The war will have been lost if the Taliban regain power, the country is thrown back into civil war, and the instability becomes a haven for a new generation of terrorists.
The term “War on TERROR” itself is flawed. Terrorism is a strategy, its a means. Should we also start a war on guerilla war, kidnapp, or perhaps a war on ransom! I mean the entire thing is so completely inane, only a politician could have come up with it.
At the end of the day, how can you win a war which you haven’t even defined?
And if you kill a few criminals/terrorists today, will you then return to kill their sons, and their sons ad infinitum?
I cant help but feel that while you are of killing terrorists, you are only producing new ones. Arent you feeding the very ideology you seek to quell?
Literacy is great and I wish the Afghans well, but it will all have been for nothing if the Taliban simply rush back in once Nato leaves. The Afghan Army leaves much to be desired. And if independent reports are anything to go by, the loyalty of these soldiers is sketchy at best.