Dog as a pet....Haram or not

Here is the background for the question.

My parents live with us in US for about two years, and then they go back and live in Pakistan for about two years, and so on. Despite of pressure from us, they choose not to live more than a couple of years in US.

Last time when they were in Pakistan, they were robbed in our house. 2 people came to house. One stayed outside, the other came in, hit my mom on the head with his gun, and get this, got his butt kicked by my 57 year old father, he then pointed his gun at my father and fortunately the gun jammed, he then ran away. My parents did have a helper around the house at the time of the incident, who ran outside to inform other neighbors.

This time, I insisted that they buy a mean ass dog as a pet, for some extra protection, but they have been told that it is haram to have a dog as a pet.

What do you guys think?

[This message has been edited by Pungay_Baaz (edited February 12, 2001).]

[This message has been edited by Pungay_Baaz (edited February 12, 2001).]

It is absolutely halal to have a dog as a pet for the purpose of your protection.

However, it has been prohibited as a leisure pet, the way it is mostly used in the west, where people have their dogs lick them and sleep with them in their beds.

According to Prophet SAW, a dog is 7 times more 'paleed' compared to a man. Anything touched by a dog has to be washed 7 times.

http://www.understanding-islam.com/ri/mi-103.htm

There is no clear directive in the Islamic Shari`ah that prohibits keeping dogs as pets.

Muslim scholars, who are of the opinion that Islam does not allow keeping dogs, have generally derived their opinion from various narratives ascribed to the Prophet (pbuh). However, it is strange that even these narratives do not clearly prohibit keeping dogs as pets. In fact, the subject matter of these narratives is also quite diversified. At one place, an incident is narrated, according to which the Prophet (pbuh) ordered the killing of dogs. At another place, it is narrated that the Prophet (pbuh) told the Muslims to thoroughly wash their utensils (six times with water and once with mud) to disinfect it, if a dog has licked it. At yet another place, the Muslims were informed that the archangel – Gabriel – did not come near the Prophet (pbuh) because a puppy was lying beneath the Prophet’s bed. At the Prophet’s inquiry, the archangel told him that angels do not go near places, where there are dogs.

As should be quite obvious, these narratives have generally prompted dislike toward dogs and a tendency of restrain against keeping dogs as pets.

However, on the contrary, a number of other narratives ascribed to the Prophet (pbuh), explicitly mention that there is no harm in keeping a dog for the purpose of guarding a territory, guarding agricultural crop or for hunting. Moreover, the Qur’an has also mentioned that there is no harm in eating an animal even if it dies, while grabbed by a dog, which has been properly trained for hunting. Furthermore, the Qur’an has also referred to the fact that the Asshaab-e-Kahaf (companions of the cave) also had their dog with them, which clearly evidences the fact that dogs have historically been used for guarding the person and the property of its owners.

In view of the apparently contradicting information, it seems more appropriate that any narratives, which mention the prohibition of keeping dogs, should be analyzed in the light of these references of the Qur’an, rather than deriving any absolute directives of the Shari`ah from them. We must not forget, that whatever has been reported in such narratives is only an ascription to the Prophet (pbuh), which could so easily have been – intentionally or unintentionally – altered during transmission from one narrator to another. These narratives do not necessarily contain the exact words of the Prophet (pbuh).

The mere fact that the Qur’an has allowed eating an animal even if it dies, while grabbed by a trained hunting dog, clearly evidences the fact that it is not prohibited to keep and subsequently train dogs. After all, how can a dog be trained in hunting, without being kept? All such narratives in which a dislike of the Prophet (pbuh) or the angels has been mentioned, as well as those which mention the thorough washing of utensils and those which mention the Prophet’s directive regarding the killing of dogs, should be explained in the light of the fact that the Qur’an has neither disallowed nor expressed any dislike for people who keep dogs (refer to the narrative of the Qur’an regarding the Asshaab-e-Kahaf).

In view of the above explanation, it is my opinion that Islam does not prohibit keeping, training, feeding or patting a dog.

I hope this helps. In case any aspect of question remains unanswered, please feel free in writing back to me at your own convenience.

May God guidance to the path of his liking.

Regards,

The Learner


They shoot partypoopers, don’t they?

Just to add to that

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

I’m just going to post some sections from Yusuf Al-Qaradawi’s book, The Lawful and the Prohibited in Islam.

Keeping Dogs Without Necessity

Keeping dogs inside the house without any necessity merely as pets was forbidden by the Prophet (peace be on him). When we observe how lavishly the well-to-do treat their dogs while despising their relatives, and how much attention they give their dogs while neglecting their neighbors, we realize the wisdom of this prohibition. Moreover, the presence of a dog makes the household utensils unhygienic due to their licking of them. The Prophet (peace be on him) said, ‘If a dog licks a plate (or pot), clean it seven times, of which one time should be with sand (or earth).’ (Reported by al-Bukhari.)

Some scholars are of the opinion that the reason for prohibiting the keeping of dogs may be because they bark at visitors, scare away the needy who come to ask for charity, and chase and try to bite passers-by.

The Prophet (peace be on him) said, Jibril came to me and said, ‘I came to you yesterday but what stopped me from entering was that there was a statue at the door, a curtain with figures on it in the house, and a dog inside the house. So order that the head of the statue be broken off so that it resembles the trunk of tree, that the curtain be cut and made into two pillows to recline on, and that the dog be taken out.’ (Reported by AbDaoud, al-Nisai, al-Tirmidhi, and by Ibn Hibban in his Sahih.)

This prohibition is limited to keeping dogs without need or benefit.

The Permissibility of Keeping Hunting Dogs and Watch Dogs

Dogs which are kept for a purpose, such as hunting, guarding cattle or crops and the like are exempted from the above ruling. In a hadith reported by both al-Bukhari and Muslim, the Prophet (peace be on him) said, 'Whoever keeps a dog except for hunting or for guarding crops or cattle will lose one large measure (qirat) of his reward each day.

On the basis of this hadith some jurists argue that the keeping of dogs as pets can be classified as makruh rather than haram, as the haram is absolutely prohibited without regard to whether there is a decrease in reward or not.

However, the prohibition of keeping dogs in the house does not mean that dogs may be treated cruelly or that they should be eradicated. Referring to the following verse of the Qur’an, *‘There is not an animal on the earth, nor a bird flying upon two wings, but comprise nations like yourselves.’ *(6:38), the Prophet (peace be on him) said, ‘If dogs were not a nation (ummah) among nations, I would have ordered that they be killed.’ (Reported by Abu Daoud and al-Tirmidhi. (This was said by the Prophet following Jibril’s remark that angels do not enter a house in which there is a dog. Trans.))

The Prophet (peace be on him) told his Companions a story concerning a man who found a dog in the desert panting and licking the dust due to thirst. The man went to a well, filled his shoes with water, and relieved the dog’s thirst. Said the Messenger of Allah (peace be on him), “Allah appreciated this and forgave him all his sins.”(Reported by al-Bukhari.)

The Findings of Scientific Research Relative to Keeping Dogs

Some lovers of the West in Muslim countries claim to be full of love and compassion for all living creatures and they wonder why Islam warns against this “best friend” of man. For their benefit, we quote here a lengthy excerpt from an article by the German scientist, Dr. Gerard Finstimer, (Translated from the German magazine Kosinos.)

in which the author sheds light on the dangers to human health resulting from keeping dogs or coming in contact with them. He says:

The increasing interest shown by many people in recent times in keeping dogs as pets has compelled us to draw public attention to the dangers which result from this, especially because pet dogs are hugged and kissed and permitted to lick the hands of the young and the old, and what is worse, to lick the plates and utensils which are used by human beings for eating and drinking.

Besides being unhygienic and uncouth, this practice is bad manners and abhorrent to good taste. However, we are not concerned with such matters. leaving them to be addressed by teachers of etiquette and good taste.

Rather this article is intended to present some scientific observations.

From the medical point of view, which is our main concern here, the hazards to human health and life from keeping and playing with dogs are not to be ignored. Many people have paid a high price for their ignorance, as the tapeworm carried by dogs is a cause of chronic disease, sometimes resulting in death.

This worm is found in man, in cattle, and in pigs, but it is found in fully-developed form only in dogs, wolves and rarely in cats. These worms differ from others in that they are minute and invisible, consequently, they were not discovered until very recently.

He continues,

Biologically the developmental process of this worm has some unique characteristics. In the lesions caused by them, one worm gives rise to many heads which spread and form other and varied kinds of lesions and abscesses. These heads develop into full-grown worms only in dogs’ tonsils. In humans and in other animals they appear as lesions and abscesses completely different from the tapeworm itself In animals the size of an abscess may reach that of an apple, while the liver of the infected animal may grow from five to ten times its normal size. In human beings the size of the abscess may reach that of a clenched fist or even the head of an infant; it is filled with yellow fluid weighing from ten to twenty pounds. In the infected human it may cause diverse kinds of inflammations in the lungs, muscles, spleen, kidneys, and brain, and appears in such different forms that specialists, until very recently, had difficulty in recognizing it.

In any case, wherever this inflammation is found, it poses great danger to the health and life of the patient. What is worse is that, in spite of our knowledge of its life history, origin, and development, we have not been able to devise a cure for it, except that in some instances these parasites die out, possibly because of antibodies produced in the human body. Unfortunately, cases in which such parasites die without causing damage are rare indeed. Moreover, chemotherapy has failed to produce any benefit, and the usual treatment is surgical removal of the abscessed parts of the body. For all these reasons we should use all possible resources to fight against this dreadful disease and save man from its dangers.

Professor Noeller, through post-mortem dissection of human bodies in Germany, found that the incidence of infection with dogs’ worms is at least one percent. In some places such as Dalmatia, Iceland, southeastern Australia, and Holland, where dogs are used for pulling sleds, the incidence rate of tapeworm among dogs is 12 percent. In Iceland the number of people who suffer from the inflammation caused by this worm has reached the rate of 43 percent. If we add to this the human suffering, the loss of meat because of infection of cattle, and the permanent danger to human health because of the presence of tapeworms, we cannot be very complacent toward this problem.

Perhaps the best way to combat the problem is to limit the worms to dogs and not let them spread, since in actuality we need to keep some dogs. We should not neglect to treat dogs when necessary by getting rid of the tapeworms in their tonsils and perhaps repeating this process periodically on shepherd dogs and watchdogs.

Man can protect his life and health by keeping a safe distance from dogs. He should not hug them, play with them, or let them come close to children. Children should be taught not to play with dogs or to fondle them. Dogs should not be permitted to lick children’s hands or come to places where they play. Unfortunately, dogs are allowed to roam about everywhere, especially in places where children play, and their bowls are scattered throughout the house. Dogs must have their own separate bowls, and they must not be allowed to lick bowls and plates used by humans. They should not be allowed inside grocery stores, restaurants, or marketplaces. In general, great care must be taken that they do not come in contact with anything which is used by people for eating and drinking.

We already know that the Prophet (peace be on him) forbade mixing with dogs, and that he warned against their licking plates and against keeping them without necessity. How is it possible that the teachings of an unlettered Arab, Muhammad, should agree with the latest findings of scientific research? Truly, we cannot say anything except to repeat the words of the Qur’an: ‘Nor does he speak from (his own) desire. It is nothing other than a revelation sent down.’ (53:3-4)

[This message has been edited by Girl from Quraysh (edited February 13, 2001).]

Thank you guys for your posts. I really appreciate it.

Great info…

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

Just a note: In west people would rather have Dogs than have kids. The Dog will listen, you say sit and he will SIT. A child will make you say the same thing 10 times and than consider listening to you…most of the time.

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/hehe.gif

Just pointing it out, don’t get mad at me again.

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/wink.gif


V~V~VHe came, He saw, He conqueredV~V~V**


----*High Priest-OF-Painful Truth*----


**“Nay! We hurl truth against falsehood, so it destroys it: and behold, falsehood is vanquished…”**Quran, al-Furqaan 25:33 ]

Following Saheeh Hadeeth should also help answer the question:

Saheeh Bukahari:
Volume 4, Book 54, Number 539:
Narrated Abu Talha:
The Prophet said, "Angels do not enter a house which has either a dog or a picture in it."

Saheeh Bukahari:
Volume 4, Book 54, Number 541:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "If somebody keeps a dog, he loses one Qirat (of the reward) of his good deeds everyday, except if he keeps it for the purpose of agriculture or for the protection of livestock. "

Saheeh Bukahari:
Volume 4, Book 54, Number 542:
Narrated Sufyan bin Abi Zuhair Ash-Shani:
That he heard Allah's Apostle saying, "If somebody keeps a dog that is neither used for farm work nor for guarding the livestock, he will lose one Qirat (of the reward) of his good deeds everyday."

Saheeh Muslim:
Book 010, Number 3821:
Ibn Umar (Allah be pleased with them) narrated Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: He who kept a dog ther than one meant for watching the fields or herds or hunting would lose one qirat every day out of his reward (with God).

Saheeh Muslim:
Book 010, Number 3824:
Abu Huraira (Allah be pleased with him) reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: He who kept a dog would lose out of his deeds equal to one qirat every day. except (one kept) for watching the field or herd.

Saheeh Muslim:
Book 010, Number 3827:
Abu Huraira (Allah be pleased with him) reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: He who kept a dog, but not meant for hunting or watching the herd, would lose one qirat of reward every day.

Saheeh Muslim:
Book 010, Number 3828:
Sufyan b. Abu Zuhair (he was a person belonging to the tribe of Shanu'a and was amongst the Conpanions of Allah's Messenger [may peace be upon him ) said: I heard Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) as saying: He who kept a dog (other than that) which is indispensable for watching the field or the animals would lose one qirat out of his deeds every day. As-Sa'ib b Yazid (one of the narrators) said: Did you hear it from Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him)? He said: Yes. by the Lord of this mosque.

[This message has been edited by Musalman (edited February 13, 2001).]