So Posh did you find the law?....
If you are seriously looking for the law, then here is a humble suggestion / advice.
Wear a niqab and show up in the said court, and challenge the judge for the relevant law. If he doesn't support his actions with proper article of law then appeal the decision in the higher courts. That's all.
But do whatever you do, please do not mispronounce the judge's name or worse utter an expletive. The judge or the court officers do not like that.
If you are seriously looking for the law, then here is a humble suggestion / advice.
Wear a niqab and show up in the said court, and challenge the judge for the relevant law. If he doesn't support his actions with proper article of law then appeal the decision in the higher courts. That's all.
But do whatever you do, please do not mispronounce the judge's name or worse utter an expletive. The judge or the court officers do not like that.
LOL!
The person in question was a lady. Men would oblige. For ladies in Islam, who choose to do so, headcover/hijaab is a part of Islam.
Please point of a specific law that forbids a person (regardless of their gender) from wearing headgear, if it is prescribed by the faith.
An opinion/your own view, which i'm afraid is what you're offering here, is not a definition of a law that prevents one from dressing as required by faith. If punishments are to be given according to law, then a law must be present to justify the punishment.
:)
**expletive 
Kiya khatoon ny ghyr-parliameni zaban istymal ki thi:aq:
PS: Woh kiya like kerty hain or kiya nahi,It depends victims and circumstances(wah kiya bat ki hy main or afsoos:hinna: Magar yahan dad tu kiya phitkar bhi nahi mily gi )
**
and how was security compromised if the lady was wearing head-scarve? they can simply do a scan, is that too difficult with the technology?
What if they did not have the required scanning device. You mean to say that the dept should invest in buying a scanning machine because some people cant understand the law. What if these crackpots later claim that they cant be subjected to scanning cause their religion does not allow the same. Scanning might mean taking a picture for her and she might claim that taking a picture is not allowed in her religion.
What if they did not have the required scanning device. You mean to say that the dept should invest in buying a scanning machine because some people cant understand the law. What if these crackpots later claim that they cant be subjected to scanning cause their religion does not allow the same. Scanning might mean taking a picture for her and she might claim that taking a picture is not allowed in her religion.
absolutely right!!
Re: Ga. Muslim jailed over head scarf
The lady was not asked to remove her headscarf for a security check. The specific judge in question does not allow headgear in his courtroom. That is all.
I'm sorry, but when it comes to the judge's personal preferences regarding decorum in his courtroom, and upholding basic civil liberties, the civil liberties will have to take precedence...which is why even the Jewish Anti-Defamation League is officially supporting Ms. Valentine.
Keep your backwards, intolerant policies in India please...we don't want them here.
Re: Ga. Muslim jailed over head scarf
Does that hurts?!