Govt Seeks Foreign Investment For Kalabagh Dam

Private and Public sector - Foreign and Domestic.

SOURCE: Number One News Resource of Pakistan - JANG-GROUP

ISLAMABAD: The new policy for power generation projects formally launched here on Thursday is expected to generate a lot of controversy as the present government has sought foreign investment for the construction of Kalabagh dam with an installed hydel power capacity of 2400 MW along with dozens of other hydel projects all over the country.

However, no formal date for commissioning of the Kalabagh Dam has been given in the policy document distributed during the press conference addressed by secretary water and power, Mirza Hamid Hassan.

The power policy announced by the secretary water and power said the government of Pakistan will guarantee that the terms and conditions of executed agreements are honoured. Power companies will be allowed to import plant and equipment not manufactured locally for hydel and thermal projects including projects based upon renewable resources at concessionary rates.

Companies will also be completely exempted from payment of income tax, including turnover tax, and no tax on imports. However, there will be no exemption from payment of these taxes on oil fired power projects.

To promote indigenisation, the local engineering industry will be encouraged to form joint ventures with foreign companies in order to develop power projects with a cumulative capacity of atleast 2000 MW by the year 2015

Earlier, the Secretary warned that if we do not execute the new power projects earlier, the country will be facing a huge power deficit by 2005. He admitted that though, presently, the country was producing surplus power but that would soon be consumed due to rising demand.

The secretary also spoke about the controversial power policy of Benazir Bhutto government in 1994, saying had that policy not been announced and subsequently executed, even then the country might have been facing huge load shedding today.

But, he said, this policy also resulted in tariff raise due to deals in favour of IPPs. So, he said, the policy carried both positive and negative aspects. He said, now the country is required to undertake many hydel projects to avoid the horrible scenario as after five years, the country will be facing serious power crises.

According to the policy features, reform of power sector through restructuring and deregulation is high on the agenda of the government. The GOP is committed to a far reaching reform programme of the power sector and to help meet country future power needs.

Implementation of the envisaged programme will bring about a gradual transition of the power system from integrated, state owned utilities to a decentralised system with separate generation, transmission and distribution entities, having substantial private ownership and management, reflecting and encouraging , a commercial and competitive operating environment.

The main objectives of the policy are to provide sufficient capacity for power generation, at a least cost, and to avoid, capacity shortfalls; to encourage and ensure exploitation of indigenous resources, which include renewable energy resources, human resources, participation of local engineering and manufacturing capabilities; to ensure that all stakeholders are looked after in the process ie a win -win situation for all and to be attuned to safeguarding the environment. The scope of the policy covers private sector projects, public sector projects, public private partnership and projects developed by the public sector.

On the issue of requirement of future generation capacity, the policy said, presently, the combined generation capacity available in the public and private sector is sufficient to meet the future power demand upto the year 2004-2005. However, it would require augmentation during subsequent years.

Some people just don’t understand!

Report on Kalabagh Dam Clarified

ISLAMABAD: A spokesman of the Ministry of Water and Power has categorically denied a news item published in a section of press on Friday which alleged that the government was pursuing to seek foreign investment for the construction of the Kalabagh dam through recently approved policy for power generation 2002, says a press release.

The spokesman clarified that neither in the policy document nor in the press conference, any special reference was made to the Kalabagh dam. It was simply stated that the new policy lays greater emphasis on hydropower projects to reduce the price of electricity and has provided many incentives to attract private investment in the power sector.

The spokesman said that the power generation policy 2002 has only identified the potential sites for construction of power projects including ideal project as contained in the Vision 2025 approved by the cabinet in January 2001, to seek participation of private, public-private and public sectors.

^Should there be a law in Pakistan for the people publishing fiction or false resports/news?

I think too much press freedom in Pakistan is misused.

Kalabgah has already been rejected by 3 out of 4 provinces. No reason to start this drama all over again.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Imdad Ali: *
Kalabgah has already been rejected by 3 out of 4 provinces. No reason to start this drama all over again.
[/QUOTE]

No drama if Foreign Investment involves.

If the majority of the people of smaller provinces have unanimously decided otherwise and they push ahead with signing an agreement with any foreign investors it is a drama!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Zakk: *
If the majority of the people of smaller provinces have unanimously decided otherwise and they push ahead with signing an agreement with any foreign investors it is a drama!
[/QUOTE]

Care to explain, how would that be, Zakk?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *

No drama if Foreign Investment involves.
[/QUOTE]
Ready to sell the unity of your nation for some dollars?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *

Care to explain, how would that be, Zakk?
[/QUOTE]
It is very easy to underatnd if you know what proportional democracy is about. Majority rules and majority of provinces have already decided except one province which is for it. Even your province has spoken against Kalabagh, but you still support it, why?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Imdad Ali: *
Kalabgah has already been rejected by 3 out of 4 provinces. No reason to start this drama all over again.
[/QUOTE]

Who cares about those 3 provinces...as long as Punjab is happy KB Dam should go ahead...

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Imdad Ali: *
Ready to sell the unity of your nation for some dollars?
[/QUOTE]

Dude,

You have completely lost me.

How could be nation sold out if Foregin investment involves?

Are Pakistanis willing to investment their money in Pakistan? To some extent, yeah but over all NO!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Imdad Ali: *
It is very easy to underatnd if you know what proportional democracy is about. Majority rules and majority of provinces have already decided except one province which is for it. Even your province has spoken against Kalabagh, but you still support it, why?
[/QUOTE]

Democracy? In Pakistan, it is big joke. How could Kalabagh Dam serves only Punjab, not rest of the provinces? Do you have any neutral sources besides Sethi, Shaheen editorials?

Kalabagh should be built and not sometime in the future, but NOW. Pakistan's own survival depends on this dam, since we will not be able to meet the shortages of water in the future. I may sound an extremist in saying that, but those who oppose Kalabagh dam actually are the enemies within, and they have no right to call themselves as Pakistanis, since they only thrive on petty regional diffferences.

Excuse me AK I take offense at that comment, when WAPDA hasn't upheld a single obligation to the people of my area, and to this day hasn't fully compensated the dispalced people of Mangla and Tarbela I think Kalabagh is a bad and nasty joke and an insult to the people of Sarhad, Sindh and Baluchistan and people from other places should show more sensitivity and respect to others opinions...majority doesn't mean authority..if you understand that concept it's called democracy and federalism

PT: I know better then to argue with you, without having links to back up what I am saying;)
http://www.dams.org/kbase/submissions/showsub.php?rec=CAS029

Not only will the Kalabagh Dam inundate 35,000 acres of land at and near the site of construction in North West Frontier Province (NWFP / Pakhtoonkhwa) and Punjab, it will also degrade the soil of Mardan, Pabbi, Swabi plains and the fertile Peshawar Valley and pose serious threat to Nowshera, a city of 200,000 inhabitants. Besides, it will also displace from their hearths and homes 124000 inhabitants, who will have to carry with them the misery and pain of relocation and resettlement. While, it will waterlog large areas of NWFP, it will accelerate desertification and soil infertility in Sindh and Balochistan. Besides being detrimental to Punjab in the long run, the very location of dam in highly active seismic zone poses a persistent threat of sudden floods in the downstream regions of Punjab itself in case of any accident resulting from earthquake.

http://www.dams.org/kbase/submissions/showsub.php?rec=ECO038
Most analysts working on private sector project finance would appear to agree that very few dams will be built without considerable public sector support, and those which do get built in the private sector will tend to be small- to medium-size run-of-river hydro dams. Private funders are loath to take on larger dams with reservoirs because of their increased costs and greater probability of resettlement and environmental problems. Large multipurpose dams like Sardar Sarovar or Aswan, once the pride of the dam industry, have extremely little chance of being built by private investors without major public subsidies because of their huge expense, and because their non-power components such as irrigation would require large subsidies from power revenues and would divert water from being turbined for electricity generation.

Zakk, you are exactly proving my point, that the paltry regional forces such as MQM, ANP, and Jiyaee Sind have mislead the masses for too long, and it’s time that either they should think beyond their petty interests and become a force in dealing with crucial issues such as the power and water shortages, or the federal government should use an iron fist in dealing with them. We have wasted many decades in futile debates, while millions of acres of agricultural land has gone barren in Sind and Punjab due to lack of water storage facilities. Thousands of megawatts will be pumped into the national grid, and it will equally benefit all the provinces and not just Punjab. I reiterate this again, that only those who are opposed to prosperous Pakistan are also against the Kalabagh dam, and they have no place in Pakistan.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Zakk: *
PT: I know better then to argue with you, without having links to back up what I am saying;)
http://www.dams.org/kbase/submissions/showsub.php?rec=CAS029

From your first link:

the social and economic impact of the Kalabagh Dam will be so devastating that it will shatter the very stability of the whole of the South Asia. The proposed project is not in the interest of already marginalized people of the region and it should be discarded forthwith, once and for all.

:rotfl: What the hell was that, Zakk? In conclusion, dam would create instability for the South Asia region. You really believe that, Zakk?

http://www.dams.org/kbase/submissions/showsub.php?rec=ECO038

Most analysts working on private sector project finance would appear to agree that very few dams will be built without considerable public sector support, and those which do get built in the private sector will tend to be small- to medium-size run-of-river hydro dams. Private funders are loath to take on larger dams with reservoirs because of their increased costs and greater probability of resettlement and environmental problems. Large multipurpose dams like Sardar Sarovar or Aswan, once the pride of the dam industry, have extremely little chance of being built by private investors without major public subsidies because of their huge expense, and because their non-power components such as irrigation would require large subsidies from power revenues and would divert water from being turbined for electricity generation.

Did you read the policy of Govt.? Private and Public sector will go together.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Zakk: *
If the majority of the people of smaller provinces have unanimously decided otherwise...
[/QUOTE]

Prove it. When and how have the people of the three small provinces "unanimously" rejected the Kalabagh dam? You have no solid facts to base that on, except for the rantings and ravings of a few nationalist/regionalist parties, who have nothing better to do than spread fasad. What happened to those parties in the election btw? Some like the ANP were wiped out as a political force in the NWFP, the MQM saw its support plummet, while the likes Jiye Sindh did not even register in Sindh, and the Baloch parties lost large sections of their votes in Balochistan.

Malik, just becuase nationalists parties lost a pre-rigged election, doesn't mean anything. Even if the election had been fair, and they lost, it would not mean anything.

Everyone in NWFP, Balochistan and Sindh opposes the Kalabagh dam, no matter if they are members of MQM, PML, or MMA. Or even if they are not members of any party, the average peopl are against the Dam becuase they know it will stop their water. The provincial assemblies already passed bills opposing Kalabagh.

But I know how things work in Pakistan, and Punjab will get its way. So be it, what do we non-Punjabis know what is good for Pakistan anyway. It's not our land, and we are ruled and ordered around by the masters. So, I will just say "Jee hozoor" to Punjabs whims.

Imdad Ali: stop water..????? yes damn right, stop water from flowing into the Arabian ocean and wasted that's all, same water otherwise would be used to irrigate millions of acres of land in Sind and Punjab. What about close to 3000 megawatts of electricity. How do you think punjab will benefit alone from additional power? Please explain.