The fellows who indoctrinated these educated youth from Bangalore are the ones who have been training misguided Pakistani youth in UK.
Interesting thing or rather quite unfortunate thing to note was that there was hardly any muslim indian who criticised the acts of these doctors. One can refer print media for the last few weeks. Only one person who voiced his concern was famous journalist Sayeed Naqvi.
What does that silence mean?
It is good that NHS is putting stringent checks for verfying the credentials of docs so that dogs in the guise of docs could be found, framed and punished.
So far as situation in Pakistan is concerned...chickens are coming home to roost...Red Mosque.
Those who row two boats get a vertical split...Mush would have realised by this time.
one nation must be perfectly homogeneous and subject to universal motivations? if not, then the creation of pakistan must be valid?
lol...ravage bhai, let's try to make sense here.
yaar other indian posters are more emotional in their responses, which is what I was going for.
anyway you guys seem to explain away the motivations of Indian Muslim by linking them with Pakistan, when they're peaceful or otherwise getting good press everyones all India is one country.
^ how is it fun? all it did was provide yet another "corraboration" to the idea that muslims are innately violence prone extremists. oh yeah, must be a loads of fun.
Majority of terrorists have muslim names but that doesn't mean all muslims are terrorists. One should avoid stereotyping communities based on the stupid acts of a handful of idiots.
there is a serious point to all this though, the original post disassociated with Indian Muslims and characterized them as close to Pakistanies, something that I suspect would never happen when positive news comes about Indian Muslims.
one or two indian muslims involved in a botched bomb attempt in europe vs. thousands of gujju hindus burning people alive en-masse in india. where should the indian nation's real concerns and priorities for reform be?
yaar other indian posters are more emotional in their responses, which is what I was going for.
anyway you guys seem to explain away the motivations of Indian Muslim by linking them with Pakistan, when they're peaceful or otherwise getting good press everyones all India is one country.
you and i both know that this is not a fair comment.
if an indian muslim is guilty of tax evasion, credit card fraud, domestic abuse, etc....nobody will mention pakistan or de-indianize him.
if an indian muslim is involved in jihadi terrorism or some other crime where the common denominator is his religious affiliation, that is when islam (and potentially pakistan) comes into play and indianness is removed from the playing field. pan-islamist terrorists are not bred in india. in contrast, they are bred with impunity in pakistan. even when indian muslims are involved in this kind of thing, their brainwashing comes from abroad (rendering national background irrelevant), and a direct pakistan link is usually not hard to find. the case in question is no different.
you and i both know that this is not a fair comment.
if an indian muslim is guilty of tax evasion, credit card fraud, domestic abuse, etc....nobody will mention pakistan or de-indianize him.
if an indian muslim is involved in jihadi terrorism or some other crime where the common denominator is his religious affiliation, that is when islam (and potentially pakistan) comes into play and indianness is removed from the playing field. pan-islamist terrorists are not bred in india. in contrast, they are bred with impunity in pakistan. even when indian muslims are involved in this kind of thing, their brainwashing comes from abroad (rendering national background irrelevant), and a direct pakistan link is usually not hard to find. the case in question is no different.
fair enough, sans the potshots at Pakistan and the rather disingenuous comment in light of recent events that pan-Islamist terrorists are not bred in India. But I get the general gist of what youre saying.
