Gujarat Muslims the 'living dead'.

Would a new government bring any relief to the Muslims of Gujrat that had been displaced after the riots? Can the families of thousands of Muslims, that had been killed during the riot, look forward to a better a life? Would there be any help forthcoming from a new government?

BBC NEWS | World | South Asia | Gujarat Muslims the ‘living dead’

**Gujarat Muslims the ‘living dead’ **

Muslims in India’s Gujarat state who bore the brunt of religious riots in 2002 say they have been abandoned by the political parties. The BBC’s Soutik Biswas met some riot victims ahead of the general election in the state.

The acrid smell of burning oil singes your nose and eyes as you walk into Bombay Hotel, a sprawling ghetto of Muslim-owned homes on the eastern flank of Ahmedabad, the main city in western Gujarat state.

A pall of black factory smoke hangs over this untidy patchwork of squat, ugly houses. Residents pay 150 rupees ($3) a month to a private contractor who supplies yellow-coloured drinking water through dirty garden pipes. Sewage flows out into the street.

Bombay Hotel, which takes it name after a local roadside eatery, is one of the places where many Muslims displaced by the 2002 Gujarat riots moved to. Over the past seven years, it has transformed from a remote industrial colony to become a busy refugee settlement.

The anti-Muslim riots, sparked off by the death of Hindu pilgrims in the firebombing of a train, led to the death of 1,392 people in five districts, according to official records. NGOs say the toll is closer to 2,000.
**
Shambolic**

The riots also left some 140,000 people homeless. They were put up in camps and given 2,500 rupees by the government - the majority of the displaced were in Ahmedabad city.

Thirty-six-year-old Meraz Ahmad Jalaluddin Ansari is one of them.

He was lucky that he did not lose any relatives in the riots. He and his family fled their home in the Chamanpura area after Hindu neighbours warned them that the rioters were closing in.

But he did lose his home and livelihood.

He had hired a dozen workers and owned 15 sewing machines. He would make, he says, 15,000 to 20,000 rupees a month from embroidery work.

After fleeing the riots and panic-selling his house to a local Hindu neighbour for 275,000 rupees, Mr Ansari moved into Bombay Hotel.

His living standards are shambolic, the markets where he can sell his wares are now 10-12km away, and his children are soon going to lose their neighbourhood municipal school. It will be scrapped to make way for a bus lane.

Mr Ansari has picked up the pieces again, built a new home and managed to buy about five sewing machines to start work.

He can no longer afford to employ people. The government, he says, gave him compensation of 300 rupees for the damage to his house in Chamanpura.

“Once I was fairly well to do. Now I work a lot more and just manage,” he says. “Life can’t come to a halt. But sometimes I feel we are the living dead.”

The riots do not find any echo in the general elections in Gujarat.

Seven years after the incident, both the ruling BJP and Congress party remain silent on the shoddy rehabilitation of the victims or the delay in bringing the culprits to justice.

“We cannot vote for the BJP and the Congress almost has a fixed deposit on our votes. So it’s a choice between the devil and the deep blue sea,” says Mr Ansari.

There is little talk of the impending polls at Bombay Hotel. When you raise the subject, the residents turn their faces away in disgust.

“Before the 2002 riots, there were just a few houses here. Now there are 15,000 houses and 80,000 people. Muslims have moved in from all over. They feel relatively safe here,” says Shabit Ali Ansari, 32, who owns a sweets shop.

“But no party does anything for Muslims. The authorities do nothing for people here unless we raise a storm,” he says.

Cynical

Barber shops, groceries, sweets shops and even a photo studio that have sprung up in the grubby lanes do brisk business. But residents work on pitifully low wages.

Riot victims like Noor Banu, 45, and her husband, Ashik Ali Badar Ali, 50, who moved here after their house was attacked in the Saraspur area, are struggling to make ends meet.

Mr Ali used to drive an auto rickshaw and bring home up to 150 rupees a day. Now he earns barely 1,800 rupees a month working as a security guard.

Their three daughters chip in making lacquered bangles to help pay back a loan of 70,000 rupees the family borrowed for the two-room hovel in which they live.

Next door, Asiyana Ahmed Sheikh, 12, makes kites. And Zarin Aslambhai Ghanchi gets less than one US cent for cutting and stitching together a campaign banner for a political party.

“Even the political parties exploit us when giving us jobs. This is the state of affairs here,” says Zarin.

Ashik Ali Badar Ali says he is going to vote for the Hindu nationalist BJP, which was blamed for inaction during the rioting.

“The BJP is an open enemy of the Muslims, and the Congress is a hidden enemy. I’d rather vote for the open enemy, so I can go to them for protection.”

Muslims comprise barely 10% of the population in Gujarat.

“Despite the riots and the headlines, the political parties here feel that they can ignore them, because they don’t comprise a decisive vote bank,” says analyst Achyut Yagnik.

Re: Gujarat Muslims the 'living dead'.

By the way - I have never ever seen these cry baby stories about the 500 hindus who died in those riots... Wonder why?

Or the 60 odd pilgrims returning from Ayodhya who were burnt alive at Godhra. THE ORIGINAL incident. Is it because these were Hindu victims?

Now I go into a hypothetical situation. So what exactly would happen if hindus were about 30 million in pakistan. And they were known for terrorism and bullying and destruction and mob mentality in general. Nothing constructive about the majority of them. And one fine day they decided to burn alive muslim passengers in a bus carrying pilgrims from Hajj. Around 60 pious muslims are burnt alive. Including tiny-tots.

Any guesses?

Re: Gujarat Muslims the 'living dead'.

This comment says it all -

[QUOTE]

Ashik Ali Badar Ali says he is going to vote for the Hindu nationalist BJP, which was blamed for inaction during the rioting.

"The BJP is an open enemy of the Muslims, and the Congress is a hidden enemy. I'd rather vote for the open enemy, so I can go to them for protection."

[/QUOTE]

Since 2002, there has not been any communal riot in Gujarat. I think that says a lot for a so-called "anti-Muslim" state.

Re: Gujarat Muslims the 'living dead'.

Wow - so my post gets disemvoweled. And some of my other posts get deleted.

I must be hitting home. Hard. :)

Re: Gujarat Muslims the 'living dead'.

I really wonder if this BBC's Soutik Biswas has ever met the family members of the people burnt alive in Godhra train carnage?

Im sure they were well compensated by the govt...

Maybe its because there havent been any other Godhara like incidents? The Muslims havent rubbed the majority the wrong away.

So atleast you agree that they rubbed the majority the wrong way i.e. Godhra, burning of Hindu pilgrims etc.

Looks like we are making progress here....:)

Re: Gujarat Muslims the 'living dead'.

Only if their forefathers understood the two nation theory.....

Re: Gujarat Muslims the 'living dead'.

So Pakistan does not have riots ? Whether its a Hindu Muslim riot or a Shia Sunni one, its still a riot.

As for the two nation theory, we have seen whats happened over the years :p I am sure the Gujarat muslims are glad their forefathers did not understand the two nation theory.

What does this mean? Could you elaborate?
I am an indian btw.

Well first of, as far as I know, its never been proven that the Muslims were guilty of committing the act in question.

Second, even if they were, are you implying that this somehow justifies the murder of 2000 people who had nothing to do with it? And did the pseudo secular govt of India have no responsibility of protecting these people?

Third... My statement is in line with your former pm Vajpayee statement. I believe he said that the welfare of the minority rests on the goodwill of the majority... Basically, the rights of Indian minorities is not guaranteed by the constitution etc, but on the whims of the Hindu mobs.

All I can say for you is, atleast your honest, and openly prejudiced. Thats progress:)

Are you kidding me! These peoples lives were destroyed!
If these peoples forefathers had done the right thing and joined their people in Pakistan, they would still have homes.

We have seen what happened over the years. People like u exemplify the fears that led to the creation of PAKISTAN.

The minority victims have also been compensated but this section is master in 'playing the victim' game.

Muslims have never accepted any guilt thruout centuries.

Sorry...killing are never justified......but what your religiout texts say on this topic....you justify revenge?

Vajpei has never said so....what i say it is minorites' imagination to make noise for their 'play the victime' game.

Peace!

lol...Now your giving me lessons on Islam! Ironic much?!?!

Muslims have as much to be guilty for as your ancestors do when the invaded India and imposed their brutal system of apartheid on the population.
As for Godhara however, you know as well as I that guilt has never been extablished.
In a civilized country, guilt is established through the procurement of evidence.
But then India isnt all that civilized now is it!

Islam doesnt try to justify Murder, but then what would someone like you know.
I suggest you actually read up on Islam. Your ignorance is disgusting.

And Vajpayee did say so. Infact this line has been repeated by many of your fellow extremists.
Bottom line is, as far as people like you are concerned, and your govt, India is a Hindu state..
To be honest, im glad. Pakistan was made with this understanding in mind.
Its sad that the Gujrati Muslims continue to be victims of this Hindu state.

Yeah, im sure every one among those bloody minorities is a liar...

Your insensitivity is astounding!

You people cry for your beloved Pundits im sure, but Muslim victims of Hindu extremism are dismissed as just "this section."

For as bad as Pakistan may be at this point in History, im certaily glad we have country in which we dont have to be beholden to the arrogance of the Hindu Raj.

Sunni-shia fasaad doesn't result in so many people killed. Had Gujjarat people understood two-nation theory in 1947 and opted for Pakistan instead of India, this tragic event would not have taken place.

and i was told wise ppl only need a hint.

What makes you think they did not understand the two nation theory ? Maybe they understood it and rejected it in 1947. And the two countries' track record in the last 62 years proves that they were right in rejecting the two nation theory :p

Now you can go to town justifying the creation of Pakistan, but the fact is that it has not achieved whatever it was intended to achieve by its creators and is on the brink of failing.