Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

Society Religion & Philosophy
41

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

not all of it, as he had a knack for writing rubbish, but I have read enough of his work and enough from others about the issues in maddoodis work that I am aghast at how ppl can respect that character.

There is enough written about the transgressions of this fool by many ulema. I dont have to repeat that stuff, all is available oline

42

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

Yes and he was also not a scholar, but he was self studied Mullah and his attacks on Prophets, Sahabas, etc are well known. He used to work in an office in Jamia e Hind and many times he stole the works of others like of Shaikh Hussain Ahmed Madani r.h. Then he started his own so called Jamat e Islami and at first many of the great scholars joined him such as Shaikh Abul Hassan Ali al-Nadwi r.h, Allamah Manzoor Ahmed Naumani r.h. Later on all these personalites left his jamat and wrote books against him.

43

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

^ maudoudi spoke the truth about the great fitna ...may Allah be pleased with him.
Ghamidi is like the son of abu musa ashari, who can be bought by any corrupt regime to promote their version of Islam ...in this case "enlightened moderation" where dance, music and all social evils are legitimate
but rising against a corrupt ruler is illegitimate

44

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

Maududi was himself a fitna.

45

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

havent read the entire article yet, but lol anything that comes in with the package of dr liaquat is bad news. its a litmus test proven right many times :o

46

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

hmm so i havent got enough knowledge to judge the entire read but if a person, supposedly a scholar, wrongly translates the word ahad into alag then its speaking volumes about his scholarhood.

47

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

Ghamdi is wrong, Moudoodi is fitna, hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm interesting... then Dr.Israar might be a fitna as well, as many of this understanding is inspired by Moudoodi... so let see who is left.. Dr. Tahir.ul.qadri is the right guy? am i right khanbabax???

48

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

No need to argue boys, a good rule of thumb to follow is that all mullahs are a fitna.

49

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

^and imran khan too?

50

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

Dr. Tahir ul Qadri is a professor and not a tradional scholar. None on the above personalites are tradional scholars. From all of the above, Dr. Israar sounds more reasonable as he also has great respect for the scholar.

51

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

This is rich coming form the guy that claims Quran can be superceded by Hadees!

52

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

Khanbabax you didnt answer my question about which languages the Prophet and the sahaba translated the Quran into, as you claimed here.

[quote]

Ghamdis translation is against the translation of Prophet s.a.w and Sahabas and Mufassireen. This is not a game that anyone can translate Quran for their personal whims and desires and Zindeeq Ghamdi have done.

[/quote]

53

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

Maudoodi a fitna surprising, well some proofs would be great to do with. Not like i support maudoodi but have read some of his stuff and he is quite reasonable, agreed he was agressive.

54

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

^ just google it, search under fitna and maududi and then read. if you disagree you arefree to contact the groups and scholars who have blasted the hack.

I want female friends from Lahore
55

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

I do not listen what Ghamdi is saying. whenever he comes on TV.
i switch to "Star Movies" channel bcz he is trying to confuse me with his Satanic interpretaion of Quran and Hadis and i cannot be confused by this, neverever.

I want female friends from Lahore
56

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

I have to agree with khanbaba, Ghamidi is not a scholar and it is a disprespect to scholars if anyone calls him one.

57

Re: Ghamidi’s Attack on Islam

Here are 2 audio lectures on Maududi-ism.
http://www.islamibayanaat.com/MuftiSaeedAhmadPalanpuri.htm

And an article by Allamah Yusuf Ludhanvi Shaheed

and this one by Allamah Yusuf Binori
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=208222&postcount=16

58

Re: Ghamidi’s Attack on Islam

Ravage others have already answered on my behalf but also read here http://www.paklinks.com/gsmedia/files/laeeqkhan/gham003.gif and how in what context this word Gusaa was used by Prophet s.a.w and how Ghamdi used it.

59

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

Khanbabax others have answered varyingly that you meant translation and that you didnt mean translation.

Clearly it is incorrect to say that the Prophet or Sahaba "translated" anything at all, since that involves another language, and also implies a broader conflict than the examples quoted which revolve around a few words. One can only say that Ghamdi's translation conflicts with the meaning of certain words as explained by the Prophet according to ahadis.

60

Re: Ghamidi's Attack on Islam

No, it doesn't have to be in another language. Here are the meanings of word 'translate' from dictionary.com. And keep this in mind if you change only one word in an ayah it can change the whole concept of the ayah. You are arguing without hikmah about a tiny bit.

1.to turn from one language into another or from a foreign language into one's own: *to translate Spanish. *
2.to change the form, condition, nature, etc., of; transform; convert: *to translate wishes into deeds. *

*3.to explain in terms that can be more easily understood; interpret. *