Gilchrist leapfrogged his team-mate and captain Ricky Ponting as well as Dhoni thanks to his performances in the three-match series in Bangladesh that finished on Friday. http://www.cricketratings.com/
Yep, Gilli and Dhoni has been discussed many a times, and with Dhoni himself saying that he respects Gilli, that discussion is over..
Dhoni has chance to take over again during WI series. What's the Australian calendar going forward.......
Yep, another challenge for Dhoni, we thought the English bowlers will have him for b/f. He managed that...
lets see how does he manage WI bounce....... Though WI bowling line up does look like fodder as of now.......
^ very likely he will carry his scoring rate for a while as WI bowlers and pitch won’t be more threatening. But still he has been good player so far :k:
Well, both Gilchrist and Dhoni are great players and this tussle is not going to stop until one goes down badly in batting. Anyhow, let's see how Dhoni fares in WI..
Umer
ICC rankings are very inexplicable. What has Gilchrist done consitently past this year to regain number one spot? Oh yeah his breathtaking start in secone one dayer against Bangladesh. Totally forgot about that
This is not fair statment Saby. Gilli has been very consistant in ODIs for last few months now. You are confusing his OID performance with his test performance. Runs against Bangladesh helped only a little bit since there was close gap between him,dhoni and ponting. And now he is just barely ahead of Dhoni. Here is his score in last 15 inning
34 1 caught 2 *+ W VB Series 7 v SL in Aus 2005/06 at Adelaide (d/n) [2319](http://stats.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/OD_TOURNEYS/VBS/SCORECARDS/AUS_SL_VBS_ODI7_26JAN2006.html)]
116 1 caught 2 *+ W VB Series 8 v SL in Aus 2005/06 at Perth (d/n) [2320](http://stats.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/OD_TOURNEYS/VBS/SCORECARDS/AUS_SL_VBS_ODI8_29JAN2006.html)]
33 1 bowled 1 + W VB Series 10 v SA in Aus 2005/06 at Melbourne (DS) (d/n) [2322](http://stats.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/OD_TOURNEYS/VBS/SCORECARDS/AUS_RSA_VBS_ODI10_03FEB2006.html)]
88 1 caught wk 1 + W VB Series 11 v SA in Aus 2005/06 at Sydney (d/n) [2323](http://stats.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/OD_TOURNEYS/VBS/SCORECARDS/AUS_RSA_VBS_ODI11_05FEB2006.html)]
26 1 caught 2 + L VB Series F1 v SL in Aus 2005/06 at Adelaide (d/n) [2326](http://stats.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/OD_TOURNEYS/VBS/SCORECARDS/AUS_SL_VBS_ODI-FINAL1_10FEB2006.html)]
0 1 caught 1 + W VB Series F2 v SL in Aus 2005/06 at Sydney (d/n) [2328](http://stats.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/OD_TOURNEYS/VBS/SCORECARDS/AUS_SL_VBS_ODI-FINAL2_12FEB2006.html)]
122 1 bowled 2 + W VB Series F3 v SL in Aus 2005/06 at Brisbane (d/n) [2330](http://stats.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/OD_TOURNEYS/VBS/SCORECARDS/AUS_SL_VBS_ODI-FINAL3_14FEB2006.html)]
14 1 caught 1 *+ L 1st ODI v SA in SA 2005/06 at Centurion [2341](http://stats.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/AUS_IN_RSA/SCORECARDS/AUS_RSA_ODI1_26FEB2006.html)]
1 1 caught wk 2 *+ L 2nd ODI v SA in SA 2005/06 at Cape Town (d/n) [2345](http://stats.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/AUS_IN_RSA/SCORECARDS/AUS_RSA_ODI2_03MAR2006.html)]
25 1 caught wk 1 + W 3rd ODI v SA in SA 2005/06 at Port Elizabeth [2347](http://stats.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/AUS_IN_RSA/SCORECARDS/AUS_RSA_ODI3_05MAR2006.html)]
45 1 caught 2 + W 4th ODI v SA in SA 2005/06 at Durban (d/n) [2348](http://stats.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/AUS_IN_RSA/SCORECARDS/AUS_RSA_ODI4_10MAR2006.html)]
55 1 caught 1 + L 5th ODI v SA in SA 2005/06 at Johannesburg [2349](http://stats.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/AUS_IN_RSA/SCORECARDS/AUS_RSA_ODI5_12MAR2006.html)]
76 1 lbw 2 + W 1st ODI v BD in BD 2005/06 at Chittagong (CDS) [2365](http://stats.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/AUS_IN_BDESH/SCORECARDS/AUS_BDESH_ODI1_23APR2006.html)]
32 1 lbw 1 + W 2nd ODI v BD in BD 2005/06 at Fatullah [2366](http://stats.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2005-06/AUS_IN_BDESH/SCORECARDS/AUS_BDESH_ODI2_26APR2006.html)]
^well I guess you are right. His record is okay-ish but number one spot is still questionable. Three fifties and two centuries. Fair enough! but I guess I was too used to his higher hit ratio.