Again, there is no universally accepted right or wrong. It differs with cultures and over time. A lot of people think Israel did the right thing by bombing Gaza and at the same time, a lot of people think they did the wrong thing. A huge number of people were declared heretics and killed and it was the 'right' thing to do around 15th century in Europe. The same act in Europe now would be considered barbaric. Lets get back to the topic now please.
You did not answered my question, if you don't want to answer it why not say it straight, why to repeat same thing over and over.
I guess it would be better if you can express your opinion about right and wrong more clearly, Let me ask you simple question.
If someone wants to kill you, because according to his opinion your are deserving to be killed for so and so reasons, and there are alot of people who approve this action, would you call it a cruelty, or fluidity of culture and of right and wrong?
Its is serious question..
If everyone approves, I must have done something terrible ;)
If I am a Palestinian 'militant', then Israel people would think its right and if I am an Israeli Army person, Palestinians would think its right.
what does this have to do with society? Shouldn't your conscience prick you for thinking of killing your own child?
What** religion **in this world (Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism, Pantheism) advocates MURDER??????? No religion advocates this! Even atheists know better!
The ignorant b******* who commit such crimes have very little knowledge of the fundamentals of their own religion....let alone common sense. Islam was not spread through force. It was spread through kindness and mercy. Worship should be done out of sincerity, not out of fear of threats from another person.
And to not wear hijab is a minor sin compared to the sin of murder. The loser would rather gain a major sin on his conscience in order to eliminate something much minor. Disgusting.
Ofcourse, it would never be OK for the person being killed. It would be OK for some people and not OK for others.
Do you need a translation in any other language?
The question in fact was created to make it clear to you ( As i said in the post which raised the question.), your own thoughts of right and wrong, because i think that you don't believe really in moral relativism, i.e. there is no universal right and wrong. And right and wrong shall be replaced with right-for and wrong-for, as you have given the example of Israelis and Palestinians.
Why I think you don't believe in such a thing, because often and now you use some universal rights and wrongs statements in your posts. Here are some of the examples..
every culture has its twists.
If there is no right and wrong, than what do you mean by this, what universal criteria you are using to call them twists, rather than just another custom.
But then, I would accept that our culture has much more 'twists' than there are in others.
Now here you are, going one step further, i.e. comparing the cultures, now if there is no universal right and wrong, on what basis you are saying that our culture has more twists than the others..