Re: enjoy.............
Thanks for sharing PD
Waqar was simply unplayable in those days
However the sound is lagging, audio and video are out of sync
Re: enjoy.............
Thanks for sharing PD
Waqar was simply unplayable in those days
However the sound is lagging, audio and video are out of sync
yeah waqar was the best..for almost 7 years he ruled the world!
i never found the perfect video for this match....
Re: enjoy.............
Waqar-Wasim
There wont be any replacements of these two bowlers EVER
Re: enjoy.............
Aqib Javed was also one of the very best bowlers. If it wasn't for Wasim/Waqar, he probably would have taken more wickets.
Re: enjoy…
Aaqib was not penetrative enough or a wicket-taking bowler in tests. possessed a great deal of skill and guile but lacked serious pace to trouble good batsmen in tests
A good support bowler nevertheless
http://www.espncricinfo.com/pakistan/content/player/38970.html
Re: enjoy.............
Aqib Javed was also one of the very best bowlers. If it wasn't for Wasim/Waqar, he probably would have taken more wickets.
Aaqib was good but lacked the pace of Waqar and Wasim he was more of a bowler who use to contain runs
Re: enjoy…
He was not a containing bowler but a wicket taking bowler but he came during he Imran, Wasim, Waqar era that is why he was not prominent. Who can forget his hattrick against the Indians in Sharjah. A great bowler.
Re: enjoy.............
Aaqib was more effective in ODIs
Re: enjoy.............
He only played 22 tests and took 54 wickets.
Re: enjoy.............
54 test wickets in 22 tests is an average return for a main bowler. 75-80 wickets is more like. It is probably ok for a bowling all-rounder
I know it was Aaqib's misfortune that he played in a team boasting the two W's but as clever a bowler he was in the ODIs, I do not think he was penetrative enough in tests.