GEO TV License is Disproved.

[Amal]

Re: GEO TV License is Disproved.

Somebody told me that "you cannot think beyond IK", whereas the fact is that anti-PTI people cannot live without bashing PTI for one reason or the other. No sooner did the Pemra announce its decision yesterday, some of my very dear friends attributed the Pemra decision to Imran Khan the very next moment. Can anyone please justify this attribution? Does Pemra fall under Imran Khan?

Imran Khan condemned Geo's transmission against ISI. Someone please name a single person, leader or entity who did not condemn Geo for the same. Imran did not boycott Geo for its transmission against ISI, he had other grievances against the policy of the group. PTI leaders, including Imran, have sad it many times that they are not against Geo as an organisation, but they are against the policy of the businessman who runs it. Everything is on record for anyone who is not blind by his bias. Imran does not have the right to boycott a channel for his personal or party's sake? Must he watch Geo to prove his democratic and leadership credentials? Did the so-called liberals and democrats on this forum bother to note the smear campaign by Geo bigwigs against IK on twitter? Imran's mistake is that he spoke against Geo because he is no Zardari who will keep mum because he had innumerable skeletons in his cupboard. The lovers of status-quo hated to see a political leader questioning the supra-god of media.

*Are peaceful demonstrations against democratic norms? *

Is protesting against election rigging illegal?

Is demanding electoral reforms against the constitution?

[SID_NY]

Re: GEO TV License is Disproved.

SID_NY, I knew he'd take the take cake.

hahaha.. You continue to meet the expectations my friend which ofcourse in this case are far low. Please go ahead and continue throwing judgements and finger pointing instead of trying understand others' arguments and deal with it like a mature.

Jeez, i'm so glad its only online , you might have ripped me apart physically otherwise as you just havent even considered my arguments at all and continued throwing punches.

Thats ok. Its really hard to meet any PTI fan who cares about sensible arguments. :)

[queer]

Re: GEO TV License is Disproved.

everyone's an anwar pasha uncle on PA. just takes the right prodding to bring it out..

[mahool]

Re: GEO TV License is Disproved.

@muqawwee123

Three A’s run Pakistan. Allah, America… the third we all know

@Khalil KhaaN FaaKhta

PEMRA vs GEO, i wonder this will NOT turn out to be:

Zaka Ashraf VS Najam SeThii

is it:

PEMRA vs GEO = Najam SeThii vs Zaka Ashraf?

bongian kion mar rahay ho…

[Jolie]

Re: GEO TV License is Disproved.

IK is an agitator & not a leader and agitators getting attention shouldn't be surprising (like a circus clown). And the reason we keep talking about him is b/c of his agitation/hypocrisy. He was appalled that GEO went after ISI (ISI is a mafia wing of the military) but had no courage to condemn beheading of Pakistani troops by his jiahid friends. His party is ruling the province & when teenager stops homicidal terrorists from killing everyone in school...PTI failed to recognized a national hero, but IK shut down entire country when mass murderer scumbag was taken out by drone.

Oh dear...lol

You can be an agitator once, and you can be an agitator twice, but if you are consistently working the national crowd for two decades then you are definitely more than an agitator - you are a leader. And of course one man's leader is other person's parade pisser, and even I'd agree with you that no one knows how to piss on people's parade better than Imran.

You can sit here and wish as a self soothing exercise that Imran is nothing less than a circus clown who's getting bit of attention here and there and everyone's just having a good laugh, while it is translucently visible likes of you are actually deeply hurt and frightened of his new found role as a Kingmaker. :)

Yes, that's right. He's a Kingmaker whose every word dominates Pakistan's politics for days and days and many days like no one's business. People who vehemently malign him are the ones majorly contribute towards his popularity. They are the ones who make sure Imran's receives absolutely maximum publicity. It's common sense, if you going to talk about him for days and days and talk about nothing but him, chances are his views will leave a deep impression on people's psyche. They'll get institutionalised. His ideas will become the only way.

I mean you should know better, people like you have done this to his peace talks doctrine. Likes of you obsessively discussed it too the teeth, hoping that it'll become unpopular, people will forget about his ideas despite the irony that his statements infinitely dominating the press and all types of media. But look what happened - his idea became the ultimate policy of the same people who initially ridiculed and rejected him . You know why, because people spent far more time opposing Imran than promoting the alternatives! At the end of the day, there was no alternative but Imran's objectives.

His ability to capture people's imagination (haters or supporters), seize the crowd on every juncture and direct people's energies, define their collective focus - something you strangely find very embarrassing - are the traits history will remember as his most shining qualities. We all know that very well that history tends to be very kind to leaders who are people's personalities. Winston Churchill instantly comes to mind.

Pretty painfully anti climax situation you have right now, isn't it? The man who was a viciously portrayed as Taliban Khan by his haters as a bait for army to only to have them feel offended but to ultimately have them wipe his name off from the political scene as punishment. However, now the same man is conveniently assumed as a military darling? LOL. Do you see the stupidity and desperation that reeks through such propaganda? Even your post is contradicting Imran's position as a military darling. Why would military bother save his ship if - according to you- didn't even had the courage to condemn (only Lord knows what this word really means in your dictionary) beheading of Pakistan soldiers?

But one thing is positively clear, this whole episode has effectively exposed fairweather military supporters who not so long ago were the most vociferous army/ISI cheerleaders. The same army and ISI that's expected to defeat Taliban are now considered filthy bunch of uniformed mafia, treacherous villains and public number in the eyes of NRPs.

I had said it long time ago in this same forum, that Pakistan military would never commit to costly within border full blown out insurgency because they know the very warmongers who are pushing for a bloody war will leave no opportunity to turn the public tide against the military. You simply don't commit to civil wars when you have no genuine support amongst the public.

[devilish_angel]

Re: GEO TV License is Disproved.

Somebody told me that "you cannot think beyond IK", whereas the fact is that anti-PTI people cannot live without bashing PTI for one reason or the other. No sooner did the Pemra announce its decision yesterday, some of my very dear friends attributed the Pemra decision to Imran Khan the very next moment. Can anyone please justify this attribution? Does Pemra fall under Imran Khan?

Imran Khan condemned Geo's transmission against ISI. Someone please name a single person, leader or entity who did not condemn Geo for the same. Imran did not boycott Geo for its transmission against ISI, he had other grievances against the policy of the group. PTI leaders, including Imran, have sad it many times that they are not against Geo as an organisation, but they are against the policy of the businessman who runs it. Everything is on record for anyone who is not blind by his bias. Imran does not have the right to boycott a channel for his personal or party's sake? Must he watch Geo to prove his democratic and leadership credentials? Did the so-called liberals and democrats on this forum bother to note the smear campaign by Geo bigwigs against IK on twitter? Imran's mistake is that he spoke against Geo because he is no Zardari who will keep mum because he had innumerable skeletons in his cupboard. The lovers of status-quo hated to see a political leader questioning the supra-god of media.

*Are peaceful demonstrations against democratic norms? *

Is protesting against election rigging illegal?

Is demanding electoral reforms against the constitution?

I was listening to shahid masood today n he said for all those who are saying k IK ne ab geo k khilaf position le ha tu mei ALLAH ko hazir nazir jan kr kehta hun k when I meet him in hospital soon after elections he said the same k media group rigged the elections and even named the anchors.

but now Imran has become more rigid and aggressive.

[KKF]

Re: GEO TV License is Disproved.

@mahool

bongian kion mar rahay ho…

GS ‘Bongi aDDa’ hai to maiN BongiyaaN kia Haiwaan-e-sadar meN maaruuNgaa?

[Shamraz_Khan]

Re: GEO TV License is Disproved.

Oh dear...lol

You can be an agitator once, and you can be an agitator twice, but if you are consistently working the national crowd for two decades then you are definitely more than an agitator - you are a leader. And of course one man's leader is other person's parade pisser, and even I'd agree with you that no one knows how to piss on people's parade better than Imran.

You can sit here and wish as a self soothing exercise that Imran is nothing less than a circus clown who's getting bit of attention here and there and everyone's just having a good laugh, while it is translucently visible likes of you are actually deeply hurt and frightened of his new found role as a Kingmaker. :)

Yes, that's right. He's a Kingmaker whose every word dominates Pakistan's politics for days and days and many days like no one's business. People who vehemently malign him are the ones majorly contribute towards his popularity. They are the ones who make sure Imran's receives absolutely maximum publicity. It's common sense, if you going to talk about him for days and days and talk about nothing but him, chances are his views will leave a deep impression on people's psyche. They'll get institutionalised. His ideas will become the only way.

I mean you should know better, people like you have done this to his peace talks doctrine. Likes of you obsessively discussed it too the teeth, hoping that it'll become unpopular, people will forget about his ideas despite the irony that his statements infinitely dominating the press and all types of media. But look what happened - his idea became the ultimate policy of the same people who initially ridiculed and rejected him . You know why, because people spent far more time opposing Imran than promoting the alternatives! At the end of the day, there was no alternative but Imran's objectives.

His ability to capture people's imagination (haters or supporters), seize the crowd on every juncture and direct people's energies, define their collective focus - something you strangely find very embarrassing - are the traits history will remember as his most shining qualities. We all know that very well that history tends to be very kind to leaders who are people's personalities. Winston Churchill instantly comes to mind.

Pretty painfully anti climax situation you have right now, isn't it? The man who was a viciously portrayed as Taliban Khan by his haters as a bait for army to only to have them feel offended but to ultimately have them wipe his name off from the political scene as punishment. However, now the same man is conveniently assumed as a military darling? LOL. Do you see the stupidity and desperation that reeks through such propaganda? Even your post is contradicting Imran's position as a military darling. Why would military bother save his ship if - according to you- didn't even had the courage to condemn (only Lord knows what this word really means in your dictionary) beheading of Pakistan soldiers?

But one thing is positively clear, this whole episode has effectively exposed fairweather military supporters who not so long ago were the most vociferous army/ISI cheerleaders. The same army and ISI that's expected to defeat Taliban are now considered filthy bunch of uniformed mafia, treacherous villains and public number in the eyes of NRPs.

I had said it long time ago in this same forum, that Pakistan military would never commit to costly within border full blown out insurgency because they know the very warmongers who are pushing for a bloody war will leave no opportunity to turn the public tide against the military. You simply don't commit to civil wars when you have no genuine support amongst the public.

I like your post, not for its content, but for your passionate takhreer/speech b/c rhetoric is no substitute for substance. You should hurry back to Pakistan & polish up your Urdu (I have a terrible accent in Urdu :( ) to help PTI. :D I'm sure they can use your help. On side note, comparing IK to Churchill? Churchill defend his Island and Europe from Nazis and IK wants to hand over much of NW to Taliban.

[Jolie]

Re: GEO TV License is Disproved.

@Shamraz_Khan

I like your post, not for its content, but for your passionate takhreer/speech b/c rhetoric is no substitute for substance. You should hurry back to Pakistan & polish up your Urdu (I have a terrible accent in Urdu ) to help PTI. I’m sure they can use your help. On side note, comparing IK to Churchill? **Churchill defend his Island and Europe from Nazis **and IK wants to hand over much of NW to Taliban.

That’s probably what Wikipedia says, innit?

As with your first part of the sentence, inshAllah, why not. And thank you for seeing the substance and content as well…