Heinous action - Ricky Ponting's effigy should be burned and trashed in garbage!

For those who are keeping score at home:

Day 1 - We are seeing the action live, in the 32nd over of the innings, as the master Shane Warne tossed one up to Aftab Ahmed, who, after witnessing the height and the spin on the ball, gave up on his usual defensive tactics and went for the usual long hop, which most others, quite far from his league, would go for the usual breakfast as well, only in the process of finding an inside edge as the ball kisses his toe and gravitates in the air for the next five seconds, only for Adam Gilchrist to lay his gloves underneath them after making a hand-eye co-ordination for an easiest of catches. The amount of time that this entire proceeding took place is less than the amount of time you could say “Kangaroo”, and the usual Australian reaction was the appeal (appeal, appeal, and more appeal - their entire lives revolve around appeal, as if one is jumping with a parashoot from eight hundred feet in the air and screaming for help from way above). The on-field umpires, Ian Howell and Aleem Dar (God bless his soul against the hatred that is spewing all around him by this nonsense), were unsure and so referred it to Mahbubur Rahman, the third umpire. Initial camera angles and slow motion replays suggested that it did hit the toe of the batsman, but the third umpire ruled it NOT OUT, and one would seem to think that in the first place, it should have been deemed as a final decision, period!

After the decision came through, both batsmen had a sign of relief and one was seen congratulating the other. However, amidst this whole relieving situation, George Bush’s clone literally made his way up to the standing umpire, and started questioning the “legality” of the third umpire’s decision (Remember, it is Aleem Dar so as far as the question of what the decision was - from Australian point of view, it HAD to be out). As was seen throughout the match proceedings yesterday, Ricky Ponting’s body language and facial expressions were that of a 5-year-old kid who was robbed of a candy bar in front of a packed stadium. The result of his heinous antics, the third umpire, who practically took five to seven minutes to make a decision in the first place (regardless of whether it was correct or wrong), was forced to reverse the decision back against the favor of the batter in a space of ten seconds, and the whole thing was over in the blink of an eye, and Bangladesh had lost their another wicket.

The commentators at that time were Sunil Gavaskar and Ravi Shastri (if I am not mistaken). The latter defended the Australians that “maybe” Ponting had the right to walk up to the umpire and “demand” the legality of the situation, but Gavaskar absolutely ripped Australians apart, over and over again. After the incident was over, they repeatedly showed Ponting in the replays walking up to the umpire with his hands in the air and pointing at all different places explaining to him “his” own point of view, which, of course, the entire Australian army would see it right and hang his piece of frame in their kitchens.

God forbid if Inzamam or Afridi were to be involved in such a disgusting crime, we would be facing immediate death penalties with a piece of rope hanging from our neck and a table underneath us waiting to be pulled at the eleventh hour. The cowardly act that Ricky Ponting did during that timeframe should be brought to justice, and he should be banned from playing future matches for a certain period of time, until he gets his head back together and issues an apology statement (Although he would probably go against his words one week later when his team fly out of Bangladesh).

A great batsman, a wonderful batsman, and arguably, the best batsman of modern era. Yes, he is, without a shadow of a doubt, one of the single greatest entertainers and performers of this decade, but without an inch of a quality of showmanship and the complete lack of the spirit of the game which he possesses that takes away from the enjoyment and originality in cricket. The dictator, YES, THE DICTATOR, should be brought to terms immediately, in one way or the other.

Re: Heinous action - Ricky Ponting’s effigy should be burned and trashed in garbage!

A decision has already being made. Ponting is fined 25% of his match fee, no ban :frowning:

http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/bdeshvaus/content/current/story/244619.html

Ponting fined after umpire incident

Cricinfo staff

April 17, 2006

Ricky Ponting will face an ICC disciplinary hearing over his discussion with the umpires regarding Aftab Ahmed’s dismissal © Getty Images

Ricky Ponting has been fined 25 per cent of his match fee for breaching the ICC code of conduct during the second Test against Bangladesh in Chittagong. The offence related to his reaction when Bangladesh batsman Aftab Ahmed was initially given not out following a referral to the third umpire during Sunday’s first day of the Test match.

Ponting was found guilty of dissent by the match referee, Jeff Crowe, in a hearing after the second day’s play on Monday. He was found to have breached 1.3 of the ICC Code which relates to “Showing dissent at an umpire’s decision by action or verbal abuse.”

In explaining his decision, Crowe said: "Although I have sympathy for Ricky I cannot accept his move towards the on-field umpires as they made a move towards resuming play.

“He did not ask for the third umpire to be consulted but when he made that move and spoke to the officials I believe his involvement played a part in prompting the referral. That is a breach of the ICC’s Test match playing conditions, which states that players may not appeal to the umpire to use the replay system.”

The two umpires - Aleem Dar and Ian Howell - had not raised the issue and it was Bangladesh who took the matter further. Earlier, Crowe had cleared up how the event unfolded: “I think he [Ponting] indicated that the word that came from the Bangladesh dressing-room was that he was out and he was just inquisitive as to what went on,” he was quoted as saying by Fox Sports. "But it was not a direct ask that the umpires should review the decision or go upstairs.

“It was a communication problem really,” Crowe added. "In fairness, what we had to say that with the referral upstairs, it should have been highlighted what they really wanted. The number three umpire …] is not the most fluent in English, although he is a very good man and does communicate well, he wasn’t sure really about what they wanted at that point.

“That’s why after what was done, when the decision was first given, the umpires down below weren’t sure he got the right information, or understood what was required. Once they found that information out - that the ball had hit the boot - that’s all they needed to confirm what they thought. That’s why it was reversed.”

Re: Heinous action - Ricky Ponting's effigy should be burned and trashed in garbage!

Oh, shoot me. Shoot me right now.

Re: Heinous action - Ricky Ponting's effigy should be burned and trashed in garbage!

Ah, the memories. During the initial match proceedings yesterday, Wasim Akram was shown sitting alongside Brett Lee and Nathan Bracken of all the people in the world, giving "handy" tips on reverse swing bowling, and just flat-out bowling in general.

And here, in our camp, we have his other half desperate on his measures on cutting the extras column to no visible margin, and Wasim, on the other hand, had to just sit there and "coach" them on how to bowl.

Re: Heinous action - Ricky Ponting's effigy should be burned and trashed in garbage!

25%!!!! outrageous, how dare they fine 25% of match fee, Ponting will be so poor and so pissed! They better reduce it to 2.5%!!!

Re: Heinous action - Ricky Ponting's effigy should be burned and trashed in garbage!

why was inzi banned for one test and 2 (or 3) one-dayers recently????

Re: Heinous action - Ricky Ponting's effigy should be burned and trashed in garbage!

man these sub-continent 3rd umpires are useless
the recent india-england series also had some outrageous decisions given

Re: Heinous action - Ricky Ponting's effigy should be burned and trashed in garbage!

Actually, as much as I blame Ponting for this outrageous behaviour, the umpires today have brought this on themselves. Nowadays, the trend with modern umpires is offering an explanation for every appeal that's turned down. WTF? There is no onus on the umpire to inform the bowler that's not out BECAUSE it hit the bat or pitched outside or whatever.

In the old days, the umpire just shook his head and said not out. Period. End of story.

PS. The fine is absolutely disgraceful, Inzi was banned for a one test just because he shook his in disgust.

Re: Heinous action - Ricky Ponting's effigy should be burned and trashed in garbage!


Absolutely.

Although quite a few would fail to note, the above post, as well as this entire area of surroundings is clearly a case of "double standards".

Instead of stepping on the pedal of equalizer, the entire end-result has been forced as "us vs. them".

Re: Heinous action - Ricky Ponting's effigy should be burned and trashed in garbage!

Heinous action? Burn effigy? Come on guys, lets not over-dramatize the whole thing. Ponting questioned the decision of the third umpire. The decision was reversed (I am not exactly sure what are the circumstances of the original decision). Ponting was penalized for his action. Lame penalty of 25%, yes. Had it been a brown captain, he'd probably be banned for a few tests under the biased ICC referees for showing "dissent" or "ungentlemanly conduct" or some other godforsaken gibberish that ICC throws at all players.

I know Cricketnama at KK is always overflowing with love for Ricky Ponting :p and this is as good an event as any to throw more *anday tamatar *at the arrogant prick.

Having said that, I am always opposed to this god-like status given to the umpires in the cricket field. Yes, I will like to give them due respect so that games progress in a smooth manner. At the same time, I am sure all of us like to have the right umpiring decisions in as efficient a manner as humanly possible. I have suggested it before and I will say that again: cricket should take cues from some other international sports on how umpire/referee human judgement is managed at sports at the highest level. Careers can be ruined by a single mistake by the umpire. This is no laughing matter. There should be a limited number of challanges available to each captain/coach/team against dubious umpiring decisions during each day of the game. Umpires should be treated like human beings that they are, capable of mistakes, and the guiding factor should be to reduce umpiring errors to a minimum. Bad decisions hurt every team, and to say "oh well, it balances out in the end so its all right and should be considered part of the game" is condescending and unprofessional. When we lacked technology to help the umpires, then it was one thing. Now that we have the technology, lets use it.