Does Allah exist?

Perhaps I should have mentioned the complete set of ayat.

Please view the ayat:

YUSUFALI: They will say to their skins: “Why bear ye witness against us?” They will say: "Allah hath given us speech,- (He) Who giveth speech to everything: He created you for the first time, and unto Him were ye to return.
PICKTHAL: And they say unto their skins: Why testify ye against us? They say: Allah hath given us speech Who giveth speech to all things, and Who created you at the first, and unto Whom ye are returned.
SHAKIR: And they shall say to their skins: Why have you borne witness against us? They shall say: Allah Who makes everything speak has made us speak, and He created you at first, and to Him you shall be brought back.

Source


I then again read Tafsir of the ayat in question which reads as follows:

{ وَقَالُواْ لِجُلُودِهِمْ لِمَ شَهِدتُّمْ عَلَيْنَا قَالُوۤاْ أَنطَقَنَا ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِي أَنطَقَ كُلَّ شَيْءٍ وَهُوَ خَلَقَكُمْ أَوَّلَ مَرَّةٍ وَإِلَيْهِ تُرْجَعُونَ](http://javascript:Open_Menu()) }

And they will say to their skins, ‘Why did you bear witness against us?’ They will say, ‘God made us speak, Who gave speech to all things, in other words, [all things] which He wanted to [be able to] speak. And He created you the first time, and to Him you will be returned: it is said that this statement is made by their skins; but it is also said to be God’s words, as is the case with what follows, for it is similar in context to what preceded, namely, that the One with the power to originate you without any precedent and restore you to life after death, also has the power to make your skins and your limbs speak.

Source Tafsir Al Jalalayn


To be very frank. At the day of judgement we will not be in our body. We will be in SOULs. The only thing I can think of skins bearing witness against our deeds is in this world. And as far as I can remember with my very limited knowledge that the whole body does not have prints which can match our fingers.

This is something interesting I read online:

A fingerprint is an impression of the friction ridges of all or any part of the finger. A friction ridge is a raised portion of the epidermis on the palm and fingers or sole and toe skin, consisting of one or more connected ridge units of friction ridge skin. These ridges are sometimes known as “dermal ridges” or “dermal papillae”.

…No two fingerprints have ever been found identical in many billions of human and automated computer comparisons…

Source


I guess I dont have to say much on this.

I to be honest was very worried about this one. I word corruption and pollution cannot have similar meanings.

However again please view the full ayat in the context:

030.041
YUSUFALI: Mischief has appeared on land and sea because of (the meed) that the hands of men have earned, that (Allah) may give them a taste of some of their deeds: in order that they may turn back (from Evil).
PICKTHAL: Corruption doth appear on land and sea because of (the evil) which men’s hands have done, that He may make them taste a part of that which they have done, in order that they may return.
SHAKIR: Corruption has appeared in the land and the sea on account of what the hands of men have wrought, that He may make them taste a part of that which they have done, so that they may return.

Source


Also see what does tafsir say about this Ayat:

{ ظَهَرَ ٱلْفَسَادُ فِي ٱلْبَرِّ وَٱلْبَحْرِ بِمَا كَسَبَتْ أَيْدِي ٱلنَّاسِ لِيُذِيقَهُمْ بَعْضَ ٱلَّذِي عَمِلُواْ لَعَلَّهُمْ يَرْجِعُونَ](http://javascript:Open_Menu()) }

Corruption has appeared on land, in the wastelands, because of the rain being withheld and the vegetation diminishing, and on sea, in lands near rivers because of their waters diminishing, because of what people’s hands have perpetrated, of acts of disobedience, that He may make them taste (li-yudhīqahum; or [may be read] li-nudhīqahum, ‘that We may make them taste’) something of what they have done, that is, the punishment for it, that perhaps they may repent.

Source


You said "this again is not very clear cut. corruption? what kind of corruption?".

First of all the verse use the word Corruption or Mischief for sea and land both. Now one should clearly deny that corruption means political or social or society corruption. Becasue you can probably associate corruption with land but not with sea. I think its a metaphor.

I think rather than me re iterating the Tafsir if you read it with more attention then you ll see what I meant.

Peace d-tox..ed bro

Up until now I have been reading both opinions on these verses with great interest and humour because most of the given definitions have two correct interpretations and one does not necessarily overrule the other.

However, in this section what you have written above, I would like you to qualify. Are you sure that we will be not be in our bodies on the Day of Judgement?

Please look at the section highlighted below from the Surah Al-Qiyyamah.

In one verse it is clear that we are going to be reassembled in the body on The Day of Judgement and in the other verse it mentions finger tips, because the Wisdom in the Qur'an knows that is how people are identified.

So whereas what you posted regarding skins speaking that is subject to argument, but in this case the verse clearly speaks of finger tips but not as them speaking against us, but being a means to identify us. Which is what fingerprinting is used for in this world, but you see Allah (SWT) is not saying that the miraculous event of reassembling will NOT happen ... rather it will happen right to the very last detail of our fingerprints.

Enjoy the read ....

Surah 75

1 I swear by the Day of Resurrection;

2 And I swear by the self-reproaching person (a believer).

3 Does man (a disbeliever) think that We shall not assemble his bones?

4 Yes, We are Able to put together in perfect order the tips of his fingers.

5 Nay! (Man denies Resurrection and Reckoning. So) he desires to continue committing sins.

6 He asks: "When will be this Day of Resurrection?"

7 So, when the sight shall be dazed,

8 And the moon will be eclipsed,

9 And the sun and moon will be joined together (by going one into the other or folded up or deprived of their light, etc.)

10 On that Day man will say: "Where (is the refuge) to flee?"

11 No! There is no refuge!

12 Unto your Lord (Alone) will be the place of rest that Day.

Those were not very polite comments and I will take them as a joke. I think you have mis understanding that I am trying to mis lead people with wrong information. This is not the case however I am open to criticisism.

Well for above post I guess you forgot to view what was written just below the verse quoted. It is very clear from the post that I am not saying that Mules and Asses are new form of transportation however they are the indication that transport system will evolve.

Also remember that I am quoting two different verses from differnet chapters and comparing the conditions. The last line of the verse is clearly suggesting that before people used to ride camels then Horses and Asses and then they will ride on transport “what you do not yet known”.


Lets view the verses again:

016.008YUSUFALI: And (He has created) horses, mules, and donkeys, for you to ride and use for show; and He has created (other) things of which ye have no knowledge.
PICKTHAL: And horses and mules and asses (hath He created) that ye may ride them, and for ornament. And He createth that which ye know not.
SHAKIR: And (He made) horses and mules and asses that you might ride upon them and as an ornament; and He creates what you do not know.

Source


Also view the Tafsir:

{ وَٱلْخَيْلَ وَٱلْبِغَالَ وَٱلْحَمِيرَ لِتَرْكَبُوهَا وَزِينَةً وَيَخْلُقُ مَا لاَ تَعْلَمُونَ](http://javascript:Open_Menu()) }

And, He created, horses and mules and asses, that you may ride them, and for adornment (wa-zīnatan is an object denoting reason; the use of both of these reasons ‘to ride’ and ‘for adornment’] as illustrations of [God’s] graces does not preclude that they may have been created for other purposes, such as for consumption in the case of horses — which is established [as lawful] by a hadīth in both Sahīhs [of Bukhārī and Muslim]); and He creates what you do not know, of marvelous and strange things.

Source


I hope there is no ambguity left now?

Re: Does Allah exist?

actually detoxed, i dont believe you are trying to mislead people on purpose. you are just misled yourself and you want others to follow in your footsteps. you are trying to come up with definitions to prove what is not there. and you are trying to look for clues that will prove that what you believe in is the right thing.
that is not your fault. we humans are prone to it all the time. we feel proud when someone shares our ideas. and we also like ideas that we best understand. you are just familiar with these ideas. you have been told that the scriptures are the real truth, that they are the only touchstone of acceptability. you have been groomed to not question their validity. and that is the reason that you will always look for material that will prove that they are right. because it serves your ego. because it makes you feel elevated.
thank you very much for listening.

وَلاَ أُقْسِمُ بِٱلنَّفْسِ ٱللَّوَّامَةِ](http://javascript:Open_Menu()) Ch 75, V 2)

The Quran has mentioned three stages of development of the human soul.

The first stage is called Nafs Ammarah (The uncontrollable spirit), when the animal in man is predominant.

The second stage is that of Najs Lawwamah (the self accusing spirit), when man’s awakened concscience upbraids him for doing bad deeds and restrains his passions and appetites. At this stage the human in man gets the upper hand. It is the beginning of his moral resurrection and therefore has been cited here in evidence of the final resurrection. If man has no responsibility, and if he is not to account for his actions in the afterlife, then why this pricking of conscience at the doing of an evil deed?

The third and the highest stage of development of the human soul, however, is that of Nafs Mutmainnah (the soul at rest). At this stage the human soul becomes practically immune to failure or faltering and is at peace with Creator.

I will read more on this and get back.

P.S - The doubts in my mind for following two verses are that whether Allah is saying that he can do this and will he do it or is he saying this for disbelievers that he has the power to do this but will he actually do this. Also then questions arising my mind are if we are going to be raised in our bodies on the day of judgement then will we enter Jannah/Dozakh with the same bodies? How long will be survive i nthose bodies? Will we die again and again and ressurected. In my personal opinion the life after death is only possible in spirtual form. There is no other explanation for above question in my mind. I do not know how to combine verse number 2 to verse number 3 and 4. I need to read more on this.

diseases of all kinds appear all the time. some of them are incurable until a time when the medical science reaches a point where it can be curable. I believe it is a matter of time before there is discovery of a cure for AIDS. cancer was incurable at one point but it is not fatal any more. many other simple diseases were incurable in the past. but some have been wiped out of the face of the Earth. they dont exist anymore.
we hope that AIDS might be wiped out of surface of the Earth. lets say that happens. what then? what will be the answer of the theologians to that. will you look for a new disease that will be incurable and call it the disease that was supposed to be meant from this ayah?
there are several reasons why AIDS has been pointed out by theologian for this reference.there are many other diseases that are incurable, but AIDS has that fear factor involved because it has that fatality attached to it.
AIDS has been chosen by the theologians because (1) one of the methods of its spreading is sex (2) it is incurable at this time (3) it has death attached to it, and thus the dread that comes along with it.
they wont chose a disease like Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS or the Lou Gehrig Disease) because even though it kills quicker than AIDS, it is not spread by sex. they wont go for genital warts because even though it is spread by sex( the latest famous victim being Sohaib Akhtar), it wont kill a person.
one person could get AIDS simply by having sex ONCE with an infected person. another could have sex out of marital bounds hundreds of times before he ever catches the diseases. he might never get it if he is a little careful in choosing his partners.
why would God punish the one time disgression of the first person, and not punish the second person for hundreds of times. and why would God create sex for procreation(creating life), and then do the exact opposite ( take life away) when someone involves in it.
and what about that person who is faithful but his partner is not? and he or she gets the disease through the partner, even though they might be married and having "legal" sex in the eyes of God.
I guess God did not have that much time to think about the innocents who came under the guillotine.
can you reply to all this? please be logical. dont give me ahadiths and stuff. give me the answers to the question that i have raised.

I also pray that it becomes curable for innocent souls. But lets not jump to conclusions very quickly. Humans at the moment cant even cope with simple virus of Swine Flu (which to be honest is a FLU) and comparing that to AIDS is just impossible. Lets wait and see what the future holds. Even if there is a cure possible for AIDS then you never know another sex related life threatning disease may come. At that stage Quran prophecy will still remain intact. As Quran is not bound to mention the name of the disease however it has mentioned the conditions which at this time and age are comparative to AIDS.

Cancer is not related to sexual transmitted disease (some partcular cancer may which I am unaware of). Cancer is however stil life threatning at least some kind of cancers i.e Breast!

I have answered this in first paragraph.

exactly my point and fulfilment of the Prophecy.

When did Shoaib Akhter had this...Is this the reason he i sout of the world cup 2020?

Again I will have to repeat my point made in very first post. AIDS is a diesease which spreads through shamful acts...i.e ZANA....Its not about choosing partner carefully..its about chosing the right partner...the partner who has not commited the shameful act. It is also not necessary that having many partners and unsafe sex would surely lead you to AIDS. It's perhaps also the will of Allah whomsoever get punished.

The questions you are raising are not something which requires much thinking. Everything is nature bound. You may also ask what would be the implications if one person drink the whole sea water. What implication would we have if we dont see sun. When a bomb drops on Heroshema why does milion inocent die. Again I would say the word I used before..."collateral Damage".

I dont know what else I can add logically to statements above so lets hear what you have to say.

Mirch bhai,

My rationale is only for the believes, for a non-believer the concept of shirk does not even exist.

Brother psyah has already explained it nicely, I will only add a few words though a lot can be said about it.

We, as Muslims, can not and will not accept any philosophy that accepts or denies Allah exclusive of its characteristics because Allah is acknowledged by us in the manifestation of his characteristics and this is exactly what Quran has invited us to ponder about.

Now when an atheist denies God/s he denies Allah as an entity exclusive of its characteristics. Creation, for instance is one of the characteristics of Allah, an atheist denies Allah, yet accepts himself as an individual and attribute his creation towards an ambiguity, which is “Shirk” precisely.

yes, because this is an Attribute of Allah Ta’ala. I showed you logically that there has to be an eternal – infinite regression isn’t possible. Using our common sense we know that we didn’t create ourselves, neither we have been around forever, nor did we come from nothing. Hence, a being who has been around forever created us and rest of the creation. Now this being has to be intelligent and must posses will; otherwise, the delay in our creation cannot be explained. Therefore, we call this Eternal Allah Ta’ala.

from top of my head this can be refuted in three ways

1 – If universe has been around forever then it means it would have taken us infinite amount of time to get here. In other words, it means we would never have got here. Have you seen yourself lately!?

2 – We know that we have not been here forever. Which means that at some point in time, something happened in universe, some changes took place and those changes gave us birth. Look at this logically: If no changes took place then we would never have been born as universe would have remained as it was for infinite. However, we are here, which means changes were must! But here is the problem: a) If universe always had what it takes to bring about those changes then what took it so long? What’s up with the delay? Why did we only come recently?
b) Since universe is the only thing which has been around forever and if it didn’t have what it takes to bring about those changes where did it get it from?
3 – The big bang theory proves that our universe had beginning. This has become a fact in world of science now!

We know that the creation has a beginning and an end. Hence, universe had a beginning and will end by the Will of Allah.

this statement and next blunder of yours show that you are an agnostic for the heck of it. You know nothing about science or scientific facts and yet to claim to follow them. Scientific facts are based upon research, empirical observations, and testable evidence. Yes, there is some common sense involved but you’re mixing science with philosophy.

already explained 5 times…it is hardly my fault if you don’t understand my arguments

utter rubbish and typical blunder, which normally comes from creationists, but guess what this time around an agnostic is the criminal. Are you sure you are an agnostic and you follow science for everything? What is our universe? Here is the definition form Wikipedia: The Universe is defined as everything that physically exists: the entirety of space and time, all forms of matter, energy and momentum, and the physical laws and constants that govern them. However, the term Universe may be used in slightly different contextual senses, denoting such concepts as the cosmos, the world or Nature.
Off course, we are here talking about the cosmological definition of universe, because the time, space, laws are metaphysical concept which are used to describe relationships between objects and such. Now having that definition, the big bang is a moment in time when the universe (cosmological) started to expand from its previous state of singularity and science describes this is beginning of cosmological universe. It didn’t “burst” or “explode”, nor was it a single atom. We don’t know what singularity is! The Big bang theory isn’t a really theory anymore and a theory is not mere speculation and it is based on many facts and empirical evidences presented by physicists and scientists in the field of cosmology. So please try to get your facts straight if you say that you heavily relay on science!

backup what? Have you actually shown that my statements are bogus assumptions? Please do that first instead of repeatedly making this claim.

do you even know the definition of agnosticism? Let me tell you that you are not an agnostic! Agnosticism is to believe that there is no proof in favour or against any higher being or creator! You are a deist, who believe that there a higher/spiritual being or creator, but we are not suppose to follow any particular religion – something along these lines. Please read about these two beliefs at Deism and Agnosticism

Peace d-tox..ed

You should know by know that when Allah (SWT) says "Do you think I will not do this, I can do such and such" that it means it will happen as so.

Now as for life after death.

Those who reject Our signs We shall soon cast into the fire, As often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins so that they may truly taste the Penalty, For Allah is exalted in power, wise.

Surah 4 Verse 56

Re: Does Allah exist?

Psyah
(Lets open a new thread on Life after Death) This thread cannot cater for many topics as currently being discussed.

no no no Miss Psyah.

You are taking me wrong. I am not denying the signs for Qyamat. However I am saying that we might be taking the wrong meaning of the verses 3 and 4. Verse number 2 is talking about Nafs (which is related to spirituality) Hence I cannot accept the meaning of bodily resurrection in verse 4 and 5. As I said I might be wrong but as I said before my limited knowledge on this subject doesn’t allow me to accept the bodily resurrection.

I agree with some of your moral points in above posts. However I am open to critisism. If you think I am going in wrong direction then kindly tell me where do you think I am going wrong. I have provided you with Quranic Verses which seems pretty obvious in telling the story. I have given you the Tafsir of the verses and they are also like on open book. Tell me where am I going wrong?

Sorry, I didn’t understand the infinite regression you mentioned. Can you please explain it in a different way?

I don’t understand ths point either. What do you mean by t would have taken us infinite amount of time to get here?

Right, assuming that unverse hasn’t always been there and has been created, I agree with your questions. What/who made it so? It’s the answer that we don’t know.

My friend, while I applaud your efforts for bringing the logic of science in this arguments, but be careful, are you going to pick and choose your science? for example, science also talks of human evolution and that monkeys and human shared a common ancestor. Would you believe in that?
[/quote]

Just a red herring. While I appreciate your interest in my knohow of scientific facts, the topic is not about me.

right, because your argurment didnt make any sense to me at all.

Right, I am unsure what you’re going on about. I am not doubting the big bang there. And I am sorry for calling the “singularity” a single atom. I am no physcist and I should have read wikipedia before posting just like you do. My bad. What I was trying to convey which you obviously didn’t understand was that there where did that single atom or singularity came from? I don’t know, it could be Allah, or it could be something else.

Since you to like to take science into consideration, which I honestly admire in relgious folks, again what about other theories, which would disapprove Allah’s existence, like theory of evolution? Or is the evlolution theory bogus and you only belive in bang theory because it kinda fits with your existing belief systems?
[/quote]

Ok, you got me, I am a Deist who was pretending to be a agnostic. My friend, I dont care about labels, call me deist, agnostic, kaffir, sunni, shia etc By strict definition I honestly do not want to be agnostic. I would like to believe there is a higher being and we afterall have a purpose/reason to be here.

Re: Does Allah exist?

If you say you believe these things that's one thing, but calling it proof is too much. proof is something that stands up on its own and is based on facts, not blind faith, opinions and personal beliefs.

Can you backup the statement "prophecy is considered the most authentic criterion and a vital proof for the prophet"?

If we apply this criterion, every tarot card reader, astrologer and jyothisht is a prophet!

A simple question. If God really uttered these words, why did he/she have to do that? Obviously this God wants people to believe "I am He" badly and is anxious to offer proplehcy as a way of convincing them. Why not just plant that belief in them, being God the all powerful? Frankly this statement is more proof that "I" may not be "He" rather than "I am He".

Even if one accepts the criteria set by the atheist (which by the way are full of holes but that is a different discussion), your statement that "no one can ever imagine......" is completely false. Many many people can certainly so imagine and in fact have imagined a lot more amazing events. These people come from all sorts of professions and religions. In fact 'vocations' such as astrology are much older then the Quran.

how do you equate skin and fingers? they are not the same.

A stronger argument may be DNA can be obtained from any part of the skin but then you have two problems here: 1) DNA can be obtained from any of the body, not just skin and 2) DNA can only be used as evidence in certain types of acts, not all.

This is also full of holes, in fact there are more holes than substance because:

1) how do you equate corruption to pollution?
2) even if you do that, how do you call fossil fuels that the Arabs have in abundance man made?
3) most importantly, is God admitting that man is more powerful than God that man can destry what God created?

So why do god fearing muslims reject Israel's right to existence?

1) How do you jump from 'alter Allah's creation' to genetic engg? This statement could refer to almost anythinga and everything that man and animals do. For example animals eat stuff created by God and alter the food don't they?

2) Even if if by some stretch of imagination if one thinks this refers to GI, genetic engineering was performed in ancient India thousands of years before Islam came about. So how can you call this a prediction or a prophecy?

In fact ancient Hindu texts not only talk about GI but about teh dangers of it, the good kind and the bad kind etc. You should read up on our Vedas and ancient books of medicine which are a thousand times more specific than this lose statement you quote!

How do you equate 'move' to 'blow up'? two different things.

Again, mountains were moved thousands of years ago before Islam came about, so you can call this statement a very late news item rather than prediction. For example

In Ramayana, in a particular battle when Lakshmana gets immobilized by a poisoned arrow of Indrajit, Hanuman goes looking for a particular herb for antidote. When he couldn't locate it, he moves and carries the entire mountain where it grows!!

Makes no sense, this jump from horses to transport systems. And oh by the way, you mean to say horses did not exists before Islam? How can this be called a prophecy when horses were used centuries before Quran was written?

Why zoo? why not the Great Flood and the gathering of wild beasts in Noah's arch - which preceded Quran so cannot be a prophecy

Or the gathering of the wild monkey army in Ramayana which again happened long long before Islam!

Or may be it refers to Barnum & Bailey circus animals?

You are jumping from rivers to oceans, but let's put that aside for a moment.

The cleverly placed 'presently' inside paranthesis changes the prophecy doesn't it? Why are you introducing words that did not exist in the quote from Quran?

Even putting that aside here is a simple, a very simple question to you:

Suez connects Meditarranean and Red Sea. Both are salt water bodies. Did Quran misread one of them as sweet water?

similarly the Panama canal connects the Caribbean with Pacific Ocean, both of which are salt water as well.

So can you please dispense with this prophetic nonsense?

Various people were always brought together - when armies were formed and battles fought; when universties were bringing students internationally and exchanging knowledge; when there a swyamvara occurred; when a large Yagnya was performed....I can go on.

And all of these predate internet, satellite systems, telephone and what you call fast transport systems. All of these are well documented in books and sculptures of many civilizations that precede emergence of Islam and Quran.

In fact if you want to look for ancient references to remote sensing-signalling, satellite communication and data transfers, read up on the Ramayana and Bhagvat Gita.

huh? please recheck you quote and see if you mixed the words up. As it stands, it says that "the victim is questioned about the crime the victim committed". Perhaps this is the source of why female rape victims are made to prove with four wirnesses while the accused male can sit pretty, in many islamic countries?

Books existed before Islam obviously. Monks took cured palm leaf collections abroad in abundance

If Quran was predicting printing press, there is nothing in the statement you've quoted about that

can you show me when, where and which scientist has proved extra-terrestrial life? bollocks man!

Oh by the way, Hindu scriptures talk clearly about the universe, the various star systems and planets, the expansion and contractions, the science and math of orbits, gravity and super nova. They also talk about the time-space relationships and the curvature of time in various parts of the space (eg: a minute in Brahmalogh/Sathyalogh being X years in earth etc). And these were written thousands of years before Islam and Quran.

So, how is anything you state here a prophecy when all of this has been explained a million times more specifically before?

I am going to tell you something truly breadtalking here. There is an ancient book written by Sage Bharadwaja titled "Vymanika Sastra". The book "Vimana Aircraft of Ancient India and Atlantis" by By David Hatcher Childress, Ivan Terence Sanderson quotes from the Vymanasastra liberally. Just google it.

The sastra referred not only describes the aircraft manufacture, the alloys used, the mapping of atmospheric forces including pressures, currents, turbulence etc but also the layers and air routes that a pilot should know.

So forget about prophecies and prrof in Quran. Here is proof why present day Hindus are dumbest creatures in the world - when such documented knowledge exists within Sanskrit, not even 2% of Indians can read/write that language!

QUOTE=d-tox..ed;6574413]
AIDS
*"It never happens that permissiveness overwhelms a people to the extent that they display their acts of sex shamelessly and they are not uniquely punished by God. Among them, invariably, pestilence is made to spread and such other diseases, the like of which have never been witnessed by their forefathers." *(Ibn-e-Majah, Kitab-ul-Fitan)* see footnote
You need at least a doctor of medicine and an expert of social behaviour at the same time to talk about such behaviours and their fatal consequence. Muhammad (Peace be upon him) was neither of them, but a Prophet of God who didn’t copy from the Bible and paste in the Quran and foretell the same fate of perverts of Sodom and Gomorrah for the future perverts, but a unique disease never heard or known by earlier people, AIDS! The medical scientists are unanimous that this disease is never recorded in the annals of history.
[/QUOTE]

[/INDENT] Isn't this simply fatalistic? There are other and older texts that more specifically discuss attributes and changes in morality and behavior of humans, how it changes as the yugas progress and how the world gets cleansed and the cosmic karmoc cycle begins again.

So where is the prophecy? For Hindus this is just restatement of well known facts!

Re: Does Allah exist?

There are many reasons to believe that God OR Allah exist. Your and my body are the perfect example of Allah's creation. Think about human being how perfectly it is created? Every system of your body is the proof of Allah's existence. Your brain...............how it is working? Nobody until now exactly know, the functions of brain.........how it works...........how things are put in the memory...........billions of electrical connections in the brain...........Who created these?????
Only a fool will say that it came as such.............no creator????????

Similarly your kidneys...........these small two pieces of flesh...........what functions these two flashes are doing............cannot be done by very big machines as perfectly.........

Similarly your liver, heart.............your eyes.........your ears......... Go and read anatomy and there is no reason to not believe that GOD exists.

THEN WHICH OF THE BLESSINGS OF YOUR LORD, WILL YOU BOTH (JINN AND MEN) DENY.... The holy Quran Sura Alrahman 55/ part 27

Re: Does Allah exist?

^ well said!mashallah:]