Freedom of speech & Western hypocrisy.

[diwana]

Re: Freedom of speech & Western hypocrisy.

@Med911

Its not like you LITERALLY bark back at anyone. You dont get that?!?!

The debate is over whether or not ANYONE should respond to this video, in any way other then to ignore it!

We arent mentioning anyone specifically, just in general, whether such videos should warrant a response. And we use the analogy here to illustrate the point that when a DOG (guy who made the movie) BARKS, then only mad men (those who responded to it) would bark back (protest). You get it!!! So simple!

You as always have no idea what your talking about. You just enjoy the role of troll, and your comments are devoid of even the most basic logic. Thanks for wasting precious minutes from my life in reading your post… :HeadSmack: !

I never said that I took barking literally.

I took barking back same as you call barking. Meaning degrading the religious figures and prophet of one religion.

**Protest is not barking back. Protest would be if someone calls the authorities or owner of the dog to make the dog behave.

**If you think protest is a response then again you are seriously mistaken.

Your last paragraph is very amusing.