Koi fayda nahin, they are deaf and blind .. they defend a idiot called Bush.. U cant call them muslims .. shame on them .. i guess they dont see what is happening in iraq and other countrys, maybe when their own country will be attacked by the same person, maybe then will their eyes open.. there are so many things u just question about , but they ignore those things and call it BS
You, with all your intellectual thought and capabilities are going to let them go to beleive silly conspiracy theories just because they are anti-american and anti-jewish....
will give you these same conspiracy theorists the same credibility if they said things which were anti-pakistan or anti-islam?
I dont think so....
So its not facts that you are after its just that you hate American Policies, Its allies (Israel) and you find the 9/11 conspiracy a very convenient way to hate America with....
All of these ridicilous conspiracy theories you speak off have been disproven, the jews not showing up for work was started by Hezbollah TV and you know how credible they are....
So, grow up....
If you dislike America, criticize it for what it is doing like giving total support to Israel, invading countries without any cause like Iraq, not following the Kyoto Protocols, etc....
But leeching onto these dum conspiracy theories and beleiving them when there is so much evidence and acknowledgement from Al Qaeda themselves that they carried out this attack is beyond stupid.....
Yeah, I found pictures on google of components which aren’t suppose to be on AA B757’s.
Other than that, I did not find pictures of the wings of the airplane (carbon-fibre) which are inable to disintegrate at such temperatures.
By the way, you still haven’t disproven what I said on the last page. Whats wrong?
One of the most glaring errors in the Popular Mechanics hit piece appears in the ‘Intercepts Not Routine’ section where it is claimed that, “In the decade before 9/11, NORAD intercepted only one civilian plane over North America: golfer Payne Stewart’s Learjet, in October 1999.”
Major Douglas Martin was cited as PM’s experts but according to his own
[quote]
(http://www.wanttoknow.info/020812ap)
“From Sept. 11 to June, NORAD scrambled jets or diverted combat air patrols 462 times, almost seven times as often as the 67 scrambles from September 2000 to June 2001”
The article also makes no mention whatsoever of the numerous war games scheduled for the morning of 9/11 which confused air defense personnel as to the true nature of the attack as it unfolded, as is documented by the recent release of the NORAD tapes.
One of the most glaring errors in the Popular Mechanics hit piece appears in the ‘Intercepts Not Routine’ section where it is claimed that, “In the decade before 9/11, NORAD intercepted only one civilian plane over North America: golfer Payne Stewart’s Learjet, in October 1999.”
Major Douglas Martin was cited as PM’s experts but according to his own
Scrambling is different from intercepting planes. Just because 67 times, planes were scrambled doesnt mean that 67 times that planes got intercepted…
This article doesnt need to make mention of that because its a Popular Mechanics magazine and it disproved conspiracy theories related to engineering and structural aspects of 9/11…
As for the War Games. Those games are conducted every so often and if they were happening on September 11, then its just a coincidence. Almost every single day, the navy, army, air force, FBI, cIA, etc… conduct war games or exercises to keep their skills sharp.
If Bush caused 9/11 to invade Iraq dont you think he would have made a stronger case of Saddam's ties to Al Qaeda?
no cause after 9/11 he had a reason to invade iraq, and no person in the world could stop him .. what reason had he to go into iraq if 9/11 wasnt happened?? tell me ?
no cause after 9/11 he had a reason to invade iraq, and no person in the world could stop him .. what reason had he to go into iraq if 9/11 wasnt happened?? tell me ?
What reason did he had to invade Iraq after 9/11?
Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. If Bush and Jews caused 9/11, dont you think they would have made a stronger case to link Saadam to 9/11?
Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. If Bush and Jews caused 9/11, dont you think they would have made a stronger case to link Saadam to 9/11?
Bush invaded iraq on the pretext of WMD
Forget the Jew element for now. Bush and cronies were whining how Iraq is 45 minutes away from production of WMD, how it has links with Al-CIAda and if Al-CIAda employees get hands on those WMDs how destructive those brief-case dirty bombs would be for Europe and US.
But the Question is, if Bush caused 9/11, killing 3,000 Americans but that attack could have easily killed 20,000 Americans, destroyed the confidence of americans in their invulnerability, etc.....
and he did all of this to invade Iraq, so what is the point because he would have invaded iraq anyways.....
My point was to highlight the lies of Bush and cronies, whether Bush did 911 for Iraq or not was not my argument.
[quote]
and he did all of this to invade Iraq, so what is the point because he would have invaded iraq anyways.....
[/quote]
he lied to Americans, he lied to World to garner support for Iraq invasion using 911, Iraq-WMD-AlCIAda as reason. Had he attacked Iraq without any of those I am sure there would've been much bigger opposition.