Ganguly's appeal rejected

The slow over-rate controversy
Ganguly’s appeal rejected
Cricinfo staff
April 18, 2005

Sourav Ganguly’s appeal against the six-match ban for slow over-rates has been rejected by Michael Beloff QC, the ICC appeals commissioner. In a 23-page judgement, Beloff agreed with the decision taken by Chris Broad, the match referee. However, there was a minor consolation for Ganguly when the ICC later announced that the two matches he had missed would be part of the six-match ban, so that Ganguly would be out for a further four one-day internationals.

In his judgement, Beloff said: “The appellant was notified that India bowled with no energy; and he was, as captain, clearly being held responsible for that underperformance which itself was said to be the cause of the failure to achieve the minimum over-rate.”

In the appeal, Ganguly had stated that the extreme heat was the reason for lapse, but Beloff dismissed the argument. “Cricket is a game played in all kinds of climates; it cannot be right that the mere fact of the heat and humidity will excuse a failure to achieve the minimum over-rate.”

He also explained why he had asked for a written submission from Ganguly, instead of an oral hearing. “While I acknowledge without reservation the need to observe the rules of natural justice, it must be recalled that natural justice does not automatically require an oral hearing,” he said. “What is essential is that the appellant is made aware of the case against him and that he has a fair opportunity to make his own case, which, in all the circumstances I consider that he had.”

Later, Malcolm Speed, the ICC chief executive, announced that the two matches Ganguly had already missed would be part of the ban. “The initial decision of the match referee to impose this ban clearly had an impact on the ability of the Indian team to determine and select the make-up of its side,” said Mr Speed. “In light of this, the last two matches of India’s series against Pakistan, where the possible suspension of the Indian captain impacted on the selection decisions of the Board, will count as the first two matches served under this sentence.” Ganguly has thus been ruled out of the first four matches of the triangular one-day tournament in Sri Lanka in August, in which West Indies will be the third team.

According to the ICC Code of Conduct, no further appeal can be made by Ganguly in this matter.

http://usa.cricinfo.com/link_to_database/ARCHIVE/CRICKET_NEWS/2005/APR/234638_INDPAK2004-05_18APR2005.html

Re: Ganguly's appeal rejected

Though 6 match ban was too harsh but this is stupidity to count the 2 matches he was forced out by BCCI towards his 6-matches.

Re: Ganguly's appeal rejected

I think his ban or BCCI's refusal to let him play in the next two ODIs was a blessing in disguise for Ganguly. The manner in which the Indians lost the last two one dayers was a clear indication that Ganguly should be leading the side. I have been reading articles & people's opinions and just like that there is a need for Ganguly to lead as a skipper. Atleast for now.

Re: Ganguly's appeal rejected

poor ganguly....

Re: Ganguly's appeal rejected

i feel sorry for him ..if he was in the last 2 matches, those matches would have got their own taste