Gupshup Opinions

A new round of sanctions

By teggy

This article was written before the sanctions on Iran were passed

Well so it’s about another step closer to shunning Iran of world finances. The coming week is to mark another set of sanctions on the Iranian regime for their continued development or suspension thereof, uranium enrichment. The goal of course, as always is to put enough pressure on Iran to stop its nuclear activities, no matter the purpose because the trust is just not there.

I have concern for the world safety as well. But, I don’t see the sanctions being productive thus far. Every time the UN Security Counsel slaps more sanctions on Iran, the Iranian regime just gets a boost and more a reason to be defiant in the face of UN Security Council. If the pressure was to work, it would have yielded permanent results by now. Iran is already producing its own military equipment because it knows it cannot depend on the USA for weapons and sale of defensive gadgets. I believe a diplomatic reinstatement between the two countries would open new doors for a better solution where the two parties can sit down, take each other in confidence and move forward. Chances are, Iran will compromise with the US to something that is more workable with and acceptable to the world.

Iranian people already identify with American culture and the western civilization as a whole. All that remains is a proper link to bridge the gaps.

Comments

Gupshup Opinions

What are we doing?

By Rebel X

The way we do business has seen some really dark days. whether its a river in Ohio catching fire, or the cancer rates in some manufacturing areas in China.

I am a futurist at heart always looking for that vision of a more high-tech future where the preset notions of how to live get shattered. Think about the internet, here I am posting my thoughts to people, many who I don’t know aside from their nicknames on the site, and others who I don’t even know exist. How is that possible..again technology, and a vision for future.

So lets tune this vision of future on its side, what is the cost of some of these things and is the cost really worth it? Or could thins be done differently.

Wherever we read we have stories of doom and gloom, yet we can be fat dumb and happy and just not care, trash dump sites turning into mountains, finding out information like nursing mothers in silicon valley have traces of PBDE in their breast milk. PBDE is a fire retardant used in plastics.

When I read warnings like one can only at a small quantity of fish from lake Michigan, because the mercury content is so high.

The solutions, is not governments, they move too slow. There are some admirable moves, notably by the EU as they came up with the WEEE and RoHS legislations. WEEE basically looked at the amount of refuse going into landfills and with there being more electronic items that were getting obsolete at a much higher rate than ever before, all these things were going into trash, into landfills and materials like hex chrome, cadmium, mercury, were getting released into ground, into streams and then impacting the food supply. So they decide to try and bring in a recycling initiative which made manufacturers partially responsible for recycling these items. It was however found that even in recycling these compounds were being released into the surroundings. The solution, stop it at the source, have more responsible manufacturing practices, work together in the entire supply chain to . I was lucky enough to lead the development, commercialization and launch of the first comprehensive global program to deal with this issue. But that is just one such initiative. More are needed.

US seemed to have over 2 hundred environmental bills at federal and state levels that last time I checked. California’s proposition 65 being one that has been in place and has some impact in this area. But would US come up with a more comprehensive nationwide approach? would EPA move from being beyond the bloated politicized entity that it has become?

What about other regions?

As we see news of high levels of lead in toys from China, high levels of lead in plastic utensils that our children…infants and toddlers are eating from, it just paints a worrisome picture.

What else are we reading? The amount of saturated fat in fast food? The nil nutritional value of the super bleached flour they use. The amount of trash shopping bags generate? Hormone pumped beef and chicken? Nitrates..a known carcinogen in lunch meat? HFCS in almost everything we eat? High amounts of sodium?

This is a cost of development, but it does not have to be, BASF has already come out with full degradable shopping bags,

Companies will do what is in their interest, we hear about corporate social responsibility. There are studies how CSR is beneficial for the bottom line. I will tell you however that whatever my friends at netimpact say. I have sat in with discussions with major suppliers and manufacturers, and they see it as just cost..cost and more cost that makes them non-competitive.

The tune of the same suppliers had changed, when the OEM’s they were supplying to made that a condition of doing business with them.

Whats the lesson here? Consumers can do the same..demand, and be willing to pay for (or forcing companies to eat) additional cost for doing things in a responsible manner.

I believe in future, I believe in technology, I believe that businesses listen to the customers. I don’t believe that the governments are independent enough (due to to lobbying groups), nimble enough, or responsible enough to be proactive in this area. After all it will be this August that US will have a Nutritional Quality Index available, and even that came about through private efforts.

Government is not the answer, UN is not the answer, the methodology of doing things these groups follow is one which is known as BOGSAT in my world…Bunch Of Guys Sitting Around Talking (ladies you can replace guys with girls if we feel left out)

Consumer pressure is the quickest way to make businesses react, and find solutions, not government. That is my view.

What do you think?

Comments

Gupshup Opinions

India’s about turn on Tibet as it bans the pro-Tibet rallies

By burqaposhx

India is switching gears so fast that some of the gear teeth are about to break off. They first did an about face to Iran on Gas pipeline, dumped Russia in favor of America, and now Tibet is the latest victim of the pragmatist “India-first” policy.

Tibet has been long held as a trump card by India to pin prick China’s back. Over the years, Dalai Lama has always found a warm bed in India from where he could relax and then launch political campaigns.

Now however things are changing rapidly. India no longer sees it necessary to take on the resurgent China. And thus Tibetan movement is being the axe.

I wish Pakistanis too support our government to update our policies in this fast changing world.

Comments

Gupshup Opinions

Pushing the Muslim buttons

By Mirch

One of the ways Muslim buttons are being pushed is by using hoaxes and urban legends around Muslims beliefs and Quran. The number and frequency of these Muslim legends and hoaxes has increased after 9-11 . Islam and Muslim basher are using them as a propaganda tool against Islam and Muslims. Funny thing is that in addition to references to Islam , Quran they now contain current history and world affairs. A Muslim ,no matter at what level his or her eman is, cannot invent and start these hoaxes. Why ? Because he/she is a Muslim who has already accepted the truth about Islam. But when these Muslim legend and hoaxes reach any Muslim, appearing to be originated from Islamic sources they start to spread like wildfire. Emails and Muslim forums has made it easy for Islamophobes to obtain a Muslim looking email, domain and identity and start spreading these Muslim legends and hoaxes.

The big problem with all this, as I see is, that, when it comes to religion we all behave like lambs and sheep’s. We follow the sheep in front of us without caring where she is leading us.
The prime example is The Qur’an 9:11 Hoax . This is the hoax:

Now note the verse number 9:11. Also Since America is typically represented by an eagle.America invaded Iraq. Saddam was supposed to be son of Arabia and Iraq is supposed to Muslim Country to this is all supposed to add up and prove the authenticity of Islam and Quran. Isn’t it all amazing ? Every Muslim has access to the Quran present in each and every Muslim home. All they have to do is open it and look for this verse and its translation.

But instead of doing that they fell victim to this hoax and started passing this around using emails and posting in Internet forums. I myself received emails containing this hoax from my friend and family.
Another story Which surfaced recently and being passed around very fast is about the discovery and pictures of Rocky Belt on the moon to prove the miracle of splitting of moon.

I believe in this miracle because it is mentioned in Quran. I do not need any other proof. Nobody has to create fake photos to strengthen or weaken my Eman. You can see how fake this photo is by closely looking at it.

Then there is a news which surfaced recently and is still being passed around about Neil Armstrong hearing the Azan on the moon and accepting Islam.

These hoaxes and urban legends are being invented by Islam haters to let Muslims down. They invent them and then later tell everybody that look at these Muslims they are all bunch of liars they are spreading these fake stories to prove the truthfulness of their religion. We are falling victims to these stories instead of seeing through them. Please check these hoaxes before you start to pass them around.
I wish we had a Muslim website like urbanlegends.google.com which will research the origin and authenticity of these Muslim legends and hoaxes and expose the originators and truthfulness of these hoaxes.

Comments

Gupshup Opinions

Racism

By Zakk

“Thank God I don’t live in a racist European country” said the American Desi. A comment I’ve heard in the past praising the level of acceptance American society has towards South Asians.

Whats more is that facts back these comments up, the South Asian community in the US is far more upwardly mobile than their counterparts in Europe. They have achieved substantial financial success, a higher proportion have learnt English and a lesser proportion live in cultural ghettos.

So does that mean North Americans are more tolerant and more accepting of people of a different ethnic/skin colour?

Not exactly, to understand complex issues of racism and intolerance towards ethnic or religious groups one has to look at a greater historical context. What are the origins of racism in a society? The term “Paki” has a distinctively different meaning in Britain compared to the US, it probably has more in common with the n word in the US.

That hits upon the crux of issues regarding race and intolerance. You have to compare like with like, South Asians have no historical association of occupier or occupied with north America the way they do with Britain and it’s colonial past.

To stretch the example further, France has a historical association with North African Arabs. The bulk of social cohesion problems are with Arabs and not with Pakistani’s, this is despite the fact that Arabs from the Maghreb speak fluent French (in some cases as a first language). Similarly in Germany the Turks are discriminated against by the larger society because of Germany’s dominant position with reference to the Turks in the last 19th and early 20th century. If we were to take the example out of a Western world correlation we have a classic example in Darfur of how racial intolerance is often driven by the baggage of history.

Similar examples abound across the world, all of which leaves us with one basic reality, it is not that one place is less intolerant than the other, but that racism is rarely universal, often selective and almost always carries the weight of history with it..

Comments

Gupshup Opinions

Baking the Turkey! Is it worth it?

By burqaposhx

Looks like Islamists vs. secularists tussle has come to a head. It is kind of extreme that Turkey’s chief prosecutor would ask its highest court Friday to disband the ruling party for attacking the country’s secular traditions.

Are the secularists feeling so threatened just because Islamists want to lift the hijab ban? Or they are trying to dam the Islamist tide?

Let’s see what the repercussions for the actions of Chief Prosecutor could be! He is asking to ban for 5 years every major Islamist including the president Gul, PM Erdogan etc. 71 in total leaders.

A simpler outcome could be that the court throws out the case. But if it doesn’t what happens then?

Will these powerful men of the ruling party simply pack up their bags and go home? Or we’ll see a start of Muslim insurgency in the country? In that case what will be done to the Turkey’s admission to EU, or what kind of havoc will it bring to the country’s economy?

I hope the two sides back down in the interest of Turkish people. We know from Pakistani experience, that too much political heat is not good, not for any country. And if this heat is allowed to be fanned by Islamists, it may very well bake the Turkey. And who will feast on it? Only the anarchists and the Islamic militants!

Comments

Gupshup Opinions

Racist or Sexist?

By Faisal

In a recent Bill Maher talk show, result of a survey was discussed which indicated that Americans are more sexist than racist. What it means, in a nut shell, that they are less likely to vote for a woman, than a black man. With all the spin that goes on in US media, results of this survey could as easily be manipulated by one or the other campaigns, but that’s a discussion for another time.

So, is it true? Is America more sexist or racist? Stereotyping is simultaneously a largely meaningless exercise as well as a highly entertaining one. And this time, apparently, it is backed by survey statistics.

Blacks certainly invite many stereotypes, but it was always a struggle to pigeon-hole Barack Obama as a classic black man. He is actually an Uncle Tom type of black man – born of a Kenyan man and a white woman from Kansas, studied in Harvard and has all the trappings of a well-educated and polished politician. No where near the likes of Jessie Jackson or Al Sharpton, whose primary appeal is only to people of own ethnicity. All was going according to the plan till Obama’s moronic pastor’s rabid anti-American tirades became public, and then you realize that at the end of the day, Obama really is part of a minority community that has huge grievances (slash chips on their shoulder slash complexes).

On the other hand, Hillary is hardly an embodiment of a typical woman either. She is tough and she is ruthless. She frequently attracts an unflattering (or flattering, depending on how you look at it) comparison to a certain type of female animal, to showcase that she is un-afraid to take on opponents. What’s womanly about her is that on any given moment, she can through a temper tantrum (“Shame on you, Barack Obama”)](http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-campaign_5sfeb24,0,4350622.story), be sarcastic (“skies will open!”)](http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/clinton-gets-sarcastic-mocks-obama/) or effusive in her praise for her opponent (“its an absolute honor”)](http://youtube.com/watch?v=rvhrh0yHhd8). What I find the most hilarious irony is that in her famous “3 am” television ad, she claimed that she is the best person in a time of crisis. Whereas in her own book, ‘Living History’, Hillary recalls that Monica Lewinsky scandal was the toughest crisis for her, and here is how she dealt with it: “I could hardly breathe. Gulping for air, I started crying and yelling at him”.](http://youtube.com/watch?v=2k5mkXtxw4g) Wonderful stuff. Just what Americans are looking for in a I-am-tough Commander-in-Chief. Yes, there is a difference between personal crisis and national crisis, but I don’t see any evidence how Hillary will effectively deal with any international crisis differently, either.

Point being, neither Obama nor Clinton are classic specimen of either being black or woman, but both have enough baggage of their ethnicity/gender to swing this race. If you ask me, I’d have no problems voting for either a black man or a woman. But I am hardly the best example of a typical American voter. I belong to a minority ethnic community and (gulp!) I’d actually vote on issues. Majority of American voters are still white men and women, and I suspect many, if not most, will vote on much vaguer criteria. So, the survey results may actually be on to something.

Comments

Gupshup Opinions

Pilots, not Air Marshals!

By teggy

The tragic events of 911 triggered a long list of do’s and don’ts. In the race to secure the skies, a law was passed that would allow the airline pilots to carry firearms as a last resort against any breach of the cockpit. While that sounds great; however, it has its flaws. First and most obvious being that a pilot should be concerned with flying, not serving as an Air Marshal in the cockpit surrounded by sophistication of instruments, which if damaged could jeopardize the lives of many aboard the craft.

Well folks, that’s precisely the kind of situation that occurred on a U.S. Airways flight from Denver to Charlotte.

The fortunate thing is, neither the aircraft nor any of the occupants were injured. The gun went off while the aircraft was on approach to land in North Carolina over the weekend. How the gun was triggered is being investigated.

While at it, lets hope they also investigate and look into the dangers of a weapon in the cockpit. Not to mention allowing an otherwise citizen to operate it in need of emergencies.

I’m all for safety, but that is why we have Air Marshals onboard. Handing guns to pilots is a bit extreme. Have we forgotten the incidents of drunk pilots? Would you add to that a firearm and a panicky situation? TSA was never in the favor of such a law to begin with, it was implemented on the insistance of Congress. Not such a good idea!

Firearms should stay in the hands of professionals who are licensed professional and properly trained on how to use them in any kind of situation. You cannot have an Air Marshal/Pilot. It’s just too dangerous in my opinion.

Comments

Gupshup Opinions

Are we the Muslims oppressed?

By Mirch

My observations are that we are victims of self pity. We have nostalgia about a very glorious and distant past. The main difference between the ones who are progressing and those who are not anymore, is like this:

Anything which happens to us is because someone is our enemy, someone is oppressing us or there is a global conspiracy against us. We have no control on our fate others are so powerful that they just do whatever they want to do to us and we cannot change it all – ( it is all my sarcasm not my philosophy)

At certain point in history we stopped realizing problems as problems and stopped looking for solutions. Someone instilled this philosophy in our minds that whatever happens is Allah’s will, so be a Sabir and Shakir Momin and have faith in Allah . Allah ( Subanahu Taala ) will have mercy and resolve our issues. We stopped doing research to resolve the issues and solve the problems. So all the major scientific discoveries, inventions and technological advances in recent history go to the credit of non-Muslims. Just name any one of the modern inventions and discoveries which have a Muslim name attached to it.

There are those in our midst who believe and force me to believe that man never landed on the moon. It is all a hoax and Discovery Channel has all the proofs to disprove a legitimate moon landing. Allah will never let that happen. I know I am going to hear a lot of boos.

I have read myself articles in prominent magazines back home which tried to prove that , rocket and air plane were invented by Muslims. Due to a big conspiracy non-Muslims are taking credit for these inventions. I do not know where they got their facts from because those articles did not contain any references or bibliography. The other day someone was telling during a khutbah that America was discovered by Muslim traders long before Columbus, there is a proof of this in a German/Italian library. and again due to a big conspiracy Columbus is credited with this discovery.

The khateebs at every masjid every Friday spend all their energy to make sure that we do not leave guilt free, They make sure that we should have shame and be depressed about being not an ideal Muslim. I would love if some psychiatrist and/or psychologist does some research on the impact of those depressing khutbas. If I take every word of those khateebs as it is I would have no hope for me on the judgement day, I will have no faith in Allah (SWT) being Rehman and Raheem.(Naoozo billah)

The other day a khateeb was spending his energies in telling the congregation at my Masjid that we all are spending all of our energies on Dunia and have forgotten the Akhrah. We should not worry about the Dunia at all. But I know that this particular khateeb has a thriving business and Mashallah doing very well . Now I do not know if angels are running his business or he puts his utmost energies to run that business. He is in a very competitive market with cut throat competition.( I am not in the same business but a very dear friend of mine is and another acquaintance of mine had to close his business and go look for a job ).

Why can’t we work hard to better our Dunia and in turn use this success in Dunia to better our Akhrah ? How is it possible that we can better our Akhrah without the betterment of our Dunia ? After every Namaz/Salat we recite a Duaa taught to us by Allah where we ask for betterment of our Dunia first and then for betterment of Akrah.

" Rabbana Aitana fee Dunia Hazantun wa fil Akhratay Hasanatun". This is the teaching of our Allah to ask for betterment of our Dunia first , but day and night all the khateebs tell us the opposite and condemn our efforts for the betterment of our Dunia.

So my conclusion is that we are being oppressed by our own ulema’s and khateebs. They have been instilling a very wrong philosophy for ages which even goes against the real Islamic teachings. This philosophy has resulted in our downfall and will result in our doom-- if we still do not change our way of thinking.

Comments

Gupshup Opinions

Israeli decision will hurt everyone in the region

By burqaposhx

Yahoo reports that Israel is planning to build 1400 homes in Jerusalem and the West Bank.

This is going to put more pressure on moderates in Palestinian territories. It will also hurt US’s stance. I guess that’s why Secretary Rice criticized Israel and said —

“Settlement activity should stop - expansion should stop,”

Unfortunately both Israeli and Palestinian sides have and continue to succumb to the extremist parties or groups.

Without having access to figures such as total homes built in all of Israel vs. the number in disputed areas may put some perspective in this difficult environment. However it may not be of help much to Palestinian side that considers even a single home built on disputed territory as offensive action by Israel.

Off course the two sides have to find a compromise somewhere. Otherwise this tit for tat series will continue.

Sometime one feels that the land between Jordan and Sinai is somehow cursed to not have peace.

Let’s hope that both sides continue working on some settlement and achieve a decent environment where the two could live without large scale violence.

Comments

Gupshup Opinions

Anti-China Protesters Need a Reality Check
by LockJaw

Perhaps now Bill O Reilly will hate the French and the liberals a little less. All over the Western world, activists have attempted to protest and even sabotage Olympic processions, expressing their collective outrage at the recent turmoil in Tibet. Not very long ago, in a world where America was still involved in occupying just one Muslim country, millions came out to protest American plans to invade its second terrorist harbouring, nuclear weaponized, chemical weapons on sale to Bin Laden state. Bill was outraged. So was much of America and French fries were renamed to reflect a more palatable ideal. All should be forgiven now, since we now have the collective “how can you kill wee children?” aimed at the Chinese.

Leave aside that China has a territorial claim over Tibet dating back centuries. There are significant numbers of Ethnic Chinese in the region. That the numbers of people killed in the recent events would be a good day in Iraq. Citizens of a country that is currently the occupying power in a country half a planet away, and citizens of a country that has been historically the most brutally aggressive imperial power in recent times, imperialism that was never curbed until the country itself became militarily impotent, feel they have the moral high ground to lecture another country’s handling of its internal affairs. I can understand the French or the Brazilians objecting to Chinese tactics, but not the US and the UK, not the current and historically imperialist powers.

It is ofcourse not enough to try to intimidate and physically harm the Chinese running with the torch. There is talk in the opinion section of papers about boycotting Chinese made products. Hit em where it hurts, right? That magnificent triumph of an idea comes at a time when the US is going into recession, obviously with its vassal states in tow. A time when China is financing America’s debt, to suggest that any economic action against China wouldn’t bring a crushing blow to a debilitated, sterile West is probably only explainable by remembering that these people are still used to thinking that they are the masters of the world.

God help the British when they run with the Olympic torch in 2012. We all know the western world cares as much about Iraq and Afghanistan as it does about Tibet.

Comments