So in this day and age of weapons of Mass destruction does the United States
Have these terrible biological, chemical and nuclear weapons?
If So
Then instead of being a hypocrite they should show the world they are destroying these weapons allow UN inspectors in to verify these actions and also produce a dossier made available & allow Iraq to photocopy the dossier as well as handle the distribution of these dossiers!
:rocketup:
I totally agree wit u.....but unfortunately the USA is the only superpower in this world we live in today!
and it is way stronger than any other nation
so noone can force them!
No the US has no weapons, there stuck in the civil war era, still fighting over slavery. :rotfl"
More importantly..are they actively Developing WMD's ? chemical / biological and nuclear ?
YES
Wrong!
The US is not actively developing biological/chemical weapons, they are signatory to treaties forbidding either and even according to Dr Ken Alibek, a former USSR bioweapons expert, who defected in 1993, the US kept its side of the bargin.
This is simply a superpower with an ethical and moral sense of reality who keep there word.
Read BIOHAZARD, by Ken Alibek.
Yes. The U.S. does have WMD's.
They are called Nukes.
Obviously I accept that, but the US does not use non Nuclear WMD's-its against there own set of rules for war.
what a joke
Agent Orange ring bells mo how about depleted uranium 
Agent Orange was used to simply destroy the jungle cover for the Vietcong militia who would hide behind civilians to avopid fighting the US troops 1-to-1.
DU shells are common place, we (Pakistan) also use them-why dont you deal with your backyard first before asking your neighbour to fix his! (Or hers!). :)
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by mo_best: *
Agent Orange was used to simply destroy the jungle cover for the Vietcong militia who would hide behind civilians to avopid fighting the US troops 1-to-1.
DU shells are common place, we (Pakistan) also use them-why dont you deal with your backyard first before asking your neighbour to fix his! (Or hers!). :)
[/QUOTE]
Why don't you ask US where those DU come from?! Who is the main exporter of weapons and WMD programmes and know how distributer?
Note: Not even Judea would have sold his mother to Poncius Pilatos but some here are capable of doing so!
Does AMERICA have WMDs
Rather it should be asked which, is the only country to date to have acutually used nuclear weapons, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians deliberately?
A classic response from the anti US factions, most probably sitting in NY someplace with a $50K+ a yr job and enjoying the fruits of the "GReat Satan".
The US did drop 2 A bombs on Japan, but that was in order to bring a quick end to the war and thus in the long run save lives. It ended a brutal war in the space of 2 bombs, that is a humanitarian move with noble objectives.
I am not sure what you study (or studied) at Uni yaar, but I am just now studying WW2 and US involvement in it, and it is clear that the US acted not out of stupidity, but compassion for humanity and also to send a signal to Stalin about the power of the US. This was tried at Potsdam but he just played it cool.
[quote]
Does AMERICA have WMDs?
[/quote]
yeah .. they have LOTTs :) ... Did you not see the aftermath of one going off?
:rotfl"
Good one man. Political humour is usually reserved for
"Have I got News For You"
The question should have been:
"How many WMDs would be left after America destroys the world a few times over"
[QUOTE]
Originally posted by mo_best: *
**A classic response from the anti US factions, most probably sitting in NY someplace with a $50K+ a yr job and enjoying the fruits of the "GReat Satan".*
Exactly! You will know about us.
*The US did drop 2 A bombs on Japan, but that was in order to bring a quick end to the war and thus in the long run save lives. It ended a brutal war in the space of 2 bombs, that is a humanitarian move with noble objectives. *
Very true so next time to bring a war to a end is not to begin with it they used cheap methods and It is in history and you cannot deny history. But you are right you can change history or change assumptions the way you find it suitable for you.
I am not sure what you study (or studied) at Uni yaar, but I am just now studying WW2 and US involvement in it, and it is clear that the US acted not out of stupidity, but compassion for humanity and also to send a signal to Stalin about the power of the US. This was tried at Potsdam but he just played it cool.
Who wrote those books you are studying? Persians? Hebrons? Celtics?
Plain stupidity to display a total blunder into something positive. That's how past traditions have been changed to suit on a person's demand.
[/QUOTE]
We just have difference of opinion here yaar.
USA:
Upto 70,000 nuclear weapons in their arsenal, ICBMs equipped with thermonuclear devices along with nuclear bombs.
The 2nd largest Chemical weapon stockpile after Russia.
The largest Biological weapon stockpile.
Well here are 50 Facts About U.S. Nuclear Weapons](http://www.brook.edu/fp/projects/nucwcost/50.htm)
Note how in 1998, the US was still spending over $35 billion on all US Nuclear weapons, and weapons-related programs.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by mo_best: *
We just have difference of opinion here yaar.
[/QUOTE]
Those matter!