Flight or Fright

Society Religion & Philosophy
1

It is frightening to take flight with Mullah’s or Sufi’s.
Islam is a very simple Religon based on Devine Laws and it is fully logical and proves it self by the Quran:

1:3 He is the absolute Owner of the Day when all creation will have completed their journey of
existence, evolution and action to the Ultimate Just outcome.

1:4 Realizing these facts, we affirm to obey Your Commands only and ask You to help us as we do
that.

1:5 Guide us to the Straight Path by providing us with faculties that listen more than hear, observe
more than see and analyze more than process.

1:6 This has always been the way of those who get reward from You.

1:7 Save us from the path of those who had to face Your Law of Requital for blind following and
arrogance, and save us from the path of those who faltered and deviated from Your directions.

How we can explain this non-sense in our Religon?

Sufis (Mystics)

Now discover why Allama Iqbal calls Tasawwuf (Mysticism) “The Alien Plant in the Soil of Islam.” Prepare your mind for an awesome flight. See hundreds of mystics insulting human intelligence in the name of Islam. Watch them making mockery of God, His messengers, His Guidance and the Laws of Nature. They go as far as their imaginations can take them. Watch them play God, produce miracles, bash reason and kill common sense. Their true miracle, however, is that millions of Muslims still consider them as champions of Islam. Read, enjoy—have a good flight.

The following paragraph summarizes the opinion of two of the greatest thinkers of India, namely Sir Syed Ahmad Khan and Allama Shibli Naumani:

It is often claimed that the Sufia brought Islam to the Indo-Pak Subcontinent. A careful review of history gives us a different picture. Muslims ruled the Subcontinent for eight centuries, and today 80% of the population remains Hindu. The Muslims adopted and absorbed so much of Hindu mythology, customs, and traits that according to Mufti Muhammad Abduhu they became half-Hindus and half-Muslims. This happened because the philosophy of “The Unity of Being” was exactly the same among the Muslim Sufis and the Hindu yogis. The only difference was that of nomenclature. The Hindu “Hama oost” was and is 100% interchangeable with “Wahdat al-Wajood” of the Sufi. Essentially, both mean that everything in the Universe is God. It is noteworthy that a time honored book, Safina-til-Baharij, quotes a saying of the Exalted Prophet, on vol.2 pg.52: “Some people in my Ummah will be called Sufia, they will be worse than kafirs and will be thrown in the hellfire.” Let us examine some quotations from the books of the Sufia:
I am superior to the prophets (Mohiuddin Ibn-Arabi, Hadeeqa Sultania p.190).

I have denounced Islam. I believe this is incumbent on people. If Allah is God in the heavens, I am God on earth (statement of Hussain bin Mansoor Hallaj, Khateeb Baghdadi vol.8, Ibne Athir 11:140).
Men of knowledge see Shias as swines (Mohiuddin Ibn-Arabi, Futuhat Makkia 2:8).

My body has merged with the body of Rasulullah. Therefore, we are one (Shah Waliullah, Anfasul Arifain).

Allama Shibli Naumani, Mohammad Hussain Azad, Deputy Nazir Ahmed and Sir Syed Ahmed Khan noted a strange exchange of religious dogma in the Subcontinent. Centuries ago, the Brahmans (priest class) of India were alarmed as Hindu masses, impressed by the message of true monotheism and human equality, were finding Islam irresistible. To safeguard Hinduism, the Brahmans started the “Bhagti” movement in the 11th century, which preached that Raam and Raheem were one. Hindu yogis befriended Muslim Sufia. They learned tricks from each other and called them “Karamat” and “Chamatkar”. Their followers portrayed them as superhumans. Sheikh Saadi Shirazi has correctly pointed out, “Saints do not fly, their disciples make it so.”

The end result was wholesale amalgamation of Islam and Hinduism, giving birth to a new religion that has been termed as the Ittihadi Deen (Unified Faith). In the process, Hindus who embraced Islam, and Muslims who were exposed to the currents of Vedant (Hindu mysticism), all remained half-Hindus and half-Muslims. If some Hindus embraced Islam, many Muslims embraced Hinduism. Many Muslims found in the subcontinent are in fact followers of the Unified Faith. It is no wonder that Hindus are very respectful of the “Muslim” Sufis.

Here is a glimpse of the Unified Faith: Hindus worship idols, Muslims worship graves. We have Urs instead of Yatra, Tawaf of graves instead of Phairay. Agarbatti in place of Momebatti. Tabarruk versus Parshad, Qawwali versus Bhajan, Araq-e-Gulab versus Gangajal, Kharqa versus Zunnar, etc.

The priest in the church is our Allah (Ibn-Arabi, Qasasul Ulema p.53).
There is no one else worthy of worship. Come and worship me (Mulla Jalaluddin Rumi, Mathnawi 4:52).

Time for a laugh: This morning Allah wrestled with me. He floored me because I am 2 years younger than He is (Abul Hassan Kharqani, Fawaid Faridiya p.78).

Whenever Khwaja Maudood Chishti wanted to see the Ka’aba, angels airlifted it to the land of Chisht (Malfoozat Khwaja Qutubuddin Bukhtiar Kaki, Fariduddin Ganj Shakar). This Khwaja Maudood Chishti is reported to be the ancestor of the famous Mulla Maudoodi.

The great Pir (master saint) of the 19th century, Ahmad Raza Khan Barelwi, has been quoted in his Malfoozat p.32 that “Prophets are alive in their graves like ever before. They eat, drink, pray and receive their wives in the grave and engage in sex with them.”

Now watch God’s retirement plan: Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jeelani claimed: Allah has made me eternal and has joined me with Him. He has given in my hand this world and the Hereafter and all Creation (Jeelani, Malfoozat Fuyuz Yazdani, Fath-e-Rabb-ani, Majlis 51). Dear Reader, it is noteworthy here, that the governor of Baghdad, Ubaidullah Yunus, leveled the home of Jeelani, threw out his sons, exhumed his grave, burnt his remains, and plunged them in the river Tigris! (Nooruddin Shams, a disciple of the Pir Jeelani, Najoom-uz-Zahrani 6:142). Even then, millions of Muslims continue to call Jeelani Dastgeer (holder of hands).

A wife of the Holy Prophet saw a male sparrow mounting the female sparrow. She challenged the Prophet. When the night set in, the Prophet mounted her in a most furious manner 90 times and said, “See! There is no deficiency here” (Shamsuddin Akhlaqi, Manaqib-il-Arifain pp.70-71). We wonder whether these are sacred writings or pornography!

It was OK for the Pharaoh to say, “I am God”. He, of course, was a part of the Essence of God (reference same).

In Cordova, I fell in love with Fatima. In Makkah I fell in love with the beautiful Ain-ush-Shams. The spiritual windows opened upon me hence. (Sheikh Mohiuddin Ibne Arabi, Fusoosul Hukm)

Ba-Yazid Bistami could take the soul of any person whenever he wanted. My uncle Abu Raza Mohammad, upon hearing this became angry and said, “Ba-Yazid could not return the soul (and restore life). I can take a soul and return it, as I want.” Then my uncle took the soul of Rahmatullah and brought him back to life (Shah Waliullah, Anfasul Afrifain p.95).

Junaid Baghdadi was sitting when a dog crossed by. He merely glanced at the dog. The dog reached such glory that all dogs of the town followed him. Then he sat down and all dogs sat around him in meditation (Ashraf Ali Thanwi, Imdadul Mushtaq).”

v “There is no priesthood in Islam“ is a very common but erroneous statement. There should be no priesthood in Islam, but in reality the Sufi and the Mulla have formed a very strong union. They are always ready to attack any semblance of reason from all quarters and they are always vigilant to label any voice of reason as mutazilla (those who commit the blunder of thinking and reasoning).

My uncle saw me create and destroy the universe (Shah Waliullah, Afasul Arifain p.210).

Here is a funny one: The dead body of a dervish was lying in a jungle laughing. I asked him, “You are dead, how can you laugh?” The dead body replied, “This is what happens in the love of Allah” (Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti, Malfoozat).

The Universe lies within the Mount Caucasus. This mountain is 40 times bigger than the earth. A cow is holding it on its head (Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti, Dalilul Arifain). Isn’t it tragic that people of such miniscule minds are considered the saints of Islam! This mythology is obviously borrowed from Hinduism, which holds that the entire earth is perched on one horn of a cow and when it shifts the load to the other horn, earthquakes occur!

Watch for another wisdom from Chishti in the same book: The hellfire is placed in the mouth of a snake deep in the seventh level of the earth, otherwise the whole Universe would burn.

Now watch arrogance at its height: The Prophet attended the funeral of Barakat Ahmed. And I led the prayer, (i.e. the Prophet was his follower in prayer) (Ahmad Raza Khan Barelwi, Malfoozat). Sir Syed Ahmed Khan rightly pointed out that the supposed Islamic saints were frequently jealous of the Exalted Prophet.

Do not try to understand the Qur’an ever. Else, you will go astray. Fifteen “Uloom” (sciences) are required to understand the Book (“Maulana” Zakaria Kandhalwi, Fazael Aamal p.2). The Qur’an claims that it is an easy book to understand (41:3).

However, it is of paramount importance to know what Islam is not. These infractions dishonor the Holy Prophet and his companions, manipulate human rights and rob women of the high stature bestowed by God.

2

The problem these days is that only examples of extreme Sufism come to the forefront. This is probably because many, if not most, Sufi schools in our times teach outlandish rituals and un-Islamic practices. Things that have infiltrated Islam, such as circumambulating graves, pantheism, forgoing the Shari'ah, supplicating to the dead, dancing and whirling and so on, are often broadcast as Sufi teachings. These have nothing to do with Islam or true Sufism. These forms of Sufism have rightly been disproved time and again. Unfortunately, many people make up their minds about Sufism based solely on these extreme examples, as if all Sufism was like that. Of course, this is unfair. It is just as unfair as someone taking Ibn al-Jawzi's classical collection of fabricated hadith - al-Mawdu'at - and surmising that all hadith must therefore be fabricated. Negative views about Sufism are usually as a result of exposure to fake Sufis and charlatans.

Sufism, when correctly practised and explained, is a science that concentrates on purification of the soul, nurturing good behaviour, disengagement of the mind from worldly pursuits, and emphasising man's utter poverty before Allah's richness. Many classical scholars spoke favourably of Sufism (obviously not the kind of false Sufism that is exemplified in the first post above). Sufism has a role to play in developing a rounded Muslim, so long as it is followed within the boundaries of the Shari'ah.

I remember some ten years ago attending a mosque during Ramadhan for Tarawih prayer. Whenever i could i used to take my young cousin with me. On one occasion he was obviously struggling to hold himself back from going to the bathroom and proceeded to urinate right on the mosque carpet as we sat in prayer. I immediately noticed what had happened, as did a middle-aged man sat in front on us. The man promptly turned around, looked at me and my cousin and began shouting and cursing, telling me how the mosque had been defiled and that i shouldn't bring children to the mosque. Another brother who i didn't know personally but who i knew to be an adherent of one of the Sufi schools (it was also quite obvious from his dress code) calmly came up to us and related the hadith from Bukhari about a man deliberately urinating in the Prophet's (s) mosque. He reminded us that the Prophet (s) had asked that the man not be disturbed and that he be allowed to finish. The Prophet (s) then went to him and in the nicest possible way informed him that such things were not to be done in mosques and asked that water to be poured over the area. I remember admiring the calmness and wisdom that the brother had brought to the situation. He'd killed three birds with one stone - he'd shown the man who was still hot tempered that his reaction was really not the way to handle the situation; he'd reassured my embarrassed little cousin that whilst he'd urinated in the mosque mistakenly, an adult had at one time done so deliberately in none other than the Prophet's (s) mosque; and finally he'd shown me that washing the carpet with water was an acceptable way to clean it and that the mosque had not been permanently defiled. If anything, this is what Sufism represents.

Whoever teaches and believes the kind of things mentioned in the first post above should be soundly refuted to safeguard Islam's honour.

And Allah knows best.

Iqbal

3

Some more painful additions: Now justifications for Non Muslims that we got best resources in our faith:

According to Allama Iqbal, the primary reason for the creation of Pakistan was to replace this Ajami Islam with the true Islam that Prophet Mohammad had brought.

Imam Ghazali (11th century CE) is supposed to be one of the top Mullas and Sufis of the Islamic world. The copy of his famous Ehyaul Uloom, being used here for reference purposes, was printed by Maktaba Rahmania Urdu Bazaar, Lahore, and translated by "Maulana" Mohammad Ehsan Nanotwi. It is ironic that the very title of the book translates as "The Renaissance of All Knowledge." As we proceed, it might occur to you that the proper title should have been, "The Demise of Common Sense." Let us examine the heights of his flight.
The Prophet said, "The best wives are those who are beautiful and their mehr (marital gift) is small" (reference same p.74). In actuality, the Holy Prophet advised character as first and foremost in the selection of a spouse.

Junaid Baghdadi used to say, “I need sex as much as I need food” (Ehyaul Uloom p.53).

Hazrat Umar Farooq used to break his fast (not by eating or drinking), but by having sexual intercourse. During Ramadhan he used to have intercourse with three concubines before Salat-il-Isha (Ehyaul Uloom 2:52).

The best prescription for good health is to marry young women (Ehyaul Uloom 2:37).

Men of knowledge sleep on their right side, kings sleep on their left, and Satan sleeps with his face down (reference same, p.39).
Sahabi Maaz bin Jabl was dying of Plague. He said, "Have me married, because I hate to meet Allah while I am single” (reference same, p.42). Ah! The poor woman, marrying for instant widowhood!

The Prophet said that a piece of rug lying in a corner of the house is better than a woman who is infertile (reference same, p.48).

Find a woman who is beautiful, well mannered, has big black eyes and black hair, and a white complexion (reference same, p.73). This is probably Ghazali’s dream girl who he could never attract.

Do not marry a woman who is infertile (p.75). Ghazali does not say how he would test a woman for infertility. Didn’t Ghazali reflect that his sister or daughter could also suffer from infertility? Dear Reader, our criminals of Islam can only conceive of the woman as a wife, a bearer of children, and an object of desire. They forget that a mother, a sister and a daughter are also women. If only one of Ghazali’s parents had been infertile…

In Ehyaul Uloom vol.2 p.52 Ghazali goes on to say, “When a man’s organ is in erection, two thirds of his mind and two thirds of his religion have departed from him.” This is the wisdom of our “Hujjatul Islam” (meaning The Testimony of Islam, a nickname for Ghazali)!
After finishing your meal lick the cup or plate and drink its washings. That becomes a marital gift for the hoors (p.13). Are the heavenly beauties such a trivial bargain?

Imam Hasan used to divorce four women and marry four women at the same hour. That is why the Prophet has said, “Hasan is from me” (p.55). According to the Holy Prophet the most undesirable among permissible acts is divorce.

For centuries, Islamic preisthood has promoted rahbaniyat (ascetism) as great piety. The Holy Prophet admonished, “There is no ascetism in Islam” (several sources). The Qur’an (28:77) commands not to forget our portion in this world. You will note that non-Muslims are delighted with ascetics because their philosophy takes away the vitality of Islam.
Kimiya-e-Saadat (the “Alchemy of Grace”) is supposedly the masterpiece of "Hujjatul Islam" (Ghazali). Mullas and Sufis have promoted this work for centuries as a fountain of knowledge. The copy used here for reference purposes is from Madina Publishing Company, Karachi, Pakistan. The translator is "Maulana" Mohammad Saeed Ahmed Naqshbandi.

A woman who has a bad lineage (i.e. she descends from a sinful person anywhere in her family tree) is always of foul character. Therefore, it is one of the cardinal rules to abstain from marrying such a woman (Kimiya-e-Saadat p.261). Ghazali here not only violates a basic commandment of the Qur’an: “No soul shall bear the burden of another,” but also hits woman and acquits man.

Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq used to carry pebbles in his mouth so that he would not speak (Kimya-e-Sa’adat p.505). Someone should have put pebbles in Ghazali’s pen!
Prophet David fell because of his eye and committed sin with his neighbor’s wife (Kimiya-e-Saadat p.497). The Qur'an confirms that all prophets had a spotless character.

A wife should forever remain a bondwoman to her husband. Do not let her go to the door, to the top of the house, or outside (p.265).
Here is a direct assault on the character of the Holy Prophet: When the mother of believers, Saudah, became older, the Prophet thought of divorcing her. She urged the messenger of Allah, “I will give my nights to the young Aisha. Please do not divorce me.” Upon hearing this, the Prophet began spending two nights with Aisha (Ghazali on the authority of Bukhari). Ghazali plus Bukhari equals disaster.
Dear Reader, please note that our Mulla insists on calling Ghazali, “The Testimony of Islam”! Even an ordinary man would hesitate to inflict such cruelty upon his wife as Ghazali and Bukhari attribute to the Holy Prophet.

On p.53 of Ehyaul Uloom, vol.2, Ghazali further insults the Holy Messenger thus: He came out of his house. On his way he saw a woman. The messenger turned back at once, went inside his house and had sex with Zainab. Then he came out and said, “Whenever a woman comes in front, she comes in the form of a Satan.” How on earth did Ghazali or any one else come to know that the Prophet (SA) did such a thing? Were the Prophet and his followers so fond of publicizing their personal relations? Our historians try to portray the Holy Prophet spending half of his time on the prayer rug and the other half in bed. This was a man who changed the course of history. God forbid, was He (SA) so obsessed with sex like these Mullas?!

There he goes again on p.56 of the same book: Rasul complained to the angel Gabriel of his impotence. Gabriel advised “Harissa” (a herb). Ghazali and Ibnil Qayyam explain elsewhere that the herb was an important prescription since there was an army of women who could marry no one else and their desire had to be fulfilled.

The Prophet said, “If a husband has all of his body, from head to toe, filled with pus and the wife licks him all over, even then she has not thanked him enough” (Ehyaul Uloom 2:103). Could this be the teaching of the Qur'an and the Messenger, or is it the sickness of Ghazali?
Quoting Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, Ghazali writes that obtaining exquisite pleasure from sex is the fortress of religion (Ehyaul Uloom 2:73). Hanbal plus Ghazali equals disaster!

Ghazali advises that the health of a newborn baby will be better if the sexual encounter between the husband and the wife was vigorous (Ehyaul Uloom 2:76).

On p.81 of the same book Ghazali insults Hazrat Umar: Umar said, “Ask women their choice in any matter and then act precisely in opposite terms. There is a blessing in doing the opposite of what women advise.”
Hazrat Ali said, “Start your food with a breakfast of salt and Allah will remove seventy afflictions. Eating sweets causes the testicles to dangle” (Ehyaul Uloom 2:36). Strangely enough, it is hard to come across a Mulla who is not fond of sweets.

It is highly tragic that stories of this kind are being taught in our Islamic schools and masajid. This is absolutely not the Islam Mohammad (SA) brought to this world. In the words of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, Muslims are following a man-made religion. Sir Iqbal called it Ajami (foreign) Islam and I have chosen to call it Number Two Islam

4

Sahaba Kram and the Criminals of Umma

The following insults to Sahaba Karam (companions of the Holy Prophet) have been taken from a popular book, Life Events of Seven Sahaba. The writer is Ayatullah Assayed Murtaza Hussain Nasir Ferozabadi of Nasir Printing Press. He has taken all the following narratives from the six “authentic” books of ahadith and other Sunni sources.

Abu Bakr stated during his first sermon as the first Caliph, “A satan usually controls me. When that happens, stay away from me” (History by Tabari 2:440).

The Prophet said, “My companions will come to the sacred tank of water, but they will be pushed away. I will say, ‘O Lord, these are my companions.’ I will be told, ‘You know not what they have done after you’” (Tafsir Ibne Jareer Tabari 4:27).

The Exalted Prophet said, “I will be the witness for the martyrs of (The Battle of) Uhud." Abu Bakr asked about himself. The Prophet replied, “Who knows what novelties you will bring after me?!” (reference same).

As soon as the Prophet died, all but five of his companions became heretics (Another narrative says “all but three”). The five are: Salman, Miqdad, Abu Zar, Ammar and Huzaifa. (The narrative about the three includes only the first three of these) (Ibne Hajar, Tahzibul Tahzib p.8-9).

Our Mullas were still not content and went one step further. Ponder this exposition: If the faith of Miqdad and Abu Zar was measured with the faith of Salman, even the first two would stand to be kafirs (numerous sources including the above). Therefore, the Holy Prophet left only one true Muslim on God’s earth!

Once the Prophet got very angry and walked away. He went to Aisha in anger. When asked the reason he said, “Why would I not be angry? Anything I ordain, I am not obeyed” (Ibne Maja, Babul Manasik fil Haj 4:286). The companions of the Holy Prophet felt honored to obey him at all times.

Ayatullah Syed Hussain writes that Allah and Rasul had permitted muta’a (temporary marriage) with women. Bukhari and Muslim narrate of this permission and so does Musnad-e-Ahmad Bin Hanbal and that Hazrat Umar opened the door for adultery and fornication by forbidding God’s bounty (i.e. muta’a). It is not uncommon for prostitutes to use muta’a as an excuse for their activities. Is it really possible to distinguish between temporary marriage and fornication?

Asma bint Abu Bakr said, “Muta’a (temporary marriage) was practiced by us during the time of the Holy Prophet” (Abu Wud Tayalsi 7:217).

Hazrat Umar was completely ignorant of the Qur’anic verses (Ayatullah Syed Hussain citing multiple references p.59).

Hazrat Umar went to the companions and said, “Today I was fasting. A beautiful bondwoman came. I had sex with her and Hazrat Ali was present there. He said, ‘You did the right thing. Fast another day instead of today.’ I responded, ‘Oh Ali! You are the best among verdict makers’” (Tabqat Ibne Saad 2:102).

The black stone (in Ka’aba) is the right hand of God. One who touches it shakes hand with God (Khateeb Baghdadi referring to three Sahaba, 7:328).

Fakhruddin Razi, in his commentary of the Qur’an, writes that during the Battle of Uhud, Umar ran up a hill like a goat and Uthman ran so far away that it took him 3 days to come back.

During his travel to Hajj, Hazrat Umar listened to songs from a songstress, Nabat Fouadah, until dawn (Al-Asaba 2:1).

In Makkah, the Sahaba Karam used to pray in manners different from each other (Ayatullah Assyed Hussain with ref. to Bukhari, Tirmizi, Nisai, Mawatta Malik p.78-79).

Hazrat Uthman burned copies of the Qur’an. These could have been thrown in a river or buried in the ground (i.e. better disposed of), but what can be done?! Muslims were confronted with people (like Abu Bakr and Umar) who raised their voices above the Holy Prophet’s voice. What would stop them from insulting the Qur’an?! (Kanzul Ammal 6:46).

Once Aisha put her hands through the Holy Prophet’s hair. He said, your satan has come to you (Nisai, Babil Ghaira vol.2).

It was a habit of the Prophet that when he traveled at night he chose to have intercourse with Aisha. One night Hafsa wanted to have that privilege. She requested Aisha to change camels with her. So Hafsa slept with the Prophet on the camel that night. At dawn, Aisha inserted her foot in an animal hole and complained, “Last night I suffered so much torture (from being alone) that I would rather have had a scorpion sting me or a snake bite me” (Life Events of Seven Sahaba).

Maria the Coptic was sent by the ruler of Egypt as a gift to the Holy Prophet. A male cousin had come along with her. Soon after their arrival in Madina, Maria became pregnant. Aisha said to the Prophet, “The baby does not resemble you at all.” The Prophet gave his sword to Ali and ordered him to behead that cousin of Maria. Ali found him on a date tree. When he saw Ali, he got scared and started trembling. His loincloth fell to the ground. Ali observed that his penis was non-existent! (Mustadrak As-Saheehain 4:39). Perhaps the narrator’s brain was non-existent. He is trying to convince us that the Holy Prophet encouraged retribution without due trial. Another version of the story mentions the funny culprit being caught at a well. Did you know that one of the supposed important tasks of Imam Mehdi will be to exhume Maria the Coptic and Hazrat Aisha to stone them to death (“Maulana” Mohammad Manzoor Naumani, Shiat Kya Hai? p.62).

Now watch out! Tabaqat Ibne Saad 8:104: Asma bint Noaman Jonia was one of the most beautiful women of that time. Aisha said to the Holy Prophet, “You have started placing your hand on virgins.” The Prophet married Asma anyhow. Aisha taught Asma to say the phrase “I seek refuge from you in Allah.” Asma uttered these words when the Prophet approached her. The Prophet hid his face in his palms. She was sent back. Dear Reader, could this be a shameless Muslim or a scheming kafir?!

Tabaqat Ibne Saad 8:106: “Milkia, daughter of Kaab, was famous for her beauty and charm. The Prophet married her. Aisha went to Milkia and said, “Don’t you feel disgraced that you are marrying the killer of your father?”

Aisha narrated that the Prophet used to suck on her tongue while he was fasting (Masnad Ahmed 6:123, Abu Dawood 15:237, Baihaqi 4:234). Did these three Imams have any shame?

Now watch the shamelessness of a venerated name like Imam Ahmed bin Hanbal: A woman, Sehla, said to the mother of believers, Aisha, “My husband’s young servant, Salem, sometimes approaches me when I am in a thin, see-through nightdress.” Aisha advised Selha to feed Salem on her breast five times. Aisha used to advise her sisters and nieces that whoever needs to visit their houses often, breastfeed him on you five times, even if he happens to be a grown-up man (Masnad Ahmed bin Hanbal 6:27). The compiler of Life Events of Seven Sahaba shows his sensitivity by expressing his dismay on the judgement of Hazrat Aisha and Hanbal for neglecting an important issue: the man would have to handle the breasts.

The Prophet once came to a trash heap of some locale. He stood there and urinated. Hammad said, “The Prophet spread his legs wide while he was urinating like a she-camel when she yields milk” (Bukhari, Kitabal Wudhoo and Ayatullah Hussain). There are ahadith that report the Holy Prophet prohibited urinating in the standing posture. Surprisingly, this is one of the common matters of contention between Sunni and Shia Mullas.

Let us reiterate that according to the Qur’an:

The holy companions were staunch and practical believers (8:74).

They had exemplary respect, love and regard for one another   (3:103).

Allah was pleased with them and they were pleased with Allah (9:100).

It is up to readers to decide who is right Quran or these Criminals