You are new here or mabye you have not yet met an indian in real life specially indian muslim otherwise you would have not said that.
As far as this comment from a mod you should try to understand what he is commenting on NOT that he is bashing any tendi or whatever. A WORLD CLASS player fails to show his talent in 3 or maybe 4 consective innings what you think ppl will praise him? Have you even looked at the indians own newspaper how they are bashing him, no one talks about. Man you guys are sick if tendi fails and we still praise him then you would be happy and if we comment on his batting that he is failing or not a match winner then you think its bashing well you know what kiss my a$$ we are not here to make someone happy and if someone here don’t have the guts to face the truth get the @#$* out a here.
All memebers, including moderators, can take part in the analysis, and make observations on the current form and state of play. People should not take it to heart
Look who is talking…Worry about you players like Hasan Raza,Farhats, Faisal Iqbal, Bazid Khan, Imran Abbas, Irfan Fazil and Naved Ashraf etc. and make sure they are not barred again from participating in a tournament.
AK
[This message has been edited by Asif_k (edited August 09, 2002).]
[This message has been edited by ehsan (edited August 09, 2002).]
we dont hail our new comers to be the new sensations... Bazid Khan, what is he, did we ever call him the next 'tendulkar' and start putting him on pepsi commercials so that our audience would drool? No... Infact, Bazid was my classmate, and I know he wasnt a special cricketer at all. I dont start calling ordinary chumps like this new indian keeper (whatever his name is) as the new sensation. If they are, they should prove themselves, and the way he and sachin are proving themselves, hahaha.
[This message has been edited by Spock (edited August 09, 2002).]
[This message has been edited by ehsan (edited August 09, 2002).]
England was 341/5 at the close of play on the third day. The highlight of the day was a superb knock of 197 by Vaughan.
Michael Vaughan fell just three runs short of a deserved double hundred but not before he helped England take command in the second Test against India at Trent Bridge.
Vaughan was caught behind by Parthiv Patel for 197 off Ajit Agarkar - his runs coming off just 258 balls as he flayed the Indian attack all around the ground.
He struck 23 boundaries as he followed up his hundred in the first Test at Lord's to become the first England player to achieve successive Test centuries since Graham Thorpe hit 119 and 108 in the opening two Tests against New Zealand in 1997.
[quote]
Originally posted by 2bornot2b:
*How the Indians must wish they had a Wasim, Waqar, Shoab *
[/quote]
We wish we had Garner,Roberts,Holding,Marshal in our team, Even you wish to have them after watching your bowlers at home against SA,SL,ZIM,AUS,ENG etc
AK
[This message has been edited by ehsan (edited August 11, 2002).]
[This message has been edited by Asif_k (edited August 11, 2002).]
England all out 617, a lead of 260 runs. Craig white 94 not out.
In two test matches now India has bowled three times taking 26 wickets for 1410 runs an average of 54.23 runs per wicket. That is very poor bowling by any standards. As Sdihu said while commentating "indian attack is like a lollipop, everyone licks it". India desperately needs to do something about its bowling attack to support its marvellous batting line up, otherwise they can score as many runs as they like, they will find it very difficult to win a match as their bowlers will not be able to bowl out the opposition.
People are making a big fuss about Bangladesh performing badly and should have their test status taken away.
Should the ICC do the samething to the Indians so they can get their act togeather and play like a professional team?