yes, because this is an Attribute of Allah Ta’ala. I showed you logically that there has to be an eternal – infinite regression isn’t possible. Using our common sense we know that we didn’t create ourselves, neither we have been around forever, nor did we come from nothing. Hence, a being who has been around forever created us and rest of the creation. Now this being has to be intelligent and must posses will; otherwise, the delay in our creation cannot be explained. Therefore, we call this Eternal Allah Ta’ala.
from top of my head this can be refuted in three ways
1 – If universe has been around forever then it means it would have taken us infinite amount of time to get here. In other words, it means we would never have got here. Have you seen yourself lately!?
2 – We know that we have not been here forever. Which means that at some point in time, something happened in universe, some changes took place and those changes gave us birth. Look at this logically: If no changes took place then we would never have been born as universe would have remained as it was for infinite. However, we are here, which means changes were must! But here is the problem: a) If universe always had what it takes to bring about those changes then what took it so long? What’s up with the delay? Why did we only come recently?
b) Since universe is the only thing which has been around forever and if it didn’t have what it takes to bring about those changes where did it get it from?
3 – The big bang theory proves that our universe had beginning. This has become a fact in world of science now!
We know that the creation has a beginning and an end. Hence, universe had a beginning and will end by the Will of Allah.
this statement and next blunder of yours show that you are an agnostic for the heck of it. You know nothing about science or scientific facts and yet to claim to follow them. Scientific facts are based upon research, empirical observations, and testable evidence. Yes, there is some common sense involved but you’re mixing science with philosophy.
already explained 5 times…it is hardly my fault if you don’t understand my arguments
utter rubbish and typical blunder, which normally comes from creationists, but guess what this time around an agnostic is the criminal. Are you sure you are an agnostic and you follow science for everything? What is our universe? Here is the definition form Wikipedia: The Universe is defined as everything that physically exists: the entirety of space and time, all forms of matter, energy and momentum, and the physical laws and constants that govern them. However, the term Universe may be used in slightly different contextual senses, denoting such concepts as the cosmos, the world or Nature.
Off course, we are here talking about the cosmological definition of universe, because the time, space, laws are metaphysical concept which are used to describe relationships between objects and such. Now having that definition, the big bang is a moment in time when the universe (cosmological) started to expand from its previous state of singularity and science describes this is beginning of cosmological universe. It didn’t “burst” or “explode”, nor was it a single atom. We don’t know what singularity is! The Big bang theory isn’t a really theory anymore and a theory is not mere speculation and it is based on many facts and empirical evidences presented by physicists and scientists in the field of cosmology. So please try to get your facts straight if you say that you heavily relay on science!
backup what? Have you actually shown that my statements are bogus assumptions? Please do that first instead of repeatedly making this claim.
do you even know the definition of agnosticism? Let me tell you that you are not an agnostic! Agnosticism is to believe that there is no proof in favour or against any higher being or creator! You are a deist, who believe that there a higher/spiritual being or creator, but we are not suppose to follow any particular religion – something along these lines. Please read about these two beliefs at Deism and Agnosticism