Giving up "Rights" for safety?

[Lajawab]

Re: Giving up “Rights” for safety?

@Ohioguy

MV,

I was reading the research of a Professor who has studied every suicide bombing worldwide in recent history. His research is subtly different. He knows of no circumstance where suicide bombs were used against totalitarian regimes. Suicide bombing has almost always been used against democratic countries, (with Russia being an “emerging democracy”).** He explains this because the bombers believe that democracies are weak, and they are casualty averse.** Thus the goal is to induce pain. Any pain, anywhere, to anyone. Then they attempt to assign the blame to the democracy. Massive death is a cold blooded strategic decision. Extreme suffering works against the Democracy, it is our Achiles heel.

Ruthlessness is also a potent negociating point in the endgame. Who wants to negociate with those with no morals? Unfortunately we know how regimes run by the ruthless eventually turn out.

It’s trusting men like these that has put America where it is today…

Someone ask this guy, did he get into the brain of suicide bombers to believe what they think?

And as for studies like these, they are as bunk as the Feds who conduct them…

Studies like these are a means to distance oneself from other humans and their grievances to justify turning one’s face away from atrocities…An approach used by butchers when slaughtering animals…

Reminds me of a authentic study conducted in Nazi Germany which proved beyond a reason of a of a doubt that Jews were genetically and mentally inferior to Aryans hence prime candidates for extermination…

Ruthlessness is indeed a potent negotiating tool and if taught and approved by a state and ‘experts’ like this, are a means to justify atrocities against racially profiled people…