Girls and Windows Vs Boys and Linux

Girls and Windows ==>

  • Both have a great UI(Looks).
  • Both consume large resources and do less work.
  • Both crash unexpectedly.
  • Both are not easily portable on different architectures(environment)
  • Both can’t work on low resource architectures (environment).
  • Both are costly to maintain.
  • Both give mostly unexpected outputs.
  • Both’s working often contradicts with their documentation
  • Both are easily prone to viruses (rumors and doubts) (and they
    (viruses) do spread very fast in windows based networks).
  • In spite of all above disadvantages, both are liked.

Boys and Linux ==>

  • Both have an average UI.
  • Both are robust.
  • Both are highly secure.
  • Both can be easily modified to support new concepts/features
  • Both are efficient.
  • Both are easily portable to any architecture (environment) no matter
    how low are resources.
  • You can easily guess the output for your input (in Linux just open
    its code, for boys are mostly transparent by nature).
  • Both provide large support for development (work environment).
  • Both are poorly documented.

Re: Girls and Windows Vs Boys and Linux

:k: