Hamas free second hostage; but two Arabic-speakers still missing

Hamas were supposed to take over the security services after their 2006 election victory, but under US pressure Abu Mazen didn’t do so.

Now that Hamas are finally responsible for Gaza’s security, they seem to be doing a bang-up job of cracking down on crime. Mahmoud Abbas’s police couldn’t free Alan Johnston in nearly 4 months; Hamas freed him within a month of taking over the police. In dramatic style too, with Hamas police arresting key members of the kidnapping group, interrogating them to find the location of the hostage, and then taking decisive action by surrounding the place he was being held and forcing the release.

There have been a lot of other stories about Hamas police bringing the type of laq and order that Mahmoud Abbas was unwilling to bring his people. Hamas raids on unlicenced arms, Hamas raids on drugs, Hamas raids on criminal gangs.

Hamas seem to be successfuly playing their cards the only way they can to win out in the long-run : aware that while they control Gaza, it will be cut off from development, they are gambling that Palestinians prefer stagnation but with the peace & security that Hamas bring, instead the development but with chaos and crime that Mahmoud Abbas and his international supporters would prefer to inflict.

Five days after the release of the BBC journalist Alan Johnston, another high-profile hostage was freed today from the Gaza Strip - a lioness called Sabrina.
She was found malnourished and with four missing teeth during a Hamas raid on the hideout of a criminal gang. Sabrina was returned to Gaza zoo - from where she was seized in November 2005 - and was being fed on minced meat to restore her strength.

Sabrina was only a few months old when she was kidnapped along with two Arabic-speaking parrots. The director of the zoo offered a reward for her return, but there had been little word about her whereabouts and growing concern about her safety.

Sabrina’s captors were reported to be charging people 50p to be photographed beside her.

The animal’s kidnapping was a story that Johnston himself covered before he was seized in March.

It was thought Sabrina was taken as a show of strength by the gang. Her brother Sakher fought off the kidnappers.

At the time of her capture, Johnston told the BBC’s website that human abductions in the Gaza Strip usually ended with the victim being freed quickly and unharmed.

Johnston was released last week in good health after 114 days. Sabrina was held for more than 20 months, and recovered only after an exchange of fire between Hamas militiamen and the gang.

As well as the two-year-old lioness, Hamas seized drugs and a weapons cache that had been the target of the raid. There was no word on the Arabic-speaking parrots.

The releases of both Johnston and Sabrina have been credited to Hamas taking control of Gaza.

Sabrina was reunited today with Sakher at Gaza zoo. “We will start a long, arduous treatment to ensure she can survive,” said the zoo’s vet, Soud al-Shawaa. “She will only eat minced meat from now on so we feel sorry for her … They should punish the criminals who did this to her.”

Zoos have repeatedly been caught up in unrest in Gaza. In 2004 several animals were killed when Gaza’s previous zoo, in the border town of Rafah, was destroyed by the Israeli army.

In the West Bank town of Qalqiliya in 2002, three zebras died of tear gas inhalation and a giraffe was killed during a riot against Israeli security forces.

Re: Hamas free second hostage; but two Arabic-speakers still missing

The following editorial is an excellent critique of both the Israeli/Quartet and the Hamas positions in the Middle East dispute. The paragraph I’m quoting below is the most inciteful I’ve seen in a while and I couldn’t agree with it more.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/08/AR2007070800924.html

In reality, probably the only way forward in the Middle East is for Israel and Hamas to start to come to terms with each other, however provisionally, while accepting that Hamas’s formal recognition of Israel, and Western acceptance of Hamas, will come at the end rather than the beginning of the process. Only if they decide on a full-fledged cease-fire will there be a chance to end the violence – and head off the growing risk of another multi-front war in the Middle East. Only if Hamas agrees to free the Israeli soldier it is still holding hostage, Gilad Shalit, will there be a major Israeli release of Palestinian prisoners. If Israel is to stick to its promise to reduce roadblocks and illegal settlements in the West Bank, it will need Hamas’s tacit cooperation – one suicide bomb by Hamas would quickly reverse any Israeli retreat. And Western governments will find it difficult to do even rudimentary business with Hamas unless Israel goes first.

Re: Hamas free second hostage; but two Arabic-speakers still missing

^
Anyone who expects Israel to sit back and support a cease fire which allows Hamas to stockpile weapons and grow in strenghth is a fool. This writer actually believes that the way to head off a war is by trusting a Hamas committed to destroying Israel, how much dope has he smoked? Take off the rose tined glasses MS if you actually believe such suggestions, it's pure fantasy rubbish.

Re: Hamas free second hostage; but two Arabic-speakers still missing

Hamas always have and always will stockpile weapons, ceasefire or not. They've been consistently banned since the 80s and yet every time there's a confrontation they are better and better armed.

Back in the 1980s Hamas were fighting with little more than knives; Israel tried to control them with force and then by the 1990s Hamas were fighting with automatic rifles. Then the PA tried to control and isolate Hamas with Israeli and Egyptian backing and by the 2000s Hamas were fighting with mortars, rockets, and anti-tank launchers.

Burrowing your head in the sand and hoping that a policy that's been failing for over 20 years will suddently start working will do nothing but prolong the conflict.

Re: Hamas free second hostage; but two Arabic-speakers still missing

^
Sounds like a solid reason on why Israel should take the war to nations who are supplying Hamas and using them as pawns in their proxy war against Israel.

We all have seen what happens when Israel "runs with their tails between their legs", the lesson has been learned

Re: Hamas free second hostage; but two Arabic-speakers still missing

^^

As you can see, even Israel considers that to be too much of a high-risk option to do.

They have 3 options

1) Take the war to other countries and hope that makes them stop supporting Hamas - but Israel, under both left and right wing governments has been unwilling to do this because of the risk of igniting another regional full scale war
2) Continue the current policy of trying to cut Hamas off - which for nearly 30 years has led to nothing but Hamas becoming militarily stronger, better armed, and more popular year on year
3) Try to directly or indirectly engage diplomatically with Hamas

Re: Hamas free second hostage; but two Arabic-speakers still missing

  1. It's simple cost/benefit analysis, with the emergence of deadlier weapons and those with extreme beliefs becoming more organized, more popular, and more powerful the calculation of cost and benefit of such military action constantly changes.

2 & 3. Hamas is no longer an outsider, they are in charge of Gaza and certain polices are going to garner certain consequences. It's much easier to be a terror organization in the shadows of a government than be the actual government and just because a terror organization comes out of the shawdows does not make them any less of a terror assuming they maintain the same violent methods and ideology. If Hamas wants to become legit then they should complete the transformation and remove polices of terror from their doctrine. Thus far the rise of Hamas has been a PR coup for Israel and has allowed them to point and say 'look at what we having been dealing with' and the world in turn has responded in agreement and cutoff Hamas. Having a ceasefire with the current Hamas may have short term benefits but deadly long term consquences.