EU Ministers Against Attacking Iraq

European ministers have reaffirmed their opposition to military action against Iraq.

EU Ministers Against Attacking Iraq](Austin360: News about restaurants, music and things to do in Austin TX) (Austin American Statesman)

RETHYMNO, Greece (AP)–Europe’s defense ministers cautioned against an attack on Iraq, urging the United States on Friday to rely on diplomatic efforts and U.N. inspections to enforce Iraq’s compliance with a ban on weapons of mass destruction. **"Our main aim must be, on the one hand to allow inspectors to go in without conditions and on the other hand to avoid war,‘’ German Defense Minister Peter Struck said. **

Struck, speaking to reporters at the start of a two-day meeting of European Union defense ministers, warned that "war would have great political consequences and worldwide economic repercussions as well costing many lives.‘’ Germany’s leadership of the European anti-war camp has caused its relations with Washington slump to the lowest point in decades.

In Munich, Germany, former President Clinton said the division between Germany and the United States over Iraq could be reconciled. "I think the way to bring us together again is to look to what we can do together through the United Nations,‘’ Clinton said, in Munich to accept a prize for the economic achievements of his administration.

In an apparent reference to the United States and European supporters of its tough line against Iraq–such as Britain and Italy–Struck said "others are already set on military action, there are also such views among defense ministers here.‘’ His comments underlined the divisions among the 15 EU nations. While Britain and Italy support President Bush’s call for a strong new U.N. resolution threatening force if Iraqi President Saddam Hussein doesn’t give inspectors a free hand, **Germany and France have urged caution. They have the backing of most smaller European nations. **

"We have to avoid a military action in Iraq,‘’ said Austrian Defense Minister Herbert Scheibner. "There has to be a political solution.‘’ Where Europeans do find common ground is that any decision on military action must be taken by the U.N. Security Council.

"What the European Union has decided is that the place where this has to be resolved is in the Security Council,‘’ EU foreign and security policy chief Javier Solana said. NATO Secretary General George Robertson also stressed the Security Council’s leading role. "It’s not a matter for NATO. It’s a matter for the United Nations and we’re waiting for a resolution,‘’ Lord Robertson said as he joined the EU talks.

Austria’s Scheibner appealed for the EU to come up with a unified position, warning continued differences could undermine Europe’s efforts to become a stronger player in world affairs. "It’s important Europe reacts with a common voice,‘’ he said. "It’s not easy … but there has to be a common line.‘’

US wins Blix backing for new UN resolution (Read parts in bold)

EU urges rapid diplomatic solution on Iraq

WASHINGTON: The US bid to secure a tough new UN resolution to disarm Iraq has won the backing of the world body’s chief arms inspector, but officials admit they still lack enough support in the Security Council.

Congress was poised to grant US President George W Bush approval for a pre-emptive strike against Iraq, ahead of a speech by him on Monday in which he will outline reasons for seeking military action against Baghdad.

The president hoped Monday’s speech would sway detractors in Congress and among the public at large, his spokesman said.

The House of Representatives agreed on Wednesday to give Bush broad authority to use military force against Iraq. After the US Senate debated the issue on Friday, supporters were confident the resolution would be approved in the coming week, most likely Wednesday or Thursday.

US Secretary of State Colin Powell and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice discussed moves towards sending a new disarmament mission to Iraq with chief UN arms inspector Hans Blix.

“I think the Security Council resolution that is now being discussed is one that I think I would welcome,” said Blix. “This would further clarify matters. We welcome this effort and I have the impression that … there is broad support (among council members) for having a new resolution.”

Blix would not comment on the debate on the form of the resolution, while Powell said he was “optimistic” that a firm resolution could still be agreed. However, Russia has strongly opposed any new resolution, saying the United Nations should concentrate on quickly getting inspectors back into Iraq.

Russia also condemned the latest US and British air raids in Iraq, urging Washington and London to use their energies in the cause of peace. Meanwhile, the European Union defence ministers called on Saturday for a rapid diplomatic solution to allow UN inspectors back into Iraq, papering over splits within the 15-member bloc on the US threat of military action.

The EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana rebuffed questions about the threat of US military action, but signalled a basic difference with Washington by saying the EU was not in favour of regime change in Baghdad.

“Our objective is not regime change,” he told reporters at the end of a two-day informal meeting of ministers on the Greek island of Crete. “The inspectors have to go and to do their job. For that we have chosen together with many countries including the United States the route of the United Nations.”

Solana said the UN Security Council, struggling to hammer out a resolution on Iraq, had to be given time to work. “We hope very much that in the foreseeable future we will have a solution from the United Nations,” he said.

Iraq was not on the formal agenda of the meeting, but clouded discussion from the outset.It also led to minor violence outside the sea-front conference centre where the talks were held. Three people were injured in clashes between some 300 anti-war demonstrators and police, a spokesman said.

**
The EU is clearly divided over Iraq, ranging from British support for the US in seeking a UN resolution threatening force, to the Germans who are defiantly anti-war.**

British Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon also rebuffed questions about Iraq. “There is a fast-moving situation in New York … it really isn’t sensible for defence ministers here to be trying to establish positions while those conversations in New York are going on,” he said.

His German colleague Peter Struck led the warnings against military action at the meeting. “A military operation against Iraq would be wrong, because it would lead to serious instability in the region,” he said.

French Defence Minister Michele Alliot-Marie, who held bilateral talks with Hoon on Friday including discussion on Iraq, said there was “unanimity” on the need for inspectors to return to Iraq.

“Everyone agreed that the threat of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq is recognised, that the United Nations alone must solve the problem to allow the return of UN inspectors as soon as possible,” said one diplomat.

Hoon also rebuffed a question about whether splits over Iraq would undermine the EU’s joint foreign and security policy, of which Solana is the high representative. “I don’t think that the EU’s discussions are quite as advanced as that question might suggest,” he said.

During the meeting Solana welcomed comments by chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix, who reached an agreement with Iraq this week in Vienna for the return of inspectors, but then indicated he would await an agreement at the UN.

NATO Secretary General George Robertson also stressed the UN diplomatic channels. “It’s not a matter for NATO. It is a matter for the UN at the moment, and we’re waiting for a resolution,” he said.

[quote]
The EU is clearly divided over Iraq, ranging from British support for the US in seeking a UN resolution threatening force, to the Germans who are defiantly anti-war.
[/quote]

I didn't know that the EU consists only of two countries. Yes it's true they are the most influenced countries, but then since it's a UNION I do consider the other countries as part of it. Thus their votes!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Ali_R: *

I didn't know that the EU consists only of two countries. Yes it's true they are the most influenced countries, but then since it's a UNION I do consider the other countries as part of it. Thus their votes!
[/QUOTE]

It is influence that really counts... Britain and Germany embody the most influence, so there is an eqilibrium...

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Spock: *

It is influence that really counts... Britain and Germany embody the most influence, so there is an eqilibrium...
[/QUOTE]

Equilibrium my a§§, you should know that Germany "normally" does back the US in any situation. I wish CHINA was part of EU and that would be more of a balance.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Ali_R: *

Equilibrium my a§§, you should know that Germany "normally" does back the US in any situation. I wish CHINA was part of EU and that would be more of a balance.
[/QUOTE]

They did support the US when it attacked Afghanistan, but they will never do that if they attack Iraq...

China, well you were saying that its the number of votes that count, so why do you want a influential country in now?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Spock: *

They did support the US when it attacked Afghanistan, but they will never do that if they attack Iraq...

China, well you were saying that its the number of votes that count, so why do you want a influential country in now?
[/QUOTE]

Correct me if I'm wrong but I was giving you the better example of Equilibrium. Got that?!

** Warning. Stick to the topic of this thread and cut out the personal
insults.**