So far archeological remains have not proved any theory about evolution correct. Which is why they are still caled theories and to date are still be researched because as more and more research is happening the past assumptions related to these theories keep getting falsified as research progresses. Those who claim it is fact are living in Lala land who probably have never picked a book on DNA genealogy and read it properly. Even in DNA genealogy lineages traced beyond the scope of 30,000 years are based on very inaccurate assumptions because that is the extent of radio carbon dating and the methods applied after that are not precise till after 80,000 years. All the research in DNA genealogy has proven that there are no relations between homo sapiens and other homonid species. The most DNA genealogy has been able to trace back human lineage is 50,000 years to parts of Africa and that data along with geological data has been put to use for reconstructing human migration patterns. As new research brings new facts, new assumptions are made and old ones discarded and theories take different facets. Setting all other religions apart me being a muslim can say none of this scientific discovery conflicts with what Islam says i.e. God created Adam, no timeline given. However those who use the scientific discoveries as ways to replace the theories put forth by by Chrsitianity and Judaism are correct to in so far as the biblical versions of human lineage and incorrect. And those people who use these theories to say God had no hand in creation of us are jusr surmising and have their own agendas.
I already explained the difference between micro and macro evolution. Micro evolution has already been proven. By extension, macro evolution has a very strong leg to stand on.
And I do believe you're referring to anthropologists, not archaeologists. While the two are similar, anthropology deals more heavily in human remains and biology.
There is no "agenda," in surmising that God had nothing to do with the world. When you believe that God must have created the world because you lack evidence to the contrary (regardless of how strong that evidence is), that's your confirmation bias. And that is your agenda, no one elses.
To reject evolution pretty much provides a distinct religious bias on behalf of the individual rejecting it.