Re: End of the past?
Since US is the most successful country of this era, let us see what do they teach?
does they teach pre-columbus history and brag about the kings / chiefs of that time? or they just talk about their great achievements in taking over the continent, i don’t know why we are so sorry about our own self? how do we relate to Maurias, when the legacy holder of Mauriya Kingdom itself have forgotten about it?
Please do not tell me that you support and consider Raja Dahir as a hero just because he belong to the sub-continent…
Mohd Bin Qassim and others like Mehmood Ghaznavi are our heroes and they are going to remain the same, can you deny that it was Bin Qasim and Mehmood Ghaznavi who actually changed the course of history in Sub-Continent … anyway, that is not our discussion topic.
Coming back to Pak-studies, like i said in my earlier post, the history chapters are one or two at max ( that also about the freedom movement and cause of the fall of muslims in sub-continent) and remaining are the constitutions of Pakistan ( which are three), Major Exports and Imports of Pakistan, Agriculture and geo-graphy of Pakistan, The railways are there, the irrigation system is there, the rulers of Pakistan are listed their, the black day of 16 december 1971 is there, Pakistan wars are there…neghbours of Pakistan are there… whatelse you want??? please suggest what do you want to write and taught to our coming generation? abour Mauriyas? or Guptas? or what…
By the way Nadir Shah is not there in length, he is there as other invaders who looted invaded Mughal Empire…