your argument. You are one of a kind, a true Kafir.

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

Communal riots that result in terror for a specific ethnic or religious community are defined as acts of terror to that specific community, which in this instance (of Gujerat) was without provocation because there was no train sabotage, all was unprovoked. Pakistan is still waiting for evidence on the Bombay train incident.

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

You guys just read & choose to believe news that suits you. Thats why you have such great misconceptions. If you dont believe that the train sabotage took place, what proof do you have of the Gujarat riots ? It happened in India & was reported first by Indian media. So you cannot selectively believe the one that suits you & not the other.

And frankly, why should India provide any proof to Pakistan ? Its India's internal matter.

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

Great idea ! Lets hang all terrorists - and I hope you know followers of which religion come first, right ?:D
You take the cake in bigotry !!

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

Two minds, one vastly superior to the other = pointless conversation. However, to provide evidentiary proof to this nature, I shall continue.

Your own supreme court came to the conclusion the Godhra train fire was just an accident, this is what led to the Gujerat rioting and terrorsm to which Muslims were subjected to by the fecal loving extremists.

http://www.thedailystar.net/2006/03/04/d60304013127.htm

If India cannot provide any proof to Pakistan, it’s accusations (and yours) are hollow bells.

Re: Hindu Terrorits massacre Muslims in the Lankan war

The Timil tigers cant be categorized as Hindu Terrorists... Thats just wrong