Ghurids were Pashtuns

Ghauris were Pashtuns, atleast linguistically and culturally, they might have been different people before pashtunization. There is wikipedia war going on between Tajiks/iranis and Pashtuns, the info about ghauris there is incorrect.
Ghauris were different from persians and turks. They were tribal people of ghoristan mountains, divided into numerous tribes.
*Among the numerous Ghorid chiefs, the ****Shansabani tribe ****had the most authority over all the other Ghorid tribes "*As Persians had no tribal culture, the Shansabani were a tribe and the Ghauris were structured as a tribal society. Therefore ghauris could not be Tajiks and Persians .
If you look at the Geneology of the Shansabani Tribe; you notice that the Patriarch of the Shansabani rulers possesses the name “Suri”. e.g Sayf ud-Din Suri (1146-1149 ). Mohammad ibn suri, who was ancestor of shahabudin ghauri.

Baihaqi who is considered as the most famous historian of the Ghaznavid era had written in page 117 that "Sultan Massud leaves for (jaroos ghoor) “jai darmeshi paat”… and sends his learned companion with two people from Ghor as interpreter between this person and the people of that region.

Now why is there a need for an interpreter between this learned companion who already spoke Farsi and turkic and the people of the Ghor region ? That clearly indicates that the region was not speaking Farsi or turkic speaking.
There are also other numerous accounts such as the accounts of Minhaaj Saraj from that era and others who gives similar accounts.

Now come to the most important proof. Amir karor suri, malak ya gharsheen and
asad suri were famous pashto poets from ghor/ghoristan region before times of mongol invasion.

Ghor itself is a pashto word which means mountain.

The Suri tribe of the Afghans inhabited the mountains of Ghor east of Furrah and their principal cities were Ghore, Feruzi and Bamian (Gazetteer of the world or dictionary of geographical knowledge. Vol 5. London: A Fullerton and Company. p. 61.)

Also Note that original abode of numerous pashtun tribes was ghor e.g Niazis, mohmands, lodhis, suris etc. Mongol invasion annihilated ghor, forcing remnants of ghorid tribes to move eastward.

Amir Ibn-i Suri
Amir Suri was a non-Muslim king in the region of Ghor from an ancient dynasty and he was defeated by Mahmud of Ghazni. According to Minhaju-S Siraj, Amir Suri was captured by Mahmud of Ghazni, made prisoner along with his son and taken to Ghazni, where Amir Suri died by poisoning himself.
It was also the last stronghold of an ancient religion professed by the inhabitants when all their neighbors had become Muslim. In the 11th century AD Mahmud of Ghazni defeated the prince of Ghor Ibn –I-Suri, and made him prisoner in a severely-contested engagement in the valley of Ahingaran. Ibn-I-Suri is called a Hindu by the author, who has recorded his overthrow; it does not follow that he was one by religion or by race, but merely that he was not Muhammadan
(The Kingdom of Afghanistan: a historical sketch By George Passman Tate Edition: illustrated Published by Asian Educational Services, 2001 Page 12)

According to recorded Afghan tradition, Surs are descended from the Ghori tribe. Several books by Islamic historians including Tarikh-I-Guzida of Hamdu-lla-Mustaufi, Towareekh Yumny, as well as Ferishta record that besides Muslim Surs there were also Non-Muslim Hindu and Buddhist Surs, who were attacked by Mahmud of Ghazni and converted to Islam by him.

Sultan Mahumud now went to fight with the Ghorians , who were infidels at that time. Suri, their chief, was killed in this war, and his son was taken prisoner; but he killed himself by sucking poison which he had kept under the stone of his ring. The country of Ghor was annexed to that of the Sultan, and the population thereof converted to Islam. He now attacked the fort of Bhim, where was a temple of the Hindus
(Tarikh -I-Guzida of Hamdu-lla-Mustaufi. Page 65 from The History of India told by its own Historians H M Eliot and Dowson Volume 3)

'In the following year AH 401 (AD 1010), Mahmood led his army towards Ghoor . The native prince of the country, Mahomed, of the Afghan tribe of Soor (the same race which gave birth to the dynasty that eventually succeeded in subverting the family of Sebüktigin), occupied an entrinched camp with 10,000 men. Mahmood was repulsed in repeated assaults which he made from morning till noon. Finding that the troops of Ghoor defended their entrenchments with such obstinacy, he caused his army to retreat in apparent confusion, in order to allure the enemy out of his fortified position. The Ghoorians, deceived by the stratagem, pursued the army of Ghizny; when the king, facing about, attacked and defeated them with great slaughter. Mahommed Soor, being made prisoner was brought to the king, but having taken poison, which he always kept under his ring, he died in a few hours; his country was annexed to the dominions of Ghizny. The author of the Towareekh Yumny affirms, that neither the sovereigns of Ghoor nor its inhabitants were Mahomedans till after this victory; whilst the author of the Tubkat-Nasiry, and Fukhr-ood-Deen Moobarik Shah Lody, the latter of whom wrote a history of the Kings of Ghoor in verse, both affirm, that they were converted many years before, even so early as the time of Ally
(Ferishta-Translation John Briggs, p. 28 vol 1)

Shah Hussain was descended from the younger branch of the Ghorian race, while Muhammad-i-Suri, said to be the great-great-grandfather of the Sultans Ghiyas-ud-Din and Muizz-ud-Din (Muhammad of ghor) was descended from the elder branch, with whom sovereignty lay. Shah Hussain by one of his Afghan wives, had three sons, Ghalzi, Ibrahim surnamed Lodi, and Sarwani. The Afghan tribe of Sur was founded by Sur, son of Ismail, grandson of Lodi** (“Glossary of the Tribes and Castes of the Punjab and North West Frontier Province” H.A. Rose, Ibetson 1990, P210)**

*Mahuy Suri
Mahuy Suri was the Sasanian governor of **Merv **in Khorasan during the reign of Yazdegerd iii.*(The Shah-Namah of Fardusi translation by Alexander Rogers LPP Publication Page 547)

*Muhammad ibn Suri
First king of ghorid dyansty.

It is said that Muhammad was a great king and most of the territories of Ghor were in his possession. But as many of the inhabitants of Ghor of High and low degree had not yet embraced Islam, there was constant strife among them. The Saffarids came from Nimruz to Bust and Dawar, Ya’qub al-Saffar overpowered Lak-Lak, who was the chief of Takinabad, in the country of Rukhaj. The Ghorians sought the safety in Sara-sang and dwelt there in security but even among them hostilities constantly prevailed between the Muslims and the infidels. One castle was at war with another castle, and their feuds were unceasing; but owing to the inaccessibility of the mountains of Rasiat, which are in Ghor no foreigner was able to overcome them, and Muhammad was the head of all the Mandeshis.*(The History of India as told by its own Historians by Eliot and Dowson, Volume 2 page 284)

Ghurids didnt speak farsi or Turkic
*Ghor itself was a country of infidels, containing only a few Musulmans, and the inhabitants spoke a language different from that of Khurasan *(The History of India as told by its own Historians by Eliot and Dowson, Volume 2 page 576)
Amir Kror Suri
Famous Pashto poet and governor of mandesh (ghor).

http://www.khyber.org/images/maps/ghaurid-empire-1149-1212.png


Restored attachments:

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

Nothing can be said for certain, but majority of historians believe that Ghaurids were Tajiks. Over 90% of inhabitants of Ghor are Hazaras today.

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

^You didnt read the article, for God sake stop taking wikipedia as reliable facts. Give me the names of those historians who say that ghorian were tajiks, other than iranicencyclopedia. Demographics of ghor is different today because its original population was wiped out by mongols. I have already proved in the article why ghorids were not tajiks or turkics, i dont need to repeat myself. Do you even know who tajiks are? They were persians who migrated from iran during islamic expansion and assimilated into bactarians and sogdians, who were eastren iranic like pakhtuns.

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

What if they were Pashtuns and what if they were not? Will that change the history and their actions?

Salute to those who are involved in wikipedia wars on these issues :salute:

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

What is the origin of Pashtuns? Were they of Persian origin initially? What was their original religion- was it Avestan or Buddhism? Paktas (pastuns) are only one of the few border tribes mentioned in hindu scriputres. The others are Bhalanases, Vishanins, Alinas, and Sivas. They all inhabited the region between Peshawar and Kubha (Kabul). That region has seen a lot of invasions and settlements that it is difficult to claim that some ancient people belonged to a particular ancestry. Many parts of present day Tajikistan belonged to the Kamboja empire and were majority Buddhist. Even its neighbor - present day Uzbekistan was mostly Zoroastrian but had a sizable buddhist minority. Up until the arrival of Islam, the invaders and settlers accepted the religion and culture of the people ex:Kanishka and Mihirakula. So there would have been a great deal of mixing of populations.

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

what was the lingua franca of their court?

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

Just because they spoke “a language different from that of Khurasan”, it does not imply automatically that they did not speak Persian or Turkish.
Persian was an evolving language that time, from Middle Persian to New Persian. There must have been differences in dialects in different regions, especially in a region like Ghur which was religiously different from its neighbors.

Ghurids are known to have originated from the family whose name is said to have derived from Middle Persian.

From Encyclopedia Iranica:
Ghaurid Dynasty
The Ghurids came from the Sansabani family. The name of the eponym Sansab probably derives from the Middle Persian name Wisnasp (Justi, Namenbuch, p. 282).

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

well if you ask the iranians, everyone important was iranian from god to hitler.

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

:rotfl:

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

Ghurids are mostly referred as Tajiks, not Iranians.

The name of the author does not suggest that he is an Iranian.
Edmund Bosworth
Encyclopaedia Iranica

I am curious who are some important people wrongly attributed as Iranian. Any examples?
BTW, people like compiler of Sahih Bukhari, Imam Abu Hanifa, Abu Dawood, Ibn Sena, Ibn Hesam, Khwarzimi, Tusi, al-Biruni; really were Persian/Tajik.


But this self-exaltation is found among many people. For example, some Indians continue to believe in that preposterous 'Out of India' theory. And some Pashtuns continue to think of themselves as lost tribe of Israelites.

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

khoji, you can add the tribe of the quresh to your list. quresh is just a form of koresh aka cyrus. persians everywhere.

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

Ghurid dynasty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the 19th century, some European scholars, such as Mountstuart Elphinstone, favoured the idea that the Ghurid dynasty relate to today’s Pashtun people,[SUP][9]](Ghurid dynasty - Wikipedia)[/SUP][SUP][10]](Ghurid dynasty - Wikipedia)[/SUP][SUP][11]](Ghurid dynasty - Wikipedia)[/SUP] but this is generally rejected by modern scholarship, and, as explained by Morgenstierne in the Encyclopaedia of Islam, is for “various reasons very improbable”.[SUP][12]](Ghurid dynasty - Wikipedia)[/SUP] Instead, the consensus in modern scholarship (incl. Morgenstierne, Bosworth, Dupree, Gibb, Ghirshman, Longworth Dames and others) holds that the dynasty was most likely of Tajik origin.[SUP][13]](Ghurid dynasty - Wikipedia)[/SUP][SUP][14]](Ghurid dynasty - Wikipedia)[/SUP][SUP][15]](Ghurid dynasty - Wikipedia)[/SUP] Bosworth further points out that the actual name of the Ghurid family, Āl-e Šansab (Persianized: Šansabānī), is the Arabic pronunciation of the originally Middle Persian name Wišnasp, hinting at a (Sasanian) Persian origin.[SUP][16]](Ghurid dynasty - Wikipedia)[/SUP]

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

No. Quresh were originally Hindu people from Saraswati plains. Pandit Goswami says that the word Quresh derives from the Indian word 'Kursi'. Because Quresh had become leaders after coming to Arabia.
(yuck yuck yuck yuck).

Now your turn. :)

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

funny. because that isn't much of a ridiculous claim. it is something even many arabs attest to as the origins of the quresh. why so defensive pal. :)

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

lol.
Why would I be defensive? I am just laughing along with a friend who just amused me. :)
So take it lightly, pal.

What is known among Arabs is that Prophet of Islam was from Quresh, and also the direct descendant of Prophet Ibrahim.

But we know that it is obviously wrong. As per the 'Out of India' theory.

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

pal.. the out of india theory is bs. it is more an out of indus valley theory but bs none the less. and abraham was mesopotamian.

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

haha. :k:
So you don’t believe Abraham is derived from the word ‘Brahmen’?!
And that the concept of Trinity is derived from ‘Trimurti’?!

Man, don’t be sacrilegious. no no. Do you want to be bhrasht?

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

the thing about belief is even if you dont believe Abraham is Brahman, it is true.

jk jk

i dont think anyone but some nutjobs believe in such stuff.

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

This belief is most certainly not widespread, at least not in my experience. If anything, it is a negligible minority who hold this belief. If you even suggest to most Pashtun people that they may have Semitic (read: Jewish) origins, they will respond rather defensively and that's phrasing it nicely. A couple of years ago, a gentleman produced a documentary examining this theory, and he received death threats while doing research for his film back home on account of the fact that many people viewed the subject of his film as "defamation" and "spreading lies."

Re: Ghurids were Pashtuns

Don't take it seriously. LOL.

Some Racists use that against Pashtoons, and sometimes say that this is what pashtoons believe themselves; which the said racists actually believe themselves.