Headingley Test

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Nakhrey Wali: *

oh but is this a "negative" bowling ? I mean can you ask tendulkar or any batsmen NOT TO HIT any on side ball to OFF ? Can you ask Some batsman not to come down the ground on fast bowler ? My openion is ANY THINGS THAT IS LEAGAL IS POSITIVE.

Suppose for a moment that your statement "Pakistan are equal to Bangledesh while chasing" is true (well just for sake of argument :) ) if opponent's captain wins the toss and he knows this lose link of Pakistan team then will you call it NEGATIVE if Ganguly or any other captain will send Pakistan into bat ??? I'll not just because they want to exploit Pakistan's weakness they are not negative.

To me same applies for Tendulkar and any other batsmen. If bowler know that there is a place where he can bowl and restrict the bastman or upset him he should get full marks for his intelligence of pointing out this spot rather than called as negative.

I bet same bowling line will bowl Ijaz Ahmed mostly on off stump because he is v strong on left. Will they be called negative then too ?

and this has no end if your theory is correct then India creating slow wickets is also -ive , Pakistan doing sonic short pitches and yorkers is also negative and so on.
[/QUOTE]

Dear ,
I didnt invent the word Negative bowling.Dont get into semantics.if you have issue talk to media and critics who call it negative bowling.

Doesnt matter what you call it.No one knows who is a NAKHREY WALI like no one knows who is AQ.I just quoted Media.

Anything legal can not be negative.
Good work by Hussain.
Keep it up! :k:

Indians are just mad that they couldn’t come up with this first.

Who said it is LEGAL ?? Obviously you didn’t read the link I provided. There is a law to penalize the team now.

Anywas - Negative tactics never work - Naseer should know it better, 2 years ago Moin Khan used all tactics (-ve ones) against his team, but couldn’t save the match.

http://http://sports.yahoo.com/m/sk/news/reuters/20020823/reu-india.html

Sachin Tendulkar hammered a majestic 185 not out and put on 249 runs with century-maker Saurav Ganguly as they demolished England’s attack in the gathering gloom of the third test.

The pair gorged themselves in a runs frenzy in the final session, refusing to accept the light in murky conditions as India raced to 584 for four by the close of the second day.

The final session was so spectacular that Rahul Dravid’s 148 earlier in the day and Tendulkar’s 30th test century to overtake Don Bradman’s career total were almost forgotten.

At the height of the carnage the left-handed Ganguly smashed left-arm spinner Ashley Giles for four, six, six, four off consecutive balls, 23 coming off that over, before he was finally bowled for 128 in the twilight by Alex Tudor.

With that, the umpires decided the conditions were unplayable and halted the violence. England had taken the new ball shortly before the end and conceded 91 off 10 overs.

The home side traipsed off at the close looking dejected and weary, having conceded 348 runs in the day for just two wickets and knowing they will face a marathon battle to save the game against India’s spinners.

Tendulkar, who hit three sixes and 18 fours, said: “I was prepared to stay on after Saurav’s dismissal but everyone was finding it hard to see, even the umpires. I wasn’t consulted.”

Skipper Ganguly – three sixes and 13 fours – added: “The light was bad but we had to carry on – the situation demanded it. We had to play our shots.”

India’s ‘Big Three’, in England captain Nasser Hussain’s words, had “come to the party” to save the second test at Trent Bridge, Tendulkar then making 92, Dravid 115 and Ganguly 99.

They returned to the festivities on Friday, only India will be pressing for victory this time to level the four-match series.

ADOPTED YORKSHIREMAN

Tendulkar, an adopted Yorkshireman after becoming the county’s first overseas signing a decade earlier, had been level with Australian Bradman in the all-time list of test century makers at the start of the day. Only India’s Sunil Gavaskar, with 34 test hundreds, has scored more.

The 29-year-old Tendulkar, though, has always argued that Bradman was beyond compare. “He’s not a normal person,” Tendulkar said. “You can only dream of scoring a hundred every three innings.”

History, however, will surely be more generous one day in mentioning the two in the same breath.

As Tendulkar walked off, his former Headingley fans rose to him as one. More can be expected on Saturday.

The touring side had resumed on 236 for two, Tendulkar on 18, after the first 55 minutes were lost to rain. They quickly upped the pace after a pedestrian first day.

Dravid, nicknamed “The Wall”, clipped Andrew Caddick’s first delivery, an inviting half-volley, through the leg side to the boundary for the opening runs.

‘LITTLE MASTER’

Tendulkar, “The Little Master”, responded in kind, smashing the subdued Matthew Hoggard through extra cover before turning the next ball off his leg stump to the boards.

England, castigated for bowling too short and wide by coach Duncan Fletcher on Thursday, were now overpitching.

There were few real chances. Tendulkar survived an early inside edge off Caddick which just missed his leg stump, then Dravid squeezed down on a Tudor delivery, the ball dribbling past his off stump.

Ganguly, “The Prince of Calcutta”, was dropped on 79 at first slip by Robert Key off a sitter as he attempted to cut Caddick.

For the most part, however, it was one-way traffic.

Immediately after lunch Dravid drove three boundaries in Tudor’s first over and things escalated from there.

Tendulkar reached three figures during the afternoon with an on-drive for four off Giles before punching the air.

SMART STUMPING

Dravid finally fell after seven hours when he was tempted to leave his crease by Giles. Dancing forward, he was smartly stumped by Alec Stewart after being beaten by the turn. He hit 23 fours in his 12th test century to make it 335 for three after a 150-run stand with Tendulkar.

The final session turned into a carnival, Tendulkar passing 150 with a leg-side four and six off consecutive balls from Caddick.

Earlier in his innings he had moved up to seventh in the all-time list of test run scorers, overtaking Englishman David Gower’s 8,231.

Giles, meanwhile, ended as bloodied as a spectator hit on the head by a Ganguly six. His 39 overs went for 134 runs.

India lost two quick wickets this morning, Tendulkar fell at 193, while Agarkar went cheaply, both wickets taken by Caddick.

India declared at 628/8.

Engalnds first target a massive 429 to save follow on. Can they do it?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *

Who said it is LEGAL ?? Obviously you didn't read the link I provided. There is a law to penalize the team now.

[/QUOTE]

Then why isn't he being penalized ?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ehsan: *
India lost two quick wickets this morning, Tendulkar fell at 193, while Agarkar went cheaply, both wickets taken by Caddick.

India declared at 628/8.

Engalnds first target a massive 429 to save follow on. Can they do it?
[/QUOTE]

England is 132 for 3 at Tea.
Still 293 needed tp avoid Follow-on.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ehsan: *
India lost two quick wickets this morning, Tendulkar fell at 193, while Agarkar went cheaply, both wickets taken by Caddick.

India declared at 628/8.

Engalnds first target a massive 429 to save follow on. Can they do it?
[/QUOTE]

I think that was very stupid decision by Indians to bat today morning and waste 45 minutes.in this rain effected match this 45 minutes can cost India the match.

India should have declared soon as Ganguly reached his 100.
Now it is an impossible task for India to win this match unless they had Shoaib Akhtar in the team.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Xpress: *
India should have declared soon as Ganguly reached his 100.
Now it is an impossible task for India to win this match unless they had Shoaib Akhtar in the team.
[/QUOTE]

Your comment is dumb because you just wana criticize Indian just because it was india or you dont know facts.Do you know what was condition when Ganguly reached 100 yesterday?
India was playing under floodlight and if India has decalred Nasser would have accepted light(india was offered light by umpire and India refused), and 15 overs could have been lost.So it was smart moves yesterday to keep blasting English bowlers as much as possible and pileup runs.But today morning they should have decaled because there was no-point in making another 40 runs at the cost of 45 minutes.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by andha_qanoon: *

yes thats a big question but 500 will definitly ensure a draw.
Also dual spin attack and pressure of big total can make a difference here.In the whole series english havenot played under pressure so far.
[/QUOTE]

Looks like pressure of big score is working.
**
England 166/6 (58.1 ov)
**

Still 21 overs left today.

Harbhajan Singh 4 2 3 2

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by andha_qanoon: *

Looks like pressure of big score is working.
**
England 166/6 (58.1 ov)
**

Still 21 overs left today.

Harbhajan Singh 4 2 3 2
[/QUOTE]

yes I think bar rain the match is pretty well wrapped up by India.

English are quickly loosing wickets.
India might win this one!

Turbunator on a role, his third wicket!

The guy was on a hatrick earlier on!

This is turning out to be an exciting contest.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Xpress: *
English are quickly loosing wickets.
India might win this one!

Turbunator on a role, his third wicket!

The guy was on a hatrick earlier on!

This is turning out to be an exciting contest.
[/QUOTE]

England 264/9

England all out for 273. India has enforced the follow on.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ehsan: *
England all out for 273. India has enforced the follow on.
[/QUOTE]

England 186/4

England trail by 169 runs with 6 wickets remaining
Looks like India might have to bat again tromorrow.Nasser and Stewart are playing good.

Hussain and Stewart doing a good job and might have cemented their place.
Good job guys!

http://www.cricket.org/link_to_database/PICTURES/DB/082002/038611.1.jpg

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by andha_qanoon: *

England 186/4

England trail by 169 runs with 6 wickets remaining
Looks like India might have to bat again tromorrow.Nasser and Stewart are playing good.
[/QUOTE]

I still think it is going to be an innings win. One of these guys goes, there is not much left. I thought earlier on that India would have won today but Nasser and Stewart played very well.

It is only a matter of time. Tomorrow afternoon is my prediction.

Don't forget Flintoff!

Holy crap! :eek: :eek:

This Ganguly guy is out for some revenge.

*LEEDS, England: Blood pours from the head of a spectator after a six hit by Indian captain Sourav Ganguly struck him during the second day play of the third Test against England at Headingley on August 23, 2002.
*