Re: GS is in dire need of opening up “THE BACK ROOM” section marked "X-Rated Banter".
It's not *that *bad yaar.. People take advantage of the anonymity veil to discuss these intimate issues online which they perhaps wouldn't discuss with anyone in real life. When stuff is graphic, it will be removed.
I'm also in favour of discussing the "immoral" issues. Fornication, adultery etc can't be brushed under the carpet, can they or should they?
Baki rahi explicit jokes ki baat tau yeah they can take those to MSN/Skype, why should GS accommodate for that?
I am not opposed to discussing real life issues.
But it's the explicit/graphic joking and making light of immorality that gets me.
I don't have a problem with serious-minded discussion.
tanvir sab/sahiba.......aap ne bhi to veena malik k 'assets' pe 2 maheenay guftuGOO ki thi...
Ki thi, gratuitous and public be-hayaaee/nudity ko condemn karne ke liye. :)
Re: GS is in dire need of opening up “THE BACK ROOM” section marked "X-Rated Banter".
CM. I am disappointed.
That line is so tired and here you are being impressed by it.
I was sure that you would be telling me to try a little harder......or suggesting that you expected so much better from me.
Re: GS is in dire need of opening up “THE BACK ROOM” section marked "X-Rated Banter".
Respectfully I would suggest prostitution is a profession. The sleazes factor is not the ladies who are earning an honest living. Sleazy behavior can be amply found with the customers.
IMO - use of pseudo liberal enlightened elite sometimes used by those on the right to smack down folks on the other half. Maybe pseudo conservative can be used instead?
While I did not watch the Veenaji photo I did participate in her defence because I felt pseudo conservatives went overboard in condemning her.