Ok so in 1947 according to you they got us half Kashmir (true on not is a secondary discussion), and that automatically gives them gad-given right to burn the full Pakistan?
What kind of logic is that? I hope you are joking and you didn't mean to write this primitive triabalistic rant.
What kind of double speak is that?????????? From one side a guy says suicide is haram haram kullo haram and then comes the big ugly but.....
Adding these ifs and butts is is worse than overtly supporting suicide bombings.
Bro i smell argumentative gesture here lol.
First of All "extremists" didn won kashmir for us in "1947".
and please i will really appreciate if u could copy paste something from my post that says that they have the right to burn my motherland :) stop assuming stuff. and its not "me" who says that they got us kashmir its a historical fact.
and now coming to the second part, u qouted my "but" but didn qoute wat i said after that. it shows u r biased. first of all i agreed with ehtasab that they are not attacking us cuz US occupied afghanistan. after that i said terrorism and suicide bombings are haram in islam BUT we should stop playing the blame game, look our own actions aswell, and see wat is trigering all this "bloody holy war". they are terrorists and we are saints, lol