Guess which country is a Rogue State?

Why India Qualifies to be Declared a Rogue State
http://www.satribune.com/archives/feb03_09_03/opinion_rogue.htm
Anwaar Hussain

THE US policy makers define a "Rogue State” as one which supports terrorism and threatens its neighbors; displays no regard for international law and callously violates international treaties; discards basic human values; maltreats its own people and fritters away national resources for the personal gain of its rulers; is determined to acquire weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), along with other advanced military technology, to be used as threats or offensive designs of its regimes; and hates the United States and everything which it stands for.

This last definition has been apparently put there by the US policy makers in case all else fails to stick. In plain English, as Robert S. Litwak suggests, it means a rogue state is whoever the United States says it is. Litwak speaks from experience. He served on the White House’s National Security Council staff during President Clinton’s first term, as director for non-proliferation and export controls.

Moreover, the meaning of the term “terrorism” has been left to the imagination of all those who want to use it for their own purposes as long as their interpretation does not cross paths with US interests. Despite the apparent ambiguities and dichotomy in the US definition of such a state, for some time now India has been doing everything within its means to get Pakistan declared a rogue state.

Interestingly, when the above definition is applied to this mother of all democracies herself, some awfully remarkable results get thrown up. Let us see how India matches up:

Rogue States support terrorism and threaten their neighbors

All India’s neighbors are ill-at-ease with her. India has a running dispute with each and every one of her neighbors. Be it Pakistan, China, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka or the smaller neighbors. In Pakistan’s case her interventionism has gone to the extreme of mid-wifing the birth of Bangladesh in 1971. It is a documented fact that India has been sponsoring cross-border terrorism in the Pakistani province of Sindh. India’s implicit support for terrorist activity is consistent with its internal behavior. It has a record of repression of minorities that undermines its proclamation of democratic values.

Apart from India’s State terrorism against Sikhs, Christians, Muslims, and all the other minority groups, it is funding terrorism in Bangladesh, Myanmar, and Bhutan. Among insurgencies funded and supported by India, Tamil Eelam of Sri Lanka and Chittagong Hill Tracts in Bangladesh are well known. India created and supported the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), an organization the US government has called a “terrorist” organization. According to Internet journalist Justin Raimondo, the Indian Defense Minister, George Fernandes, raised money and arms for the LTTE. India is also guilty of intervention in the tiny Maldives Islands in broad daylight.

At the same time India has helped the Nepalese state in carrying out a genocidal war against Nepalese people who do not see eye to eye with the Nepalese government on various issues. With the help of Indian advisors the Nepalese state has carried out mass massacres, gang- rapes and inhuman torture on an expanding scale.

On an average more than a dozen people are killed there every day. In the period of last one year, more than 3,500 Nepalese have been killed. In its effort to centralize, concentrate and monopolize state power, the Nepalese monarchy, with the full backing of the so called biggest democracy in the world, has marginalized the parliament and all other institutions and agencies of the state. Nepal has suspended all fundamental human and democratic rights, while killing and arresting progressive journalists and activists. India has collaborated in these fascist genocidal policies by capturing oppositional journalists and deporting them to Nepal. People who came to India seeking medical treatment have been abducted and delivered to the torture chambers of the Nepalese state.

In short, India not only uses terrorism internally but also threatens her neighbors with the export of her experience in the usage of state terrorism.

Rogue States display no regard for international law and callously violate international treaties

The Amnesty International (AI) has repeatedly warned India that it’s anti-terrorism legislation of “Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act” (TADA) and “Prevention of Terrorism Act” (POTA) endanger human rights as these neither provide sufficient safeguards to prevent violations nor are compatible with international treaties. The right to life is laid down in major international human rights treaties, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which India has ratified and in the Indian Constitution.

Article 6(1) of the ICCPR says: “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.” POTA and TADA not only violate rights guaranteed both by the Indian Constitution and international human rights treaties - most prominently the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which India ratified in 1979 - but have verifiably been grossly abused.

A report issued last year by the Movement Against State Repression (MASR) showed that India admitted to holding 52,268 political prisoners. Amnesty International reports that tens of thousands of other minorities are also being held as political prisoners. These prisoners continue to be held under the infamous law (TADA), which expired in 1995. It empowered the government to hold people virtually indefinitely for any offense or for no offense at all.

According to many reports, some of these political prisoners have been in custody for almost two decades. Amnesty International has been reporting for years now that tens of thousands of minorities are being held as political prisoners. More than 40 Members of the US Congress have written to President Bush asking him to work for freedom for these political prisoners. These draconian laws are in contravention of all Canons of Justice. The continued use of these black laws adequately demonstrates that India displays no regard for international law and callously violates international treaties to which she is a party.

Rogue States discard basic human values, maltreat their own people and fritter away their national resources for the personal gain of the rulers

The Indian ruling class is whipping up big-nation bigotry, in total disregard of basic human values, to aggressively push their diehard counter-revolutionary agenda. This has been accompanied by anti-Pakistani war hysteria and unleashing fascist Hindu prejudice. These once hollow slogans have now taken an extreme and dangerous turn. The ruling B.J.P. and their fascist thugs are following the strategy to letter and spirit.

The policy of targeting minorities in general, and Muslims in particular has become routine and institutionalized within the state. The recent state sponsored anti-Muslim pogroms in Gujarat unleashed by the BJP rulers in the state are a case in point. More than 2500 Muslim men, women and children have been massacred for short term gains in national politics. In spite of these confirmed reports, which lay bare the culpability of ruling party men as well as civil and police functionaries in the ghastly killings of innocent men, women, and children of the Muslim community, the Narendra Modi Government not only continues to be in place, but is, ironically, even being acclaimed by the Centre for its handling of the situation. A worse example of using state resources and patronage for the gain of the rulers cannot be found.

According to very credible numbers published by human-rights groups and the Punjab judiciary, the government of India has murdered more than 250,000 Sikhs since 1984, in excess of 200,000 Christians in Nagaland since 1947, almost 75,000 Kashmiri Muslims since 1988, and tens of thousands of Assamese, Tamils, Manipuris, Dalits, and others. In 1994, the US State Department reported that the Indian government paid out over 41,000 cash bounties to police officers for killing members of the Sikh minority.

In the same year, the Indian newspaper Hitavada reported that the Indian government paid the late governor of Punjab, Surendra Nath, the equivalent of $1.5 billion to stir up terrorist activity in Punjab and in Kashmir. Assam, Nagaland, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Jharkhand, Bihar, Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra are some of the places, other than Jammu and Kashmir, where the mother of democracies is busy slaughtering its own children in absolute disregard for basic human values.

The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which leads a 23-party coalition, is a branch of the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS), an organization founded in 1925 in support of the Fascists. The governing ideology of the BJP and all the branches of the RSS is Hindutva i.e. the subjugation of society, politics, and culture to Hinduism. Last year, a cabinet member said that everyone living in India must either be a Hindu or be subservient to Hinduism. And in New York in 2000, Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee said, "I will always be a Swayamsewak."

This is the ideology behind the attacks on Christians, Sikhs, Muslims, and other minorities. The target of choice these days seems to be Muslims and Christians. Human-rights organizations report that more than 200,000 Christians in Nagaland have been killed by the Indian government since partition. These attacks continue a pattern of oppression of Christians that has been going on heavily since Christmas 1998. Since then, members of the RSS have murdered priests, raped nuns, burned churches, and committed other atrocities with impunity.

The RSS published a booklet last year detailing how to file false criminal cases against Christians and other religious minorities. The RSS objects to the presence of missionaries in India. The missionaries are having a good deal of success in converting members of the lower castes, especially Dalits, also known as "Untouchables". This removes the lower-caste people from the stratification of the caste system, which is essential to the Hindu religion and social structure.

During President Clinton's visit to India in March 2000 the Indian secret agencies massacred 35 Sikh villagers in Kashmir and then blamed the Kashmiri freedom fighters for this barbaric act. Movement Against State Repression (MASR) co-sponsored with the Punjab Human Rights Organization an investigation of the March 2000 massacre of 35 Sikhs in Chithisinghpora. It concluded that Indian forces carried out the massacre. A separate investigation conducted by the International Human Rights Organization came to the same conclusion.

Is the aforementioned not sufficient proof that India discards basic human values, maltreats her own people and fritters away her national resources for the gain of the ruling BJP?

Rogue states are determined to acquire weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), along with other advanced military technology, to be used as threats or offensive designs of its regimes

The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction--nuclear, chemical and biological--and the means for their delivery at ever longer ranges has emerged as a central policy objective for the Indian policymakers and planners. India is now a confirmed possessor of all three WMDs. India has one of the more self-sufficient missile programs in the developing world and is expected to become self-sufficient in all areas of production by the beginning of 21st century. It has the capability to design and build a missile with little foreign assistance.

The Rumsfeld Commission Report on Ballistic Missile Threat to USA reported in as far back as 1998; “India is developing a number of ballistic missiles from short range to those with ICBM-class capabilities, along with a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) and a short range, surface ship-launched system. India has the infrastructure to develop and produce these missiles. It is aggressively seeking technology from other states, particularly Russia. While it develops its long range ballistic missiles, India's space-launch vehicles provide an option for an interim ICBM capability. India has detonated several nuclear devices and it is clear that it is developing warheads for its missile systems. India has biological and chemical weapons programs.

Since the Pakistani nuclear tests, India has announced its intention to increase its spending on missiles and nuclear weapons. India's program to develop ballistic missiles began in 1983 and grew out of its space-launch program, which was based on Scout rocket technology acquired from the United States. India currently has developed and deployed the Prithvi short range ballistic missile (SRBM), and is developing longer range, liquid- and solid-fueled missiles.

They include the Prithvi II SRBM, the Agni, Agni-Plus and Agni-B IRBMs, a sea-launched ballistic missile and an SLBM, the Sagarika. India detonated a nuclear device in 1974, conducted a test series in May 1998, and it is clear that it is developing warheads for its missile systems. Indian leaders recently declared that India has developed nuclear weapons for deployment on the Prithvi SRBM and the Agni Plus MRBM. India has acquired and continues to seek Russian, US, and Western European technology for its missile programs. Technology and expertise acquired from other states, particularly from Russia, are helping India to accelerate the development and increase the sophistication of its missile systems.

For example, Russian assistance is critical to the development of the Indian SLBM and its related submarine. But India is rapidly enhancing its own missile science and technology base as well. Many Indian nationals are educated and work in the US, Europe, and other advanced nations; some of the knowledge thereby acquired returns to the Indian missile program. While India continues to benefit from foreign technology and expertise, its programs and industrial base are now sufficiently advanced that supplier control regimes can affect only the rate of acceleration in India's programs. India is in a position to supply material and technical assistance to others.”

With India’s Defense Minister, George Fernandes, openly threatening Pakistan and China with India’s WMDs, the situation is a harbinger of ominous proportions. For a peace loving democracy, India seems to be rather well-armed with WMDs. A more damning testimony of India’s determination to acquire weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), along with other advanced military technology, to be used as threats or offensively to achieve her aggressive designs is hard to be found.

Rogue States hate the United States and everything which it stands for

India has a long record of Anti-Americanism. On May 18, 1999, The Indian Express reported that Mr. Fernandes, the Defense Minister, organized and led a meeting with the Ambassadors from China, Cuba, Russia, Yugoslavia, Libya, and Iraq to discuss setting up a security alliance "to stop the United States."

India votes against the United States at the United Nations more often than any country except Cuba. It had a long term friendship with the former Soviet Union and supported its invasion of Afghanistan, an invasion fought bitterly by United States and its allies to the finish. India remained aligned to the then USSR all this while. India always had, and continues to have, very close relations with Iraq. What else can be called “hating the United States and everything for which it stands for?”

In the one-eyed war on terrorism the west, led by US, has broken all norms of ignoring realities for short term conveniences. From the velvet sheaths of its skilled diplomacy, India has been dealing body blows to the world democracy in the garb of the biggest democracy on planet earth.

India is a country which, despite its claim to be democratic, is killing Christians, Sikhs, Muslims and other minorities. India has been using terrorism against her own minorities for many years now and also exporting terrorism to her neighbors.

Despite intense efforts of the Indian government’s to deceive and mislead, these facts are now increasingly being investigated and commented upon by independent Western journalists, observers and NGOs working for human rights and other humanitarian concerns.

Even if all other clauses of the US definition of a rogue state are ignored, just one clause is enough for the mother of all democracies to qualify as one. A State that fails to protect the lives of its citizens, and rather conspires in their annihilation, is the exact opposite of being an instrument of rightful authority. It is indeed an agent of unashamed criminality. Such a state eminently qualifies to be called a Rogue State. It’s time the powers that be took notice. It’s also time that the true democratic world body asked India that belated, but ultimate, question -- Et Tu India?”

The writer is a freelance contributor, based in UAE

Fantastic article Zakk. Brother, my hat goes off to you for presenting this very astute piece on India. We have heard so much rhetoric from the eastern border, but this puts everything in perspective :k:

this is the type of pseudo analysis pakistanis seem to specialize on. they decide what conclusion they want to arrive at first and then just twist and spin to get there. doesn't matter that facts don't support them. they just make up stuff.

start with an assumption, add a little fabrication, blend in some prevaricatin, flavor it with some lies and garnish it all with simple envy.

whatever proximate event pushed mr.zakk to try this kind of dishonesty, i hope he can get over soon.

Look who’s talking :slight_smile:

Blamed anything on ‘Indian Spanking Institute’ (ISI) recently? :rotfl:

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Jagjeevan: *

start with an assumption, add a little fabrication, blend in some prevaricatin, flavor it with some lies and garnish it all with simple envy.

[/QUOTE]

Oh so tens of thousands of Sikhs were not butchered in the 1980's, and tens of thousands of Christian Naga's have not been killed, and more recently thousands of Muslims were not burned and killed in Gujrat?