Hijacking India's History

Secular India trying to rewrite the history. Are the BJP/RSS/VHP trying to clown the Indians with a pocket full of cookies :D?

A nice read from NY Times.

**Hijacking India’s History **
By KAI FRIESE

NEW DELHI
While some of us lament the repetition of history, the men who run India are busy rewriting it. Their efforts, regrettably, will only be bolstered by the landslide victory earlier this month of the Bharatiya Janata Party in the Western India state of Gujarat.

The B.J.P. has led this country’s coalition government since 1999. But India’s Hindu nationalists have long had a quarrel with history. They are unhappy with the notion that the most ancient texts of Hinduism are associated with the arrival of the Vedic “Aryan” peoples from the Northwest. They don’t like the dates of 1500 to 1000 B.C. ascribed by historians to the advent of the Vedic peoples, the forebears of Hinduism, or the idea that the Indus Valley civilization predates Vedic civilization. And they certainly can’t stand the implication that Hinduism, like the other religious traditions of India, evolved through a mingling of cultures and peoples from different lands.

Last month the National Council of Educational Research and Training, the central government body that sets the national curriculum and oversees education for students up to the 12th grade, released the first of its new school textbooks for social sciences and history. Teachers and academics protested loudly. The schoolbooks are notable for their elision of many awkward facts, like the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi by a Hindu nationalist in 1948.

The authors of the textbook have promised to make revisions to the chapter about Gandhi. But what is more remarkable is how they have added several novel chapters to Indian history.

Thus we have a new civilization, the “Indus-Saraswati civilization” in place of the well-known Indus Valley civilization, which is generally agreed to have appeared around 4600 B.C. and to have lasted for about 2,000 years. (The all-important addition of “Saraswati,” an ancient river central to Hindu myth, is meant to show that Indus Valley civilization was actually part of Vedic civilization.) We have a chapter on “Vedic civilization” — the earliest recognizable “Hindu culture” in India and generally acknowledged not to have appeared before about 1700 B.C. — that appears without a single date.

The council has also promised to test the “S.Q.,” or “Spiritual Quotient,” of gifted students in addition to their I.Q. Details of this plan are not elaborated upon; the council’s National Curriculum Framework for School Education says only that “a suitable mechanism for locating the talented and the gifted will have to be devised.”

More recent history, of course, is not covered in school textbooks. So we will have to wait to see how such books might treat this month’s elections in Gujarat. They were held in the wake of the brutal pogrom of last February and March, in which more than 1,000 Muslims were murdered and at least 100,000 more lost their homes and property. The chief minister of Gujarat, who is among the leading lights of the B.J.P., justified this atrocity as a “natural reaction” to an act of arson on a train in the Gujarati town of Godhra, in which 59 Hindu pilgrims lost their lives.

The ruling party’s subsequent election campaign was conducted against the rather literal backdrop of the Godhra incident: painted billboards of the burning railway carriage. The murdered Muslims were not accorded the same tragic status, although their pleas for justice created a backlash that played neatly into the campaign theme of Hindu Pride. It was, of course, a great success.

The carefully nurtured sense of Hindu grievance has been nursed rather than sated by acts of mob violence: the destruction of the 15th-century mosque in Ayodhya, for instance, or the persecution of Christians in earlier pogroms in Gujarat’s Dangs district. The B.J.P., along with its Hindu-supremacist cohorts, the R.S.S. (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) and the V.H.P. (Vishwa Hindu Parishad), has a seemingly irresistible will to power. (The R.S.S. and the V.H.P. are not political parties but “social service organizations” that have served as springboards to power for B.J.P. leaders like Narendra Modi, chief minister of Gujarat.)

In vanguard states like Gujarat, thousands of students follow the uncompromisingly chauvinistic R.S.S. textbooks. They will learn that “Aryan culture is the nucleus of Indian culture, and the Aryans were an indigenous race . . . and creators of the Vedas” and that “India itself was the original home of the Aryans.” They will learn that Indian Christians and Muslims are “foreigners.”

But they still have much to learn. I once visited the bookshop at the R.S.S. headquarters in Nagpur. On sale were books that show humankind originated in the upper reaches of that mythical Indian river, the Saraswati, and pamphlets that explain the mysterious Indus Valley seals, with their indecipherable Harrapan script: they are of Vedic origin.

After I visited the bookshop I stopped to talk to a group of young boys who live together in an R.S.S. hostel. They were a sweet bunch of kids, between 8 and 11 years old. They all wanted to grow up to be either doctors or pilots. Very good, I said. And what did they learn in school? Did they learn about religion? About Hinduism, Christianity?

They were silent for a few seconds — until their teacher nodded. A bespectacled kid spoke up. “Christians burst into houses and make converts of Hindus by bribing them or beating them.”

He said it without malice, just a breathless eagerness, as if it were something he had learned in social science class. Perhaps it was.

Kai Friese is a journalist and magazine editor in New Delhi.

I see the makings of another pre 1939 Nazi Germany in India.

it is redicoulous to sugest aryan were part of indus valley civilisation
they were dravidians. original people of india were pre-dravidian
aboriginal people then dravidians came followed by aryans.
now everybody is mixed only linguistic groups exist.

by the way whatever we're talking about as India's history here - including the debate about Vedic, Aryan etc - include all the pakistanis also. remember most of the population of pakistan are relatively recent converts to the islamic religion and did not come from the arabic region.

by the same token, such history applies to therefore, Indian muslims also, not just Hindus. In other words, whatever the history is, it applies in equal measures to almost all Indian Hindus & Muslims as well as pakistani Muslims.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Jagjeevan: *
by the way whatever we're talking about as India's history here - including the debate about Vedic, Aryan etc - include all the pakistanis also. remember most of the population of pakistan are relatively recent converts to the islamic religion and did not come from the arabic region.

by the same token, such history applies to therefore, Indian muslims also, not just Hindus. In other words, whatever the history is, it applies in equal measures to almost all Indian Hindus & Muslims as well as pakistani Muslims.
[/QUOTE]

that is the good point . any blame or pride should be shared.
pakistanis cant say they cme from south to north.

Yeah paki's are the same people..most of them atleast. There's still some arab bloodlines here.

As for sharing blame..sharing blame for what ? Trying to change the history ? because thats only happening in India and as such pakistan has no part in it!
We're still taught the same old history everyone else knows.

the point was about the name of the thread ... it is not just India's history - unless you include all countries of the subcontinent and then some in "India:.

the second point was/is that it is really high time we (and I do mean the big WE including all of us sharing this great Indian suncontinent and the heritage) paid some attention to what OUR (again all of us) scriptures and records say instead of blindly following, believing and perpetuating myths created by colonials.

When WE have all these records WHY DO YOU OBJECT TO looking at them and learning your and my correct past?

Any baby can poke a million holes into the various invasion and migration theories - all of them, not just the Aryan one. So why do you want to believe in one particular version? because it is in german or english? what's wrong if it is in Sanskrit or Granth or Pani?

WE have to get rid of this slave mentality and learn to question and become open minded. Otherwise WE will never get out of being played by the west and I don't blame the west for that.

WHY DONT YOU WANT TO LEARN YOUR CORRECT PAST?