Please donot remove this. I might not stoop to his level but there is a limit to everything
This is the first time I am complaining on GS after being here for over two years. Would you please take note of MAdahnee (NYAhmedi)'s response in the Pakistan Afairs forum that this “******* ****” has posted. I have always held him in high esteem.
If the user doesnot find my query useful, he should not waste his time in responding.
If the user thinks that there is a flaw somewhere, he should point that out. He will be appreciated BECAUSE I am not here to prove anything rather I am here to ask/debate/be corrected on the topic I posted.
Who is he comparing me with? Does he know I have ‘4’ other nicks that I hardly used not the 2 as he has alleged. And this one is purely due to technical reasons as I was having problem with my main nick.
Have I pmd anyone, threatened anyone, asked anyone to guess who I am, written any anti India, anti Pakistan, anti AHMEDi thread.
He might be having a clout up there, must be an old member but he shouldn’t take undue advantage of that. May I suggest that he acts his age and stop being biased.
Here is what he wrote…
And what exactly do you hope to accomplish by using this nick that you couldn’t with your other 2? Do you have any clue as to what you are talking about?
If you do have multiple-nicks, and someone mentions that, the Admin can't help you there. We don't even interfere, if you DON'T have multi-nicks and someone alleges otherwise :)
Yes, the reply was not responding to the topic, but thats nothing new, cz in an online forum, some responses inevitably go here and there. If you don't like those, just ignore them.
You are absolutely right as far as your comments on that flaw in my personality is concerned. An open minded person would accept that in no time. However, I would reiterate that your response to my post was totally unasked for. I never knew that every new person/nick conjures up image of Ma’m Spie in guppies mind.
p:s, too bad the thread has been removed. It would have been great if you had answerd that in good faith. I really need to know what was so wrong about it.
I will definitly open that thread to get 'mustafeed' from your invalubale comments and offcourse other guppies too.
I used Mayhem and knew that the mere mention of 1971 and the way I brought it up would be criticized. Two reasons,
a) I used it for lack of better word
b) there was 'sarcasm' which one can sense though its not that implicit.
when I wrote that I was being sarcastic. ' what do we have to loose.... since the 1971 'mayhem' and the culprits that could be indicted are beyond the reproach of the ICC's jurisdiction...'( a reference that the Court can only try the wrongdoings of ppl in positions of power only for the events that took place after July 2002.
