Most coutries in europe forbid weapons. In denmark fx. you cant just go around the corner and buy a pistol like in America.
In my opinion the US should also forbid weapons, and im sure, the tradegies will increase permantly. Because weapon is not the solution to be feel safe, actually it has the opposit effect.
What is your opinion, are you for or against weapon in the US? Argument for your opinion aswell.
Re: For or against??!!
Against. Don't feel like argumenting right now.:D
Re: For or against??!!
I m in favor of Weapons 
Re: For or against??!!
quit drinking chai & give us a reason.
Re: For or against??!!
Y nt ?
Re: For or against??!!
Arms for Peace ...r u scared of these weapons ???
Re: For or against??!!
MOST people who own weapons don't go around killing people- instead they use them to go hunting for deer/ducks/whatever (no, they don't generally go hunting for humans). SO I don't think that weapons should be banned altogether, BUT I do think they should be controlled better (I would even say that there should be very strict guidelines about who can buy them and what they can buy, a rifle is one thing, a machine gun is another)- so that the people who do want to go hunting for humans can't get their hands on them.
Re: For or against??!!
I am against all kinds of weapons, in all countries.
Re: For or against??!!
MOST people who own weapons don't go around killing people- instead they use them to go hunting for deer/ducks/whatever (no, they don't generally go hunting for humans). SO I don't think that weapons should be banned altogether, BUT I do think they should be controlled better (I would even say that there should be very strict guidelines about who can buy them and what they can buy, a rifle is one thing, a machine gun is another)- so that the people who do want to go hunting for humans can't get their hands on them.
I can understand what you are saying, BUT a rifle can kill aswell. i do think if those people who want to kill others, will get a gun, somehow, even its forbidden, no doubt abt tht. But dont u think if they didnt have access to guns, it wud increase the tradegies, because it wud take them more time to get a gun, and in this time they may realise tht they r doing sumthing they shudnt do!! mostly they do it in anger. n half an hour later they have a gun to shoot people with!! do u see my point!?
Re: For or against??!!
to the rest of u....come with sum arguments for y u r against or for....common guys.....cant u discuss anything else, besides bollywood gossip!!? :p
Re: For or against??!!
to the rest of u....come with sum arguments for y u r against or for....common guys.....cant u discuss anything else, besides bollywood gossip!!? :p
true :biggthumb
Re: For or against??!!
I am against banning weapons.
One: If you ban weapons then only criminals will have them and the good guys will be defenseless.
Two: Most gun owners do not kill.
Three: Even knifes, swords, sticks are dangerous, are you going to ban those as well?
Re: For or against??!!
I am against banning weapons.
One: If you ban weapons then only criminals will have them and the good guys will be defenseless. (AGREE)
Two: Most gun owners do not kill. (AGREE)
Three: Even knifes, swords, sticks are dangerous, are you going to ban those as well?
If cho had knifes, swords or stick he would not have been able to kill 33 people in a short time. would have/had a lot less casualties.