Re: Family Gate Scandal
Well you can say that, but people having some ethics are present in every profession.
i was being sarcastic... i don't believe in this list
Re: Family Gate Scandal
I am happy for the media, they have brought it upon themselves! Why did they try to hide the crimes of the biggest don of the country? Even after this crisis they have been siding with him, now they should deal with it. So called independent media.
Re: Family Gate Scandal
.
Re: Family Gate Scandal
Must watch the actual faces of media while they are not on air, but first see 02 live shows of 13th june Khari baat Mubashir Luqman k saath at 8 PM & Cross Fire Mehar Bukhari at 10 Pm
[TABLE]
Re: Family Gate Scandal
hahahahaha
Everyone should stand by SC in Riaz, Arsalan case: Babar Awan - geo.tv
Re: Family Gate Scandal
look who is talking, the guy who has a fake degree and corrupt to the core
Re: Family Gate Scandal
lulz.
Re: Family Gate Scandal
The Notice Milya khak na hilya fame guy now standing by SC!!! wonder what brought him to this decision
Re: Family Gate Scandal
Did he not receive his installment yet? 
Re: Family Gate Scandal
but on a serious note I think this should be appreciated (we can’t know a persnon’s niyyat), but everyone deserves a second chance
Re: Family Gate Scandal
Out of 340 million supposedly given to arsalan iftikhar 320 million was cash, and no proof has been provided for that. As far as the trips are concerned, he says he has paid himself. Anyways, supreme court should also check as to how arsalan has amassed his wealth in a period of four years.
Re: Family Gate Scandal
Perhaps we are witnessing the dismantling process of a rotten building ..!!
the other day , about a year or two ago , I was watching a Zaradari Interview on PTV , what startled me , was his logic , he said ,....when a building is defective , the only way to correct the defect is to first dismantle it .... those words now keep resounding in my ears , whenever I see or hear another " some Gate " or a " Scandal " ...etc ....of course there is another more popular angle called " democracy is the best revenge " .... but whatever it is ... I am sure Pakistani nation is on a " crash course " study of everything ..... how much it would have stomached by the election times , will be seen in the not so distant future ...
PS : please don't ask me for the link to that interview , because I do not have it , it was over a year or two ago ...and I do not bookmarked it ....perhaps someone else could find it ..
Re: Family Gate Scandal
Out of 340 million supposedly given to arsalan iftikhar 320 million was cash, and no proof has been provided for that. As far as the trips are concerned, he says he has paid himself. Anyways, supreme court should also check as to how arsalan has amassed his wealth in a period of four years.
According to some unconfirmed reports , the lady which went Monti Carlo perhaps one Sana ......... is a lecturer of a college of Lahore was a girl friend of Ahmed Khalil and Ahmed Khalil was also with them .
It was just a trap and they worked on it for three years .
Re: interview fixing by talat Hussain
Mr Jeem supporting CJ.
Re: Family Gate Scandal
what every one is forgetting that before this Malik Riaz , there was a Mirza Aslam Beg , and Younus Habib and his cronies Yousuf Advocate Memon.
Re: Family Gate Scandal
Lahore: Zahid Bokhari, the counsel for property tycoon Malik Riaz in the Arsalan Iftikhar suo motu case, has said that his client did not give any money or bungalows to any journalists.Speaking at a press conference in Lahore Saturday, Bokhari read out an email sent to him by Riaz in which the latter denied giving financial or other material favours to any media persons.
Bokhari said that the list of journalists allegedly given cars, property and cash was published on a Bahria Town letterhead which he said had most likely been stolen.
He said the documentation was bogus and had no legal significance.
Regarding questions pertaining to Riaz’s allegations against the chief justice and the judiciary, Bokhari said he had no association with his client’s comments.
He moreover said that “it would have been better” if his client had consulted him prior to holding the contentious press conference.
Bokhari said in his press conference, Riaz had expressed his personal grievances for which he (Bokhari) could not be held responsible.
Regarding the controversial off-air footage of a television interview of Riaz, Bokhari said “things are discussed during breaks in these programs…however, it was unfortunate that such a footage was leaked”.
Riaz’s counsel said that “the whole thing” seemed like a “big conspiracy” and said that the law should take its course and the conspiracy should be unravelled.
Bokhari said the Supreme Court did not hand “a clean chit” to any one which showed that “clearly there is some material that needs to be investigated”.
=============
Riaz denies giving favours to journalists | Saach TV
yeah right, you guys said it and we believe you, when will they ever come up with logical answers?
Re: Family Gate Scandal
More on Issue
‘I’m with judiciary but will bring more proof in Arsalan case’](http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/national/17-Jun-2012/-i-m-with-judiciary-but-will-bring-more-proof-in-arsalan-case)
Re: Family Gate Scandal
The get-CJ-by-July strategy - Mohammad Malick
The get-CJ-by-July strategy
Mohammad Malick
Friday, June 15, 2012 From Print Edition
Epicentre
The writer is editor The News, Islamabad.
“We’ll get your chief justice by July, max,” he leaned over and whispered in my ear. We were both at a conference, waiting to take our places on the stage. He was one of the speakers on a panel of which I was the moderator. The time between panels presented the opportunity to share important information.
The original plan, he told me, was to “hit the chief justice while he was abroad” receiving an award in London; but the Malik Riaz disclosures were delayed on the ill-advise of a silver-haired top legal aide of the government — a newly re-discovered party asset, to borrow someone’s words. The top lawyer, according to my fellow speaker at the conference, had advised the unleashing of the corruption-charges avalanche when the CJ got back in the country.
“Why?” I asked. A resigned shrug of shoulders and rolling of the eyes was the only response I got. So what happens now was my next question. “We will make his continuity simply unviable for the continuity of the institution itself,” he said with a knowing smile. But why did Malik Riaz suddenly start talking to so many senior journalists in what appeared to be an obvious and desperate bid for the Arsalan affair to become shoptalk? He turned, looked me straight in the eye and said, “You wanted us to wait till the court had read the last rites of the PM in the conviction case? Something bigger had to occur before that”.”
And then we were both called to the stage. This happened mid-week.
The contours of the get-CJ-by-July strategy became evident the day after, within hours of my stage-side discourse, and right in the well of courtroom 1. In what was clearly a preplanned move, Attorney General Irfan Qadir stood up at one point and addressed the bench, led by Chief Justice Iftikhar, in an extremely rude and provocative manner. He brashly accused the court of rushing through the case and dismissively asked the CJ to recuse himself from hearing the prime minister’s conviction case review. And then, insisting that the seven-member bench that delivered the guilty verdict against the prime minister had immediately “fled the courtroom,” he shocked the packed courtroom by gesticulating in a manner known to every street urchin of Pakistan.
Understandably, the AG has his personal bias against the CJ who cost him his illegal continuation in the office of Chief Prosecutor NAB, but Qadir’s behavior was still shameful. However, there was a clear method to the AG’s madness. The plan was simple: force the bench to react and respond in the same coin — a reaction that would have been presented as more evidence, a footnote perhaps, of “conduct unbecoming of a judge” in some future presidential reference.
But the bench saw through the scheme and responded with utmost restraint with only Justice Khwaja ‘advising’ the AG to conduct himself properly. For how long such restraint will last, is the real question.
I am fond of my ‘whispering’ friend on a personal level and though his politics may be problematic, his access to the epicenter of political maneuvering and intrigue in the capital is certain. He knows what he was talking about and isn’t someone whose utterances can be ignored as typical Islamabad conspiracy-theorising. Another gentleman also in the know of things had another interesting take to share on the Arsalan Iftikhar saga. According to him, the entire issue would have been ‘outed’ even if Arsalan had supposedly “delivered” on his commitment and Bahria Town had been blessed with favourable court verdicts. In such an eventuality, the favourable verdicts would have been presented as being irrefutable evidence of a criminal collusion between an erring son and his collaborating father. Unfortunately, for the CJ-slayers, no ‘incriminating’ favourable verdicts were handed down to be exploited as proof of a successfully-concluded criminal arrangement.
The first setback came when instead of cowering into a corner or submitting to the will of Malik Riaz & Co, the CJ took the bull by the horns and brought his own son and his accuser in the dock. The second blow was struck by the two-member bench on Thursday when it referred the case to the government for thorough probe and action against Arsalan, Malik Riaz and Ahmed Khalil. The ball to investigate and convict is now in the government’s court. Surely that was not a part of any Plan A, B or C.
The fundamental question at the heart of the Malik Riaz explosion remains unanswered to date: why would a super rich businessman, a multi billionaire in dollar terms, put his entire empire and his own future at risk for a paltry Rs340 million? Especially when only recently the same man doled away Rs 140million to secure the release of a Pakistani sailor from Somali sea pirates? He claims to have donated Rs850million to subsidise Shahbaz Sharif’s Ashiana housing scheme for the ‘under privileged.’ In his high roller power games, giving away hundreds of millions of rupees to politicians, generals, bureaucrats and dirty journalists is business as usual for him. So why the fuss over a measly Rs340m? He is man who has made his billions by buying the powerful and bullying the weak and has never alienated centres of power and influence. Looking at his past, his latest behavior just doesn’t add up unless one configures the picture to the much larger than that painted by the self-proclaimed victim, Malik Riaz.
The script may have been read by Mailk Riaz but he is definitely not the sole author. He has to be part of a bigger conspiracy and must have been given impregnable guarantees that no harm would come to his person, or personal fortunes for throwing himself in front of the judicial juggernaut. This raises another question: What do you offer a man who already has everything?
**
How about public office? For a man of Malik Riaz’s humble beginnings, and who has controlled the political scene from behind the curtain for over a decade, what could be more desirable than to be occupying the very high offices that he has so diligently ‘served’ — and serviced? It’s a fact that he had been assured the governorship of Punjab, both by Zaradri and Nawaz, in recognition of his mediatory services during their 2008 parlays. Indeed, Malik sahib often makes references to late governor, Nawab of Kalabagh, and never hides his desire to ‘walk in Nawab sahib’s footsteps.’**
Unfortunately, Nawaz and Zardari fell apart and so did Malik’s dreams of being Punjab’s Laat Sahib. Second best alternative: interim prime minister? Fantastical as it may sound, you can never blame someone for being overtly ambitious. Clearly the gentleman has big plans for the future and the controversial mode of his entry notwithstanding, he seems to be moving from being a king maker to a king of sorts himself. And what better beginning than slaying a giant like CJ Iftikhar Chaudhry?
For all practical purpose, public office may forever remain a pipe dream for an individual who had the audacity to justify, in a televised interview, that he offered bribes and illegal gratifications to conduct routine business in Pakistan. That he has been intelligently used is now quite obvious and it’s only a matter of time before the real players get exposed.
There is always a time to cut losses and quit and the sooner the executive and the intelligence combine realize this the better. About 60 judges of the superior court quit when Gen Musharraf sacked Justice Iftikhar. In the event of an attempted repeat of the same stupidity, the government will not be able to find a single sitting judge in any of the high courts and the supreme court to abandon the CJ and cross over the dirty line. Lets face it, the crude attempt to malign the CJ is already showing signs of failure, and showing itself detrimental to the powers that be.
Email: [EMAIL=“[email protected]”][email protected]