Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

I think you missed Iran! Oversight from you? Why do Sunni majority areas in Iran have no local government rights so that they live their lives according to their Faith?

I wish you had read my post with eyes open. (I am quoting myself again for your benefit).

In time of Sadaam Hussein’s the present government was considered as rebels. With power in their hands (bestowed by American power) they are the government.

So-called rebels in Syria will be called the legitimate government soon and I hope you are democrat enough to acknowledge that.

I hope that you will recognise the present rebels in Syria as legitimate government when (Bashar Assad falls) they come into power – It is not going to take that long.

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

That too! Honestly tell me with your right hand on your heart – were you not overjoyed when Sadaam’s government fell? Where you cheering when Sadaam’s statue was pulled down? You will get your answer.

My best friends are Iraqi Shias from Mosul. They were all glued to TV watching the crumbling of Sadaam’s Power all very ecstatically jumping up and down. All this time feasting was going on. I could see relief on their faces see Sadaam go.

Serve their people???
I hope that you are not joking.

Ayyad Allawi, Ahmed Chalabi, Massoud Barazani, Jalal Talabani & co are/were one of the most corrupt people there were around - do you really think the United States would put good honest hardworking people at the helm of affairs to serve the people?

If you do, then you are dead wrong. The United States chose only those who would tow the given line of action.

Do you know that the government installed by the United States was called Ali Baba and 40 thieves?

Read the following:
**
Massoud Barazani, Jalal Talabani Israeli relationship**

Israeli media in 2004 reported about the meetings of Israeli officials with Kurdish political leaders when Massoud Barzani, Jalal Talabani and the former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon publicly confirmed the good relations with the Iraqi Kurdistan region.[7]

Israeli

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

Ahmed Chalabi

Chalabi is a controversial figure, especially in the United States, for many reasons. In the lead-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Iraqi National Congress (INC), with the assistance of lobbying powerhouse BKSH & Associates,[6] provided a major portion of the information on which U.S. Intelligence based its condemnation of the Iraqi president Saddam Hussein, including reports of weapons of mass destruction and alleged ties to al-Qaeda. Most, if not all, of this information has turned out to be false and Chalabi a fabricator.[7] That, combined with the fact that Chalabi subsequently boasted, in an interview with the British Sunday Telegraph, about the impact that their alleged falsifications had on American policy, led to a falling out between him and the U.S. government. Furthermore, Chalabi has been found guilty of the Petra banking scandal in Jordan (see below). In January 2012, a French intelligence official stated that they believe Chalabi is an Iranian agent.[8]

Initially, Chalabi enjoyed close political and business relationships with some members of the U.S. government, including some prominent neoconservatives within the Pentagon. Chalabi is said to have had political contacts within the Project for the New American Century, most notably with Paul Wolfowitz, a student of nuclear strategist Albert Wohlstetter, and Richard Perle. He also enjoyed considerable support among politicians and political pundits in the United States, most notably Jim Hoagland of The Washington Post, who held him up as a notable force for democracy in Iraq.[9] He was a special guest of First Lady Laura Bush at the 2004 State of the Union Address.[10]

Ahmed Chalabi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I hope you know who Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle are - hardcore zionists!!!

Ayyad Allawi

After Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990, Mr Allawi co-founded the Iraqi National Accord (INA), which became known for attracting disillusioned former Baathists, and for its close links with** Western intelligence agencies.
**
With the backing of MI6 and the CIA, the group supported the idea of fostering a coup from within the Iraqi army to overthrow Saddam. But its attempts ended disastrously, most notably in 1996.

His tenure was marked by allegations of widespread corruption, collaboration with the US, and a hardline stance on security - the last attribute led some Iraqis to nickname him "Saddam without a moustache".

BBC News - Profile: Iyad Allawi

Please provide the name of one such Mufti who is calling for mass rapes and murder.

I am giving name of one Shia scholar is extolling shias world around to join the fight in Syria – obviously against Sunnis.

Syrian war widens Sunni-Shia schism as foreign jihadis join fight for shrines | World news | guardian.co.uk

Sunnis scholars can do the same - Match on - Israelis will enjoy watching this - shame

Please don’t credit for what Shias never did. Shias were busy busy ransacking Sunnis homes and ethnic cleansing the areas.

Blowing up Iraqis in markets? You are indeed naïve - do you know “how to divide and rule”

BBC NEWS | UK | Basra drama - how events unfolded

British Special Forces Caught In IRAQ posing as Arabs - YouTube

British Uncover Operation in Basra: Agents Provocateurs? | Global Research

You are indeed naïve - very naïve

Hassan Nasrallah has blundered big-time! From now on he will turn his guns East and North to fight the Sunnis - Hurrah Israel is safe!

Hezbollah has lost its Islamic credentials - It is a sectarian outfit - the mask has fallen and true face revealed!!!

Countdown for the end of Hezbollah has started - what a waste!

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

errr, ok. It will help if you understood the original argument before writing an answer. I truly appreciate your effort though.

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

.

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

Oh Dear, you sound a bit confused now. You read what I had written - Good for you! And I am truly touched by your appreciation. Truly you are a gentleman!

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

Hezbollah don’t take no mess
Pepe Escobar for Asia Times

The “Friends of Syria” are appalled. Their much vaunted “rebel held” stronghold of Qusayr is gone. This BBC headline sums it all up: “Syria conflict: US condemns siege of Qusayr.”

For White House spokesman Jay Carney, “pro-government forces”, to win, needed help from by their “partners in tyranny” - Hezbollah and Iran. Right: so the “rebels” weaponized by Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the CIA, not to mention jihadis of the Jabhat al-Nusra kind, are partners in what, “freedom and democracy”?

Spin out, facts in. This is a monster strategic defeat for the NATO-Gulf Cooperation Council-Israel axis. [1] The supply lines from Lebanon to Homs of the Not Exactly Free Syrian Army (FSA) gangs and the odd jihadi are gone. The Syrian Arab Army (SAA) will next move to Homs and the whole Homs governorate. The final stop will be two or three Aleppo suburbs still controlled by the FSA.

There’s absolutely no way Qusayr can be spun in the West as yet another “tactical withdrawal” by the FSA. The rebels insist they “withdrew”. Nonsense. It was a rout.

This, in a nutshell, is how it happened. Qusayr had been under control of the Homs-based al-Farouk brigade, part of the FSA, for no less than 18 months. Six months ago, the SAA had already cleared the Syrian north-south highway, not far from the city - essential for all Damascus-Aleppo business.

Qusayr was strategically crucial as a key weaponizing depot for the FSA; Sunnis in Lebanon were relentlessly shipping them weapons through the Bekaa valley. So the first thing the SAA did was to encircle Qusayr. Then Hezbollah stepped in - as most of Qusayr’s population of 30,000 had already left for either Lebanon or Jordan.

The final, wily SAA tactic was to allow the Aleppo-based al-Tawhid brigade to sneak into Qusayr to help the al-Farouk. So when these twin top FSA brigades were properly encircled, the SAA pounced. Virtually no civilians were in town, apart from a few farmers nearby. There was no “genocide”.

And then Paris went chemical

When will the NATO-GCC axis ever learn? Hezbollah’s Sheikh Nasrallah staked his reputation by going on air and promising a victory. Once again, he delivered. Contrary to Western spin, Hezbollah did not do it by itself; it was a combination of SAA, Hezbollah and Iranian specialists applying superior tactics and displaying crack urban warfare knowledge.

It’s also easy to forget that a prime wet dream among US Think Tanklanders these past few months was the possibility of pitting Hezbollah against al-Qaeda-linked jihadis inside Syria. They got their wish.

Hezbollah fighters though don’t need to overextend themselves and venture inside Syria further than Qusayr - which is roughly 10 km from the Lebanese border. Their “mission” is in practice to secure the Syrian side of the Lebanese border.

And talk about precious timing; the “fall” of Qusayr totally blew away a monster chemical weapons propaganda orchestrated by Paris. French Minister of Foreign Affairs Laurent Fabius is breathlessly spinning that “Bashar’s army” used sarin gas against the “rebels”. French media is gung-ho for a military intervention. [2]

There is a slight problem though. Buried in sensationalist reports in Le Monde or Liberation is the fact that the French scientific analyses - based on two samples, one of them collected by Le Monde reporters - do not specify who used sarin, the government or the “rebels”. Even UN experts, in their official report, have admitted as much.

So once again - don’t mess with Hezbollah. One can imagine the ear-splitting wrath levels in Washington, London, Paris, Tel Aviv, Riyadh and Doha. Their “response” - or revenge - may include setting Lebanon on fire. The usual imperial courtiers, Brookings Institution-style, are already mourning a Middle East prey to an “aggressive Russian-Iranian axis”. [3] What about the aggressive NATO-GCC-Israel axis bent on totally destroying Syria to install an Islamist, pro-Western puppet state?

The Susan and Samantha show
And now, to compound the drama, we have Susan Rice as the new US National Security Adviser and Samantha Power as the new US ambassador at the UN Security Council. It’s always helpful to remember that along with Hillary Clinton, these were the Three Graces of “humanitarian intervention” that forcefully pushed for the bombing and destruction of Libya.

Whatever replay strategy Susan and Samantha may come up with, Russia and China will veto. Moreover, even the Washington establishment admits all options are noxious. [4] To top it off, Turkey has been plunged into the Taksim/Occupy Gezi/Down with the Dictator maelstrom - and the last thing an embattled Erdogan will be thinking about is to further empower a bunch of “rebel” losers.

As for the Geneva II talks - co-sponsored by Washington and Moscow - their next preparation meeting will only happen in three weeks or so. This means that even if Geneva is on - and that’s a major “if”, considering the “rebels” in disarray are bound to boycott - it will be in early July or even later. Plenty of time for the SAA to keep advancing. But also plenty of time for the NATO-GCC axis to keep denying the “Syrian people” the fateful decision over who should lead them out of this ghastly proxy war.

Link: Asia Times Online :: Hezbollah don’t take no mess

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

^ My dear Pathan Bhai - Is that the best you could do?

Well allow me to return the favour - copy paste an article from a newspaper. If you don’t have time to read the whole article, I have highlighted interesting parts for your attention.

** In Syrian Victory, Hezbollah Risks Broader Fight**

BEIRUT, Lebanon — In the final days the outgunned Syrian rebels, deprived of reinforcements, ammunition and sleep, were surviving on olives and canned beans. They were hiding in the concrete shells of destroyed houses and underground tunnels near the besieged rebel stronghold of Qusayr, unable to help their trapped colleagues and civilians dying of treatable wounds, as Syrian government forces and their Hezbollah allies from Lebanon assaulted the town by land and air.

By Wednesday morning, it was time to flee for the rebel fighters in Qusayr, who had managed to repel the Syrian Army for months but could not withstand the additional attacks from Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shiite Muslim organization whose leader, Hassan Nasrallah, has made common cause with President Bashar al-Assad of Syria in the two-year-old civil war.

In triumphal tones, the Syrian news media announced that Qusayr had been seized, as rebels said they had withdrawn from most of the city but vowed to fight on. Syrian state media broadcast photographs of soldiers raising flags over wrecked buildings as the rebels fled, and the Syrian military was calling the victory a turning point.

But Mr. Assad was victorious not because his military alone had defeated the rebels. Rather, he appeared to owe the victory to Hezbollah, which provided crucial infantry power in recent weeks. Hezbollah’s role and the vengeful reactions of its critics have further intensified sectarian divisions in Syria and beyond its borders, creating new risks for both Mr. Assad and Mr. Nasrallah even in their moment of victory.

“We will not forget what Hassan Nasrallah did,” said Abu Zaid, 40, a fighter from Qusayr. “We will take revenge from him and his organization even after 100 years.”

While taking Qusayr could infuse Mr. Assad’s forces with momentum and embolden him to push for more military advances — just as Russia and the United States are pressing the antagonists in the Syrian conflict to negotiate — the intervention by Hezbollah could be problematic for that organization, which historically has been revered in Syria for its opposition to Israel. Now, in the eyes of the Syrian insurgency and its sympathizers, Hezbollah has turned its guns on fellow Muslims and taken on the form of an occupying force.

In the fight’s final days, as a reporter traveled through villages around Qusayr, rebel fighters and their civilian supporters vented rage not only at Mr. Assad but at his allies — particularly Iran and the well-trained Shiite Muslim fighters of Hezbollah, whom they largely blamed for the casualties they had suffered.

The mostly Sunni activists and rebels expressed bitterness toward Shiites generally, but they reserved particular anger for Mr. Nasrallah. The Hezbollah leader had exhorted his followers to come to fight in Syria against what he portrayed as a jihadist-Israeli conspiracy to topple Mr. Assad and subvert Hezbollah’s ability to attack, or defend against, Israel.

The many religious and ethnic groups living in an area stretching from Qusayr across the nearby border into Lebanon have long been entwined in business and familial relationships. Now many Sunnis there said they felt betrayed by Hezbollah, which they had once exalted because its fighters had helped end Israel’s long occupation of southern Lebanon in 2000.

Families in Qusayr and surrounding villages say they remember sheltering many Lebanese refugees during Hezbollah’s war with Israel in 2006. One resident, Abu Mahmoud, 50, led the way along back roads that he said he once used to smuggle weapons to Hezbollah. Now, he said, he was using the same routes to furnish weapons and fighters to the insurgents battling Hezbollah in Qusayr.

One activist, Mohammed al-Qusairi, said Hezbollah was “placing a burden on the shoulders of generations” of Shiites, like the one borne by Germans after their leaders “committed massacres against the Jews.”

The events in Qusayr added to an array of Syria developments on Wednesday that suggested the conflict, which has left more than 80,000 people dead, would worsen and widen as it enters its third year.

A meeting convened by American, Russian and United Nations officials in Geneva aimed at finding a way to hold peace talks was adjourned in failure, with no agreement on even who among the Syrian antagonists would attend. Lakhdar Brahimi, the special Syria envoy of the United Nations, said that the officials would hold another meeting June 25 and that “evidently, there is still a lot of work to do.”

Worries about the use of sarin nerve gas in the conflict intensified, as Britain joined France in asserting that the evidence of such use by Syria’s government was more persuasive. The statements confronted American officials with the possibility that Mr. Assad had crossed what President Obama has called a “red line” that could prompt a more assertive American intervention.

Reflecting concern about a spill over in the war, Jordanian officials said that they had asked the United States for Patriot antimissile batteries and fighter jets to bolster their defense abilities in the event of an attack from Syria, their northern neighbor. A Pentagon spokesman, Army Col. Steve Warren, confirmed the request and said Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel “will favorably consider it.” Further underscoring the volatility of the conflict, Syria state news media suggested that the fight there might not be completely over, and said the military was still sweeping northern Qusayr for militants.

During the reporter’s visit, before Qusayr fell, the rebels proudly described the preparations that had allowed their outnumbered force to hold off the assault for longer than expected: tunnels that enabled them to slip in and out of the town; underground command rooms stocked with food, water and drugs; booby traps and mines; even cameras that monitored their attackers.

“We got this experience from Hezbollah’s tactics against the Israelis,” said Abu Ali, a fighter in the nearby village of Hamediyeh who, like most people interviewed, gave only a nom de guerre for safety. “Today we are using the same tactics against Hezbollah.”
Despite their bravado, fighters around Qusayr said they felt alone, exhausted and abandoned in the face of a more powerful opponent. Strikingly, some seemed to borrow from Hezbollah’s history: embracing a sense of dispossession and grievance that they said would be felt for generations.

That feeling is familiar to Shiites, who still mourn the defeat and death of the revered Imam Hussein in a seventh-century battle against what they viewed as the oppressive faction that would become known as Sunnis. In Qusayr, as the rebels saw it, Shiites were the oppressors.

“The Shiites shout at us that we are the killers of Hussein,” Abu Zaid said. “We will call them the killers of women and children.”
Underscoring the challenge of ever stitching Syria back together, mostly Sunni activists and rebels expressed anger in sectarian terms. Shiites, they said, were arrayed against them with other sects, including Alawites, the sect of Mr. Assad, whom they accuse of attacking Sunni civilians; and Christians, who they say have remained silent on the excesses of the government’s crackdown.

The bigger picture is more complicated. Though it is difficult to gauge events in an area where access has been limited by fighting and government restrictions, sectarian fighting, with attacks by both sides, seemed to begin a year ago. Shiite and Christian civilians, like many Sunnis, have fled to Lebanon, saying they, too, have been attacked and driven from their villages, by Sunni rebels.

The situation inside Qusayr had grown especially desperate in the past few days as the government refused to admit Red Crescent workers until military operations ended.

When his makeshift hospital was bombed, Dr. Qassem al-Zein said, he moved his patients to houses and basements, without oxygen, anaesthetics or antibiotics. There was little to offer more than 1,300 wounded people but the blood that others donated as often as possible, said an activist, Ammar.

“Those who are wounded,” he said, “can certainly expect to become martyrs.”
Rebels said they had managed to evacuate some of the wounded, although there were fears of reprisals against those who remained.

“Yes my brothers, it is one round that we lost,” the Qusayr Coordinating Committee, an antigovernment group inside the town, said in a posting on its Facebook page on Wednesday. “But war is a drawn out competition.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/world/middleeast/syria.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

You can clearly see that Hassan Nasrallah has blundered by talking sides with a tyrant hell-bent on killing people just to stay in power for the sake of minority sect. He has shown his sectarian face.

For now on his fight will be with Sunnis - He had a great respect among Sunni masses as a ‘Champion of Islam’ resisting Israel.

Siding with the tyrant Assad he has shattered and lost that respect. He has won a battle and now has a long fight on his hands.

Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

Yes that tends to happen when you get chased out of a battleground with your tail between your legs. Rage and humiliation... that too from takfiris.. who not only call shias kafir and are happy to kill them, but have occupied that town deliberately to block hizbullahs corridoor of arms, and have ethnically cleansed shia villages.

So im not sure mr hassan nasrallah will lose sleep over the fact that these takfiris and their allies are licking their wounds whilst shaking their fists in vengeance. They have tolerated these sorry excuse for human being for 1400 years now, another 100 years will not bother them.

As for syrian public, when the majority are supporting assad over takfiris as mentioned by the latest study, then he has nothing to worry on that ground either.

Finally, it it not hizbullah showing thier sectarian face, but those threatening shias on the basis of hizbullahs action. They have been exposed. Hezbullah has continuously helped syrian sunni refugees in lebanon with housing, security everything. So lets not pretend its the other way around.

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

Analysts: Foreign militant Islamists streaming into Syria to face Hezbollah | McClatchy

Analysts: Foreign militant Islamists streaming into Syria to face Hezbollah
Share on linkedin Share on reddit Share on stumbleupon Share on tumblr Share on delicious Share on digg Share on pocket Share on instapaper Share on evernote
email this story print this story jump to comments
By Hannah Allam | McClatchy Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — Foreign Islamist extremists are streaming into Syria, apparently in response to the Shiite militant group Hezbollah’s more visible backing of Syrian President Bashar Assad, a development that analysts say is likely to lead to a major power struggle between foreign jihadists and Syrian rebels should the regime collapse.

Researchers who monitor the conflict said this week that they’ve detected the influx of foreigners in firsthand observations on the battlefield, spotting them in rebel videos posted on the Internet, observing a recent spike in reported deaths of foreign fighters and studying their postings on social media sites.

And while many foreign fighters have been absorbed into established Syrian rebel groups, there are signs now that an increasing number are remaining in free-standing units that operate independently and are willing to clash with other rebels and Syrian communities to implement their own rigid vision of Islamist governance.

“The numbers are increasing, with more radical groups inside now,” said Salman Shaikh, director of the Brookings Institution’s Doha Center in Qatar.

Elizabeth O’Bagy, an analyst at the Institute for the Study of War who just returned from a two-week research trip to study rebels inside Syria, said that “without a doubt” she saw far more foreign fighters than on her previous trip two months ago, including foreigner-only fighting groups in northern Idlib province, near the border with Turkey.

“There were substantial groups of foreign fighters that we came across, way more than I remembered,” O’Bagy said. “And we heard a lot of commanders complaining about foreign fighters coming in and not working with other opposition groups.”

Examples of those conflicts appear to be more frequent.

On Friday, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a pro-opposition research center in London, posted a video from Aleppo on its Facebook that purportedly shows members of the Nusra Front, a fighting group manned in large part by non-Syrians, replacing a Syrian revolutionary flag with the black flag associated with their al Qaida-aligned movement. The Observatory noted that “local civil activists have voiced much anger as a result.”

Another illustration of jihadists pushing boundaries, O’Bagy said, was the attempt to rebuild a working courts system in a town in northern Idlib. After negotiations, she said, local administrators and Syrian rebels had agreed that ordinary criminal matters would pass through the civilian court system, while the rebel brigades would deal with regime defectors and other war-related cases.

The project – exactly the kind of nascent governance the U.S. and other powers want to see in opposition-run territories – was undermined when a group of foreign jihadists came to town and took over justice matters, trying suspects based on their own strict interpretation of Islamic law, or Shariah.

“They’d spent quite some time writing up agreements and then these foreign fighters came and disrupted it. They were going with Shariah and undermining the division of labor,” O’Bagy said.

Even more ominous was how O’Bagy said the villagers wanted to resolve the problem: “Give us weapons.”

While foreign combatants have long been a fixture of the Syrian conflict, analysts said they expected the Sunni Muslim influx to grow in reaction to the Shiite Muslim group Hezbollah’s bigger role in shoring up President Bashar Assad’s forces. In May, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah pledged “tens of thousands of fighters” to defend Assad’s regime. Those fighters were considered crucial in the two-week-long battle over the strategic town of Qusayr, which fell to Hezbollah and Syrian government forces this week after more than a year in rebel hands.

Nasrallah’s justification for joining the war made mention of all the foreign jihadists who’d poured into Syria to fight for the rebels – an uncomfortable truth for the Obama administration as it struggles to come up with a Syria policy that bolsters moderates while isolating extremists.

Latest figures from the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which is generally regarded as the most authoritative recorder of Syrian casualty figures, showed that 2,219 foreigners have been killed fighting on the rebels’ behalf since the conflict began. That’s more than the 1,965 dead who were identified as defectors from the Syrian army.

“Meanwhile, Hezbollah’s involvement was considered a foreign interference,” Nasrallah scoffed in his speech last month.

Immediately after Nasrallah’s speech, Sunni clerics across the region issued a chorus of sectarian-tinged calls for men to head to Syria to help their Sunni brethren against the Shiite “Party of Satan” – a play on Hezbollah’s name, which means “Party of God” – and Assad’s minority Alawite sect.

The most prominent was Sheikh Youssef al Qaradawi, a Qatar-based cleric with a millions-strong following and close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. News reports quoted him as telling a rally in Doha that “every Muslim trained to fight and capable of doing that” should make himself available for jihad against Assad and Hezbollah.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if we’ll see higher flows, especially after the statement of Qaradawi,” said Aaron Zelin, who researches militants for the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and blogs about them at Jihadology.net. “He’s a pretty popular mainstream cleric in the region. He’s not fringe, he’s got weight behind him.”

Charles Lister, an analyst at the Terrorism and Insurgency Center of IHS Jane’s, a defense research firm, said at least eight other clerics have issued similar appeals, and the impact can already be seen. Lister, who closely watches jihadist forums, said he’s noticed an unusual spike in the number of deaths of foreign fighters; six were reported on just one day earlier this week.

“That makes it likely there’s been an increase,” he said.

Lister said his research shows that the majority of foreigners are still fighting in tandem with the rebels rather than branching out on their own, but he added that trends could change as more Sunni volunteers cross into Syria to fight in what’s rapidly becoming a truly sectarian war.

“This is just the start,” Lister said.

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

Hezbollah is also foreign Islamist militant in Syria....no matter how much you twist your words.

Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

And...? Nobody claimed they were syrians in disguise..? But you guys were def in denial over foreign radicals fighting assad as insignificant in number. This article proves you wrong.

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

Peace Ma Mooli

The Syrian regime is not Shi'a ... They will bite you when your purpose has been used up. The best Hajmola has done is to have secured its enmity with the Muslims of Syria. The Alawites many of whom are not involved in the fighting are also not Shi'a ... They are very different ... They deserve to be protected by a Syria that has elected its own leader and one that gives all its minorities as equal rights as the majority.

It would be better that Hajmola sided with the Syrian people ... Who are mostly moderate Sunnis without any idea of sects ... Remember Syria has been a socialist country for years and they gradually lose these sectarian values. For some reason the Shi'a rich countries are listening to Assad's fake cry of help and his cunning ploy to use the Shi'a wild card to get help.

Instead of going gun-ho it was the responsibility of Hajmola to find out what was happening. Qusayr was not an area known for the extreme factions ... Rather it was heavy with a mix of Syrian people from all backgrounds ... It is a shame that things like this are happening.

My friend who is now a Shaykh told me nearly 16 years ago that the Sunnis and Shia will fight again ... I was concerned about his statement ... But it seems this is happening ... Now ... This should never have been a sectarian war ... A war about Sunnis and Shias ... This is a national conflict so best leave it alone.

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

^^

How do we really know that Syrian people are against the current president. I think that the Hezbollah leaders would not have been so naive to oppose the Syrian people.

That said, I do not want to take sides here. There needs to be a strong attempt to stop the fighting. People here are more bothered about who is fighting whom and why is'nt anybody bothered about the sufferings of ordinary citizens. Any war, it is the civilians who have to pay the price. I just pray and wish that this madness stops.

I do not believe that by anybody winning this war would make a difference to the lives of the ordinary people.

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

Interesting.

BBC News - Protester ‘killed outside Iranian embassy in Beirut’

A Lebanese man apparently protesting against the role of Hezbollah in the Syria conflict has been killed by gunfire outside the Iranian embassy in Beirut, Lebanese security sources say.
A small group was protesting at the embassy against the Shia movement and its backer, Iran, over their involvement in Syria.
It is not yet known who killed the protester.
Last week Hezbollah fighters helped retake the town of Qusair from rebels.
**‘Partisans attacked demonstrators’**Clashes broke out on Sunday between supporters and opponents of Hezbollah outside the Iranian embassy, on the outskirts of Beirut, a Lebanese army spokesman was quoted by news agency AFP as saying.
The young man was injured in the fighting and later died of his wounds, the army reportedly said.

‘Partisans attacked demonstrators’
Clashes broke out on Sunday between supporters and opponents of Hezbollah outside the Iranian embassy, on the outskirts of Beirut, a Lebanese army spokesman was quoted by news agency AFP as saying.
The young man was injured in the fighting and later died of his wounds, the army reportedly said.

Several other people were injured when Hezbollah partisans attacked the demonstrators, the spokesman told AFP.
The man killed was identified by Beirut media as Hisham Salman, head of the student section of the Lebanese Option party, a small opposition group.
The party’s leader, like Hezbollah, is from the Shia community, however it strongly opposes Hezbollah’s involvement in Syria.
The protesters outside the Iranian embassy in the Bir Hassan neighbourhood made demands for Hezbollah to leave Syria.
“Lebanon has never been so fragile. They are transferring the Syrian conflict into Lebanon. The Lebanese army should deploy on the border to stop Hezbollah from entering Syria,” protest organiser Charles Jabbour told AFP news agency.
The incident underlines how deeply divisive the Syrian issue is in Lebanon and strengthens fears of further repercussions, BBC Beirut correspondent Jim Muir reports.
Hezbollah - or the Party of God - is a political and military organisation in Lebanon made up mainly of Shia Muslims.
It emerged with financial backing from Iran in the early 1980s and has always been a close ally of Syria.

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

And there we have Lebanon ... coming in to the arena ...

Just wondering ... what is Galloway saying about all this? I know he is pro-Hajmola ... and has a soft spot for Lebanon - what is saying about the demonstrators - I'm guessing not much!

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

Most people now realize that there are two bad alternatives in Syria, Assad and Qaeda. Of these, Qaeda khawarij are worse.
May Allah destroy these enemies of Islam. It is the duty of every Syrian to realize the evil that khawarij are, and stop supporting them only for the sake of sectarian hatred.

It is these khawarij who have hijacked the secular non-sectarian cause of Syrian rebels, who earlier were supported even by some Alawites.Islamists said to execute 15-year-old Syrian boy for heresy | Reuters

(Reuters) - Members of an al Qaeda-linked Islamist group in the northern Syrian city of Aleppo executed a 15-year-old boy in front of his parents on Sunday as punishment for what the group regarded as a heretical comment, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.


As the Syrian civil war gets ever more violent and destructive, there is a big beneficiary: al-Qaeda and its franchise in Syria, Jabhat al-Nusra — which is now the fastest-growing al-Qaeda front in the world, attracting fighters from across the Islamic world. Today it’s focused on destroying the Bashar al-Assad regime but its ultimate goals are much bigger, attacking America and its allies in the heart of the Middle East.

Estimates of the size of Jabhat al-Nusra vary but they may now account for up to a quarter of the opposition fighters in Syria. The al-Qaeda presence is stronger around Aleppo and the north than around Damascus but it is becoming a national phenomenon.

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

Respected sister Ma Mooli – A lot of false assumptions in there on your part.

In war battles are lost and won – before they were “chased out of a battleground with your tail between (their) legs” they withstood full assault of Syrian government’s severe aerial and ground bombing for 8 weeks. The defenders of Qasayr ran out of supplies and food rations; more the 500 died around 1500 severely injured. Others left to fight for another day. I am sure they dispatched a lot of their opponents to the other side too.

Your assumption that 100% opposition to Bashar Assad comes from “takfiri” is wrong as they hardly make 5% of opposition. Unless of course you by saying takfiris you mean Sunnis.

Qusayr is a Sunni town with sprinkle of Catholics; an important corridor for weapon supplies for “takfiris” as you would like to call them.

Do you think only shias areas have been ethnically cleaned? In war situations populations move to where they will feel secure and accepted as one of their own.

May be not him but his masters in Teheran sure will start to lose sleep – somehow I have a feeling that Syria is going to be a Vietnam for Iran and Co. I think this has been a clever plan by the ’Powers’ to entrap Iran and Hezbollah in Syrian quagmire. And they have walked into the trap with eyes wide open!

Iran and Hezbollah rather have Allawi rule Syria than overwhelming Sunnis take control.

There is double standard at play again. In Bahrain Iran and co. want democracy – majority rule. The tyrants should be out. This is palatable to Iran and Co - it suits them.

In Syria there should be no democracy – majority should not rule as it doesn’t suit Iran & Co. Tyrant whom even Shias don’t consider a Muslim should rule Syria;this is palatable to Iran and Co - it suits them.

Stating the above proves that deep down in your heart you believe it a sectarian clash who’s seeds were sown 1400 years ago.

Sister Ma Mooli – Overwhelming majority of Syria is Sunni – why would they opt for either Bashar assad or takifiris is beyond me. Similar a study done before 1991 Desert Storm found that 90% people were in favour of Sadaam Hussein. Shias were for Sadaam Hussein too. Nowadays majority of Iraqis nostalgically recall the ‘good days’ of Saddam rule over Iraq than the mess they find themselves.

Syria is Police state. You should know it as I am sure you have been there. I have lived in Syria for 3 weeks and found it very scary and suffocating place. Everyone is followed around by at 3 o4 different ‘agencies’.

Studies are always conducted to come to the desired results.

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

Bro George is never short on opinion. He has been saying heaps about Syria. Here is a couple,

Re: Hezbollah Leader Vows to Fight on Behalf of Syrian Regime

The killing of Syrian people might be denied by some but it’s not denied by me.

I am not with Syrian regime.
I am against their enemies, because their enemies are worse than them.

I was not with Sadaam Hussein.
But I was against his enemies, because his enemies were worse than him. - George Galloway

Sadaam Enemies – Nato, Zionists, Israel, Iran, Jordan, Gulf States, Shias, Kurds etc etc

Sadaam Friends - generally Sunnis at large who were more further from Middle East

Bashar Assad Enemies - Nato, Zionists, Israel, Turkey, Jordan, Gulf States, Sunnis, etc etc
**
Bashar Assad friends** - Iran, Hizbollah and Shias in general

The following is so appropriate

My enemy's enemy is my friend is an old Arab saying. It explains some strange political, religious alliances