Re: God is Not Great
I saw sharabee talking about “religious orgy” in this thread (post no. 74). Taking out the “religious” part from it, is this the reason why you are unable to understand the point? lol.
I called it “theory” because that is how many people, especially atheists, refer to it.
But actually it is nothing but an unproven conjecture. This “theory” is the only means by which atheists can hold on to their belief in non-existence of God.
If you call this argument a “lame argument” then you are not worthy of even asking for the evidence of God. It shows how pathetically unaware you are, and what level of intelligence you posses. This argument has all atheist scientists run like chickens. The only thing they could come up with to explain it is their belief in bunch of conjectures which can never be proven.
Here is what I said being discussed here. “Lame argument” my a**: 
Science’s Alternative to an Intelligent Creator: the Multiverse Theory | Cosmology | DISCOVER Magazine
*
it appears that we are not adapted to the universe; the universe is adapted to us.
**
Call it a fluke, a mystery, a miracle. Or call it the biggest problem in physics. Short of invoking a benevolent creator, many physicists see only one possible explanation: Our universe may be but one of perhaps infinitely many universes in an inconceivably vast multi*verse. Most of those universes are barren, but some, like ours, have conditions suitable for life.The idea is controversial.
Critics say it doesn’t even qualify as a scientific theory because the existence of other universes cannot be proved or disproved. Advocates argue that, like it or not, the multiverse may well be the only viable non*religious explanation for what is often called the “fine-tuning problem”—the baffling observation that the laws of the universe seem custom-tailored to favor the emergence of life.
*
I think “philosophy” now needs to read some “science”. 
The above article also says the same thing I just said. The fined-tuned universe (due to universal constants) can only be explained by multiverse theory (or multiverse no-so-much-of-a-theory).
But while fine-tuned universe is an EVIDENCE, multiverse is a mere BELIEF of some scientists.
And now dear philosophy, you shouldn’t be asking for “evidence” of Creator. Because the evidence is there. And the only way you can dispute this evidence is through your BELIEF in his non-existence.