G M Syed lauded for his struggle

I am posting this in an effor to make more people aware of what the Sindhi qaum wanted from Pakistan and what it has actually gotten. This is not meant as a endorsement of GM Syed’s views, nor would I say I completely disagree with he had to say. He was a human and not perfect.

http://www.dawn.com/2005/01/18/nat27.htm

G M Syed lauded for his struggle

By Our Staff Reporter

KARACHI, Jan 17: Speakers at a function held here on Monday paid rich tributes to the founder of Jeay Sindh movement, late G M Sayed, for his services for the cause of ‘oppressed nations’ , saying that the veteran Sindhi leader had never compromised on principles.

They were of the view that Mr Syed, who fought throughout his life for the emancipation of Sindhi people, was a symbol of all the finest qualities attributed to the land of Sindh and its culture - peace, freedom and humanism.

The speakers said Mr Syed valiantly fought against all despotic regimes in the country to achieve rights of Sindh, which, according to his political philosophy, also included the right to independent statehood.

Most of the speakers opposed the government move to launch operation in Balochistan and expressed their complete solidarity with the Baloch people in, what they called, their ‘struggle against tyranny’.

The speakers opposed the construction of Kalabagh Dam and Thal canal, terming these projects anti-Sindh, saying these would turn Sindh into a barren land. The event was organized by the Jeay Sindh Mahaz (centre) to observe the 102nd birth anniversary of G M Sayed, which was presided over by its chairman Abul Khalique Junejo.

Those who spoke on the occasion included the secretary general of the National Workers’ Party, Yusuf Mustikhan, NWP leader Usman Baloch, Jammu Kashmir Awami National Party’s advocate Zarin Khan, advocate Noorudin Sarki, B M Kutty, Siraiki leader Majid Kanjoo, Allama Mukhtar Ali Rizvi, Sindhi intellectual Mumtaz Mehr, Muslim Shamim of the Progressive Writers, Prof Tipo Sultan (PMA) and others.

Describing the personality of the late leader as an embodiment of all human virtues, they said Mr Syed had always opposed the politics of religious fanaticism and hatred as he strongly believed in peace and stood for unity among the oppressed people.

Recalling the services of the late leader, Mr Mustikhan said the best way to pay tribute to Mr Syed was to continue his struggle against the forces of tyranny.

Mr Khan strongly opposed the military operation in Balochistan, saying that it would have negative impact on the solidarity of the country, saying that the Baloch people could not be left alone in their struggle, as this time they would be fully supported by all the opperessed people in the country.

He criticized President Gen Musharraf for hurling threats on Baloch leaders, and reminded the rulers that the Baloch people could not be subdued by force in the past by the military rulers.

He said had the government been serious in establishing its writ, it could have easily done this in Lyari, Karachi, where people had been made hostage by crime mafia for over a year.

The NWP leader urged the Sindhi nationalists, intellectuals and professionals to form a committee for holding protest rallies against any military operation in Balochistan.

JSM chief Abdul Khalique Junejo pledged to continue the mission of the founder of the movement, adding that it had been proved that the army was the sole custodian of power in Pakistan.

He said President Gen Musharraf had been using the same language against the leaders of Sindh and Balochistan, which was once used by the British rulers against the freedom-loving leaders of sub-continent, and remined the rulers that 21st century was the century of freedom of subjugated people against exploitation and national slavery.

Paying tributes to Mr Syed, B.M Kutty said the late leader had the distinction of spending most of his life as a permanent prisoner under house arrest, if not in jail because of his committement to secularism, democracy and humanism.

Sindhi intellectual Nooruddin Serki and Siraiki nationalist leader Majid Kanjoo and other speakers asked the rulers to recognize the multi-national character of Pakistan and grant sovereign status to the provinces.

The meeting, through a resolution, condemned the threats issued against certain leaders of Sindh and Balochistan, and urged the government not to launch any military operation in the province.

Another resolution called for recognizing Pakistan as a multi-nation state in the light of the 1940 resolution, thereby handing over the natural resources to the people of that area to which they belonged.

Other resolutions called for scrapping of Kalabagh dam and Thal canal projects, providing water to Sindh on the basis of 1945 agreement, and banning of immigration of aliens in Sindh.

Re: G M Syed lauded for his struggle

GM syed was a bigot of the highest degree, if you were in sindh and a non-sindhi, this guy was not your friend. It was interesting to see that while he wanted more autonomy and what nots for sindhis, he was not willing to give the same to karachites.

The last sentence in the article above is very telling "banning of immigration of aliens in Sindh" ... and who will do the work then? No one has any real reason to live in Sindh.. not counting Karachi and possibly Hyderabad.

Re: G M Syed lauded for his struggle

GM Syed was a dick and hope he is rotting in hell where he belongs with other racist and ******* people who are as bit a Pakistani as Hitler was.

Re: G M Syed lauded for his struggle

I will agree that GM Syed was an opportunist who supported Pakistan for his personal reasons more then anything else but he later repented when he saw what Pakistan bought Sindh. But it is wrong to say he was bigot, unless you think preserving culture and language of Sindh or the native population is bigotry. Many countries are dealing with problems of immigration. But Sindh is a special case in current times where the immigrants came and became the masters and left the indigenous people as slaves.

Re: G M Syed lauded for his struggle

Sadiqaan… it is a disease that all Desis suffer from. In Punjabi it is called something. This disease make people blame external or other forces for any problem instead of blaming themselves or doing anything to lift oneself from misery. Syed suffered from this disease. He blamed this and blamed that and used this assbackward reason of “preserving Sindhiness” argument, which is hollow as his head.

Same goes for all other “preservists” and self indulging idiots of Pakistan who blame everyone but themselves for their misery.

:jhanda:

Re: G M Syed lauded for his struggle

Care to discuss the status of Sindhi Muslims in Sindh pre-partition?

More migrants crossed over from Indian Punjab to Pakistani Punjabi, although they were of the same ethnic group, they were quickly assimilated to the province. Although the question of Sindh is more complex, the question remains: What was the status of Sindhi Muslims pre and post partition? For one, Sindh has been overrepresented in the Presidency/Prime Ministership, will go into details, however would like to hear your responses.

Re: G M Syed lauded for his struggle

sadiqaan can I ask you where you live ? I think you live in a western country. How would you feel if some white person there calls you alien and wants to kick you out of where you live now ?

Listen Pakistan is for all pakistanis. A punjabi can live in sindh, a sindhi can live in kashmir, and a pathan can live in makran, and a mahajir can live in multan.

Listen Sindh was a desert wasteland before partition. Actually there was no sindh, what is sindh now was part of Bombay state of India before partition, which also included what is now Indian state of Gujrat and Marastra. How many “sindhis” where there in the parliament of Bombay pre partitioned India ? There were very few. If sindh was not part of pakistan, it would have been part of India, where the sindhis would have been even more oppressed by gujrati hindus.

Re: G M Syed lauded for his struggle

Listen I am from karachi and a mahajir. And we never treat sindhis as slaves. Yes I agree sindhis are more poor, but that is because the waderas and sardars have kept sindhis uneducated. Educate the sindhi people, and stop victimizing yourself.

Sindhis have been prime ministers of Pakistan twise. Bhutto and Benazir. then who is oppressing you ? Many of the speakers of parliament is pakistan have been sindhi like mian soomro.

And listen immigrants have turned sindhi from a desert wasteland into an almost a industrial state. You know how many taxes karachi immigrants pay which inturn help poor people in interior sindh ?

So please stop his hate, we are all pakistanis and should help all the people of our country.

Re: G M Syed lauded for his struggle

People of Pakistan in defferent places have been exploited with notions of local nationalism. come on get an example from India. do you all really think the if one speak different language, they have to have a separate country?
leaders like these cant make it to national level and try to create a niche area of hate only to achieve personal benefits.

talk about rights of people yes!! dont go and ask for a new country on daily basis.

Re: G M Syed lauded for his struggle

Shak killS, what do you expect people to do when their voices are ignored by the government over the last 57 years?

Re: G M Syed lauded for his struggle

well its not only rights for people of Balochistan, its same for every ordinary person living in Pakistan, no matter what if he is living in Punjab, NWFP, sindh or Balochistan.

ordinary person life stays same. no provincial govt made life easier for them.

Re: G M Syed lauded for his struggle

I don’t deny that people of Punjab are also suffering from the army’s siphoning of the budget that should be devoted to development and services sector, but the situation of Sindh, NWFP, and especially Balochistan is far worse.

Just compare the poverty levels and real development of places in rural Sindh, Balochistan, rural NWFP and tribal areas. It pales in comparison to northern Punjab and parts of NWFP and Karachi. And compare this to the number of high government or army officials who are indigenous Sindhi or Baloch and you see the problem immediately. So it is obvious that there is a 2 class system today in Pakistan, of which the elites of certain areas enjoy most of the perks, while even their own people and all others suffer the worst.

It is easy to just say that since everyone suffers from the problem, we should not talk about the fact that the smaller provinces are far down the food chain and suffer worse than even the most poor of Punjab. And provincial governments are as powerless to begin with, so blaming them for the shortcoming of the federal government is an incorrect approach. If someone does not have power, what can they do?

Re: G M Syed lauded for his struggle

Sadiqaan, I completely agree about the under development of remote areas of the country and on the contrast doing over development of urban areas.
it should be otherway around.
i have observed this thing in western world. when they see a poor area or city. they start mega projects there to boost the economy and it has got good results.
same appraoch is required in balochistan, which has been ignored i admit. it should be treated even.