Re: Guru Nanak and Makkah
He made a journey to Arabia. Dont know about resting with feet towards Qibla, story.
Wiki says that Never did he ask his listeners to follow him. He asked the Muslims to be true Muslims and the Hindus to be true Hindus
**
I dont know how true this is but its on the web, it must be true (
me and my humour, awsome).
Ok lets assume that the quote in red is true (maybe some sikh guppie can clarify that). My question is this thst if you have a true message, why dont you want people to follow you. I can go around and tell christians to be true christians and jews to be true jews, but where is the message here. Yo knwo what I am saying
Now I am not throwing dirt at Guru Nanak. He is the leader of a very big religious faith and I respect him from that perspective. I just want to know that
Same question I have is with Hunduism. If that is the true message/faith/way of life (as Hindus must believe that it is), why the concept of preeching or convertism to hinduism is not there.
I talked to someone and he said “because every human is born hindu by default and then they might live as jew, christian, muslim, what ever, it does not matter. When every one is hindu by default, why to convert them”.
But then one could ask, why to kill them also (as was done in Gujrat to muslims). Killing any human in Hinduism should be like killing another Hindu.
Anyway, I dont know how true the quotes in red and blue are. Need some feedback from Hindus and Sikhs on that