Re: Do philosophical theories
forget about my beliefs. the stuff you posted in pair of male and female threads, not even science is verifies that. Continue living in your bubble. who cares!
Re: Do philosophical theories
Yes southie just like yourself.
Re: Do philosophical theories
forget about my beliefs. the stuff you posted in pair of male and female threads, not even science is verifies that. Continue living in your bubble. who cares!
You sure you wanna go there? please bring credible argument points.
every single link was based on science, including some from prestigious universities, written by scientists and geneticists with many years of education and research. but i guess they are not as knowledgeable as you.
Re: Do philosophical theories
not a single concrete evidence and who takes bella seriously anyways. the kind of inauthentic links that she pulls out and the circular tracks she follows has dented nothing but her own credibility as a worth-taking-seriously poster
Yes southie just like yourself.
I am confused. First, you state no one takes bella seriously and she is not a credible poster. When I disagree, I too am no longer a credible poster.
I think the lady hit the nail on the head. That if someone disagrees with you, that someone is not credible. Carry on, credible sir. Carry on.
Re: Do philosophical theories
blogs are best for venting. carry on there
Re: Do philosophical theories
blogs are best for venting. carry on there
Are you speaking to yourself? Cause you are the one doing the venting - assigning levels of credibility to posters who disagree with you.
Re: Do philosophical theories
You can believe all you want.
But sorry to say you have no idea what you talk about.
What is the difference between you and followers of religious scholars? Seriously?
You follow those who seemingly have some kind of degree on producing ‘objective evidence’ but not always have an objective evidence.
Religious scholars ask people to believe on what is said in scriptures, without claiming they have "objective’ evidence. At least they do not make false claims.
There is no objective evidence of change in species. Its all based on speculations and assumptions.
**
Please read the topics before arguing for argument sake. Thank you.**
Re: Do philosophical theories
But sorry to say you have no idea what you talk about.
you can think whatever you want, but it's obvious from all your posts that you seem to think anyone with opposing views is wrong.
**
[quote]
What is the difference between you and followers of religious scholars? Seriously?
[/quote]
**
[quote]
You follow those who seemingly have some kind of degree on producing 'objective evidence' but not always have an objective evidence.
[/quote]
No, I follow what MAKES SENSE. I follow the evidence. I follow what basic common sense would say. I don't follow anything blindly.
[quote]
There is no objective evidence of change in species. Its all based on speculations and assumptions.
[/quote]
evidence is there for those that are willing to accept it. People will always find reasons to not accept it for the sake of their faith or other firmly held ideologies. i can give you all the information in the world that supports evolution, but you will disregard all of that. so really, dont ask for evidence when you have no intention of looking at it.
**
[quote]
Please read the topics before arguing for argument sake. Thank you.
[/quote]
**
the post you quoted me in was a response to rainydays who felt the need to attack me personally and going completely off topic, and my response was for his post which attacked me. And please don't tell me what i should be posting when you cant even read the post above my post.
Re: Do philosophical theories
BBC News - Species count put at 8.7 million
Category:Rate of evolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Was there enough time for speciation to bring us 8.7 Million creatures? And which model of speciation is the correct one?
If evolution was true and not just a possibility then tell us which is correct and which is incorrect … tell us if speciation is too slow then why are there so many life forms?
Re: Do philosophical theories
even artificial selection has not provided any proof of speciation. The entire structure of evolutionary theory is built on mere set of assumptions, failed experiments and hopes that one day biologists will be able to reach some observable evidence that they are yet to attain.
Re: Do philosophical theories
Is there any disease diagnostic practice which is established and carried out by following the theory of evolution?
Re: Do philosophical theories
please read this:
Mechanisms: the processes of evolution
it explains all the different mechanisms supporting evolution.
very self explanatory
Re: Do philosophical theories
Is there any disease diagnostic practice which is established and carried out by following the theory of evolution?
Don't know about diagnostic practice, but antibiotic resistant bacteria shows how natural selection and survival of the fittest works. a mutation favoring bacteria to survive lethal dose of antibiotic. they reproduce and their offspring inherits this characteristic resistance.
Re: Do philosophical theories
Bella read this
Re: Do philosophical theories
Is it not this the essence of the discussion where people consider other person wrong if other person has opposite view?
Let me break it to you:
Religious people also follow WHAT MAKES SENSE to them.
Just because what makes sense to you does not mean it is right.
Word ‘Evidence’ is subjective.
For people who follow religion scriptures, scriptures make sense to them and they feel they have ‘evidence’ too.
People who follow scientific literature blindly are not different from those who follow religious scriptures.
No one can say who is right and who is wrong.
You think there is enough evidence for believing on so called evolution, (but forget about religious people), even scientific people question this “theory”.
My suggestion again: Read the topic carefully.
Have at least basic knowledge of genetics and biology etc. before blindly follow so called scientists with any degrees.
You could not even answer simple question on anatomy of man and woman in other thread, let alone trying to make a conversation on very deep concepts on genetics and biology. 
Re: Do philosophical theories
you can think whatever you want, but it's obvious from all your posts that you seem to think anyone with opposing views is wrong.
No, I follow what MAKES SENSE. I follow the evidence. I follow what basic common sense would say. I don't follow anything blindly.
evidence is there for those that are willing to accept it. People will always find reasons to not accept it for the sake of their faith or other firmly held ideologies. i can give you all the information in the world that supports evolution, but you will disregard all of that. so really, dont ask for evidence when you have no intention of looking at it.
the post you quoted me in was a response to rainydays who felt the need to attack me personally and going completely off topic, and my response was for his post which attacked me. And please don't tell me what i should be posting when you cant even read the post above my post.
Well said Bella. Right on.
Re: Do philosophical theories
Fair enough, and I have no arguments against someone who holds his religious beliefs. But the issue is where people try to make it look like the science is supporting their beliefs when it’s clearly not.
I didn’t argue with this point. Yes, if you hold your religious scriptures as the truth then thats all the evidence you need. I am not trying to disrespect your or anyones religious scriptures .
**
**
here is where I disagree. People who follow science are not doing it out of fear of going to hell or for any sort of punishment. don’t most religous people follow their religion to get to Heaven and avoid hell? Science is challenged and is always developing. religion is not usually challenged and when it is, its not well tolerated.
No religion accepts challenges. Science does. that’s the difference.
I wasn’t a born agnostic or atheist. So i know what it’s like when one starts to challenge religion. it’s not encouraged and severely punished even in certain cases. so no, you cannot compare those who follow scientific evidence to those who follow religious scriptures.
But I have been called wrong many times simply because my views oppose yours and others here
if something is called theory doesn’t mean it’s just a guess. It’s a well-supported and documented explanation for observations. Science does not claim to be the “supreme Truth” like religious scriptures do. Science is modest that way. overwhelming majority of scientists, especially biologists and the ones who study life sciences, do accept evolution. Some are skeptical about certain mechanisms but in general, they all accept evolution. Scientists are always skeptical and always question every theory, and area always open to other possibilities. they are not closed minded, and are open to challenges and new discoveries. something very different from religious folks.
Is there a reason why you always seem post in such a derogatory tone with me? If you disagree, does it mean my knowledge is less?? You seem to ignore ALOT evidence given by scientists, geneticist, biologists yet you think i am the one without knowledge?
LOL are you serious? You lost that argument so badly, you couldn’t give me one solid argument in favor of your claims. anatomy of male female is not the reason people have sex, maybe thats your opinion but its not a fact. i find it so interesting how you defied all the modern psychiatrists, medical organization made of researchers and doctors, geneticists and biologists. please educate yourself before making such silly claims that have no basis. and most importantly, stop telling others they need to educate themselves, when you lack so much of it yourself.
I have alot of respect for those who firmly believe in their faith no matter what it is. To each his own. I could care less who believes in creationism vs evolution. But to call something a ‘joke’ and claim there is no evidence when there is, is not very mature. And you have constantly told me how i lack basic knowledge in every thread where you argued with me which I find very derogatory. The only time I have said that to your posts has been in retaliation after you said it. It’s really hard to argue with someone when they think the other person is beneath them intellectually.
so this is my last response to you diwana.
if you think i lack so much in knowledge compared to you, there is no point in arguing with you.
Re: Do philosophical theories
Fair enough, and I have no arguments against someone who holds his religious beliefs. But the issue is where people try to make it look like the science is supporting their beliefs when it's clearly not.
I didn't argue with this point. Yes, if you hold your religious scriptures as the truth then thats all the evidence you need. I am not trying to disrespect your or anyones religious scriptures .
here is where I disagree. People who follow science are not doing it out of fear of going to hell or for any sort of punishment. don't most religous people follow their religion to get to Heaven and avoid hell? Science is challenged and is always developing. religion is not usually challenged and when it is, its not well tolerated. No religion accepts challenges. Science does. that's the difference.
But I have been called wrong many times simply because my views oppose yours and others here
if something is called theory doesn't mean it's just a guess. It's a well-supported and documented explanation for observations. Science does not claim to be the "supreme Truth" like religious scriptures do. Science is modest that way.
Is there a reason why you always seem post in such a derogatory tone with me? If you disagree, does it mean my knowledge is less?? You seem to ignore ALOT of scientists, geneticist, biologists yourself yet you think i am the one without knowledge?
LOL are you serious? You lost that argument so badly, you couldn't give me one solid argument in favor of your claims. i find it so interesting how you defied all the modern psychiatrists, medical organization made of researchers and doctors, geneticists and biologists. please educate yourself before making such silly claims that have no basis.
I learn a lot from your posts. How did you get so smart?
Re: Do philosophical theories
I learn a lot from your posts. How did you get so smart?
i wish i were