Re: Exploitation of insecurities
Some people, specially women, perpetuate an inaccurate picture of ‘players’, like they are sociopaths with some incredible manipulative powers they use, to exploit women.
The real players dont have to do any of that. They are desirable for their looks, popularity, power/money. Women are effortlessly attracted to them. They have a lot of dating and sexual options and, understandably, are in no mood to settle down. They have their flings and sexual relationships on their terms and in the process a lot of women end up feeling disenfranchised, rejected, hurt etc, when things dont go according to their expectations. Women rationalize these feelings by saying they were ‘played with’, were manipulated, exploited, ‘used for sex’ etc…it makes them feel good about themselves and gets them a lot of sympathy.
Contrary to popular belief, most players rarely have to lie about their intentions aor make false promises to obtain sex from women.
I’m not saying the kind of players who rely SOLELY on their manipulative and exploitative nature dont exist, but they can only ‘play’ 1 or 2 women of a certain type. I would’nt think of them as ‘players’. Faking a whole relationship is not being a player, anyone can do that if they put in the time and effort. In any case doing that to one woman doesnt make you a player.
If you visit dating, sex-related or women’s forums, you’ll see plenty of plain-jane/chubby/nerdy girls discussing their grievances that they were played by a guy who exploited her insecurities by making her feel desirable…but what guy? the handsome, charming popular guy in the workplace, college, hostel, proximity etc. Not a chubby, nerdy, regular joe just like her !
here’s an example…
*(I Dated A Charming, Popular Sexual Predator - Role Reboot)
The point being that manipulation and exploitation mostly only works when the man is naturally desirable (hot, popular etc) to begin with…and that man can easily do the playing without that.*