Feedback on feedback by teggy

Re: Feedback on feedback by teggy

Let me get this straight.

The whole notion of learning and teaching online over a discussion board like this is flawed. And the evidences are right here in regards to so called questions and biased opinions made on repetitive basis.

What we have someone registers online. Claims to have certain scenario in his or her life. And based on that scenario bring end results and forces others to agree with the end results otherwise he/she calls others:

Are you serious?

What a ridiculous example!

I merely wanted my opinion heard since so and so asked me to.

You are intolerant, bigot etc. etc.

You need to grow up.

Now: ** Do we really think that person sincerely has any intention to learn??

**
Absolutely not. Aggressive and bad behavior is not true seekers have.


There are ways to learn and these people have spent time growing up with lots of opportunities to seek knowledge and learn.

Besides this is 21st century. All of the questions have been answered and are at disposal of these individuals in many many forms (electronic and paper) including finding someone IN PERSON to go to and learn.

People who pose questions and incessantly argue on religion do not have intention to learn is my point here.

Why assume one way that these people have so called keen interest in learning.

Why not other way that the whole idea of posting questions on a discussion board where more than likely the answers will be given to refute their position and be called anti-social???

Bhai sahab! People do not convert religions like that.

If these people have the courage to put thumb up other’s noses REPETITIVELY then why they act surprised and play victim when given an answer?


I am aware of what Muqa Bhai is having the discussion this moment and my position was exactly the same. The answer was not supposed to be given or if it was to be given then it should NOT have been inflammatory and if inflammatory answer was given then it should NOT have been defended and if it was defended then the moderator should not have deleted my post which was within the rules and in context with what was said and how it was said and… if my post was deleted then the inciting post should have been edited or deleted as well.

**Biased moderation is what I am talking about let alone encouraging this kind of behavior.
**


My clear question here is: I request clear answers please if at all possible. Thank you.

**Is there not any rule to act against those who ridicule God, Religion(s), scriptures, religious figures?
**
I do know when someone made fun of Hindu God a while ago, the post was deleted and admins admonished the member. I myself posted against that.

**Why is one way street here on this site???
**