Faqir of IPI

North Waziristan, a place where the Americans want Pakistan to conduct an operation. What’s the history of this land? Who was Faqir of IPI who gave the British a tough time? The reaction that our forces have faced in FATA, the same the British have seen before. Why was it that the British controlled the rest of India but they left FATA in a loosely sovereign kind of area effectively as a buffer between British India and Afghanistan?

The Faqir of Ipi of North Waziristan – The Express Tribune

North Waziristan is in the media focus these days. Everyone is guessing as to when the much-awaited operation is going to be launched against militants in the said agency. **In 1936, the British launched an operation against a lone tribal, but could neither apprehend him nor kill him. **The tribal was the Faqir of Ipi. His real name was Mirza Ali Khan, a Tori Khel Wazir, born in 1897, near Khajuri in North Waziristan. In March 1936, in Jhandi Khel in Bannu, a young Hindu girl by the name of Ram Kori and a Syed Pashtun, Amir Noor Ali, fell in love and eloped. The girl converted to Islam and changed her name to Islam Bibi. The girl’s mother approached the court and pled that her daughter was a minor and had been abducted. As a result, Noor Ali was arrested and given two years imprisonment.

The tribes protested against the handing over of a converted Muslim girl to a Hindu family. On April 14, 1936, a jirga held near Mir Ali declared jihad against the British. It decided to raise a tribal lashkar, with the Faqir of Ipi as its chief. He travelled to South Waziristan to gain support of the Mehsud tribe. In November 1936, the British sent two brigades to carry out an operation at Khasura in the Dawar area. The British suffered heavy casualties due to tribal raids and the operation was abandoned after four days. The British persisted with operations in different areas. In April 1937, a British convoy was ambushed at Shaur Tangi, South Waziristan, in which 53 soldiers lost their lives, including seven officers.

The Faqir of Ipi laid down three conditions for calling off the jihad: that Islam Bibi should be handed over to the Muslims, that the British should leave Waziristan and that all arrested tribesmen be released. However, the British did not agree and continued with their campaign. In 1938, the Faqir of Ipi shifted to an isolated place in Gurwek. At the start of World War II, both the Germans and the Italians contacted him and provided him and his men weapons and funding. The main purpose of the Axis powers was to engage the British Indian Army in the tribal belt to prevent the Indian armed forces from being sent to the main war zone. In Gurwek, the Faqir created an independent state and continued with his raids against the British Army. After 1947, he did not recognise Pakistan and continued his war against the new nation’s army. He announced the creation of Pashtunistan and a tribal jirga, held in Razmak, appointed him as the first president of Pashtunistan. He never surrendered but his following progressively declined over the years and he died eventually in April 1960.

The *Times *of April 20,1960, in an obituary described him, as “a doughty and honourable opponent… a man of principle and saintliness… a redoubtable organiser of tribal warfare, many retired army officers and political agents, who served in the area, will hear the news with the tribute of wistful regret.”

Published in The Express Tribune, November 15[SUP]th[/SUP], 2010.

Re: Faqir of IPI

I think British were more concerned about already developed areas. These areas like North Waziristan are like a headache for the conquerors or outsiders even today.

Re: Faqir of IPI

Some more information about the mysterious fellow.

History: The Original Insurgent - TIME

History: The Original Insurgent - TIMEAlong the mountainous, 2,600-km span of the Durand Line—the porous border separating Afghanistan and Pakistan—a notorious jihadi is on the loose. He is responsible for guerrilla attacks, sabotage and cruel executions; his religious fanaticism inspires multitudes and threatens to destabilize much of Southwest Asia. Thousands of Western soldiers desperately search for the renegade terrorist in inhospitable terrain. But each time they have him cornered, he and his militia slip away into hidden valleys and caves.

No, this has nothing to do with Osama bin Laden but with Mirza Ali Khan, a Pashtun holy man who revolted against the British in the late 1930s. For nearly a decade, the British army chased him and his followers through the remotest reaches of Waziristan and the Northwest Frontier Province—the same ground where allied troops have spent the past five years searching fruitlessly for bin Laden, and where the remnants of Afghanistan’s Taliban fled to lick their wounds and recover their strength. The region was then, as it is today, a powder keg of fractious tribes and fundamentalist firebrands, and Britain’s experience with trying to capture Khan mirrors the frustrating hunt for bin Laden.

Khan was called the Fakir of Ipi, after the Wazir town where he was said to exercise divine powers—like turning sticks into guns and feeding multitudes with a few loaves of bread. Flying the banner of “Islam in Danger,” his small lashkars, or war bands, ambushed convoys and raided prominent towns, killing Hindu traders and marching off with money and munitions. For colonial officials in London and New Delhi, this was no minor uprising of petty bandits. Intelligence estimates at the time counted 400,000 fighting men among the various Pashtun tribes, at least half of them armed with modern rifles. The insurgency forced the British to commit as many as 40,000 troops to the frontier, and, as World War II raged, to station a permanent garrison there even as the Japanese advanced steadily into Burma.

The Fakir tormented the British brigades, evading capture with only the aid of local informants and guides (not one fighter in his ranks possessed a radio). In response, the British imposed fines on Pashtuns who refused to cooperate with their search, bombed troublesome villages, burned the fields of unhelpful tribesmen and destroyed the houses of his ringleaders—a violent clampdown that only alienated the local population further. A London newspaper heralded Khan in a couplet as the Scarlet Pimpernel of the East: “They sought him here, they sought him there, those columns sought him everywhere.” After independence and the partitioning of India, Khan became a thorn in the side of the new Pakistan government, violently agitating for an independent Pashtunistan until his death, by natural causes, in 1960.

Decades later, the Fakir’s stomping grounds are again ground zero in a war on terror. American, NATO and Pakistani troops face a hydra-like insurgency led by a string of shadowy extremist leaders who make expert use of the border’s treacherous, land mine-riddled terrain, melting into the mountains only to resurface, ever stronger, from their myriad training camps and bases. “I doubt whether Washington in 2007 knows much more about what is happening in Waziristan than London did in 1937,” says Alan Warren, a military historian and author of a book on Khan. If so, as with the elusive Fakir of Ipi, the heirs of that British frontier force of old might, too, never get their man.

Re: Faqir of IPI

You are right that the areas have been conquered but somehow difficult to rule, as the people are very independent minded, and then the weather and treacherous terrain also helps the locals.

Re: Faqir of IPI

Ali there is a character Pale Shah (I don't know whether he is real charcter or fictitious) who gave tough time to British Government. We used to watch a drama by PTV on his life. I've a gut feeling that Pale Shah have a connection with this Faqir.

Re: Faqir of IPI

Pale shah or pale khan?

Re: Faqir of IPI

I dont know about him, it would be great if you could find something about him.

BTW whats the difference between the insurgency lead by Faqir of IPI and TTP? Have we learnt anything? See the last paragraph again of the Time article:

[QUOTE]
Decades later, the Fakir's stomping grounds are again ground zero in a war on terror. American, NATO and Pakistani troops face a hydra-like insurgency led by a string of shadowy extremist leaders who make expert use of the border's treacherous, land mine-riddled terrain, melting into the mountains only to resurface, ever stronger, from their myriad training camps and bases. "I doubt whether Washington in 2007 knows much more about what is happening in Waziristan than London did in 1937," says Alan Warren, a military historian and author of a book on Khan. If so, as with the elusive Fakir of Ipi, the heirs of that British frontier force of old might, too, never get their man.
[/QUOTE]

Re: Faqir of IPI

ninja the title of the drama was 'Pale Shah'. I think there was some movie with the name 'Pale Khan' too. God knows, whether these are real characters or just fiction.

Re: Faqir of IPI

I think in Faqir’s time it was overall retaliation against British Government. There was a recent history of rebels and agitation like Jalianwala Bagh and people could relate to Faqir’s or any movement in tribal areas against the British.

Now the situation is a bit different. TTP’s agenda is not easily understandable. They are killing their own people (people from their own religion) to take unknown revenge from so called Kafirs :bummer:

Re: Faqir of IPI

The tactics are the same, faqirs men also included small tribal lashkars and they used guerilla tactics and the slogan of saving islam. Even now TTP are using the same slogans and tactics, and instead of British (imperialists) they consider Americans (and Pakistan army for supporting US in this war) as their enemies.

If we see whats happening in Balochistan, Afghanistan, and FATA we can relate that with history. These are the people (both Baloch and Pashtuns) who can be bought by love but if you try to use force on them then there's no worse enemy than them.

Re: Faqir of IPI

^ Very well said :k:

Re: Faqir of IPI

Ok. Pale Khan / Pale Shah was also a Pashtoon freedom fighter from Zhob Balochistan. He also gave tough time to British government during 1930s

Palay Khan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re: Faqir of IPI

Thanks :)

Re: Faqir of IPI

@Ali_Syed read this History of Pashtuns: Germans and Faqir of ipi in WW2

Like taliban, he defied malaks and traditional tribal plateform of resistance. He approached not just his wazirs but also khattaks, dawars, bhittanis, bannuchis and marwats. A portion of his militia consisted of Afghan volounteers from khost and paktia. He failed to gain support of mehsuds and afridis and lost bulk of his waziri support due to pressure from malaks but he didnt give up and carried out guerrella attacks not just in waziristan but also in NWFP and Derajat. Pakistan also carried out operations against him under ayub khan, who later became president, when faqir attacked army in razmak.
Recently the name of adam-khor bazaar of miranshah surfaced. It is not due to taliban as wrongely propagated by ISPR but due to a bloodiest street fighting that took place between faqir’s forces and british. Due to heavy casaulties, it was named adam-khor bazaar by british.
Taliban commander hafiz gul bahadur is grandson of faqir of ipi

Re: Faqir of IPI

@Ali_Syed, 1960 article of The Time describe him as a honourable and saintly figure (compare it with todays Time’s description of him as terrorist like osama)
The Faqir of Ipi of North Waziristan – The Express Tribune

Re: Faqir of IPI

@marwati bro thanks for sharing